If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Scalia says Cheney can run a secret governement.
But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca
under the neocons. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. I guess the fact that Scalia was not the only one who sided with Cheney escaped your eagle-eyed perception, eh? And what pray tell exactly is a "neocon"? BTW, were you not the same Art Kramer who not too long ago was whining and decrying the existance of off-topic posts in this NG? And here you go again, starting *another* off-topic thread yourself... Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. Art, if Scalia recused himself from the case, you still get a 6-2 vote. Your bias is showing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. Art, if Scalia recused himself from the case, you still get a 6-2 vote. Your bias is showing. It doesn't make Art wrong - in any other case, an officer of the court who personally knows a principal in the case would/should stand aside and let other members of the court hear it. A fishing trip is nothing close to incidental contact between jurist and witness - Scalia should have been sensative to the perception of impropriety over his refusal to recuse himself. v/r Gordon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Krztalizer" wrote in message ... But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. Art, if Scalia recused himself from the case, you still get a 6-2 vote. Your bias is showing. It doesn't make Art wrong - in any other case, an officer of the court who personally knows a principal in the case would/should stand aside and let other members of the court hear it. A fishing trip is nothing close to incidental contact between jurist and witness - Scalia should have been sensative to the perception of impropriety over his refusal to recuse himself. \ And? His recusal would _sitill_ have resulted in a majority decision. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Scalia says Cheney can run a secret governement. From: nt (Krztalizer) Date: 6/25/2004 2:20 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. Art, if Scalia recused himself from the case, you still get a 6-2 vote. Your bias is showing. It doesn't make Art wrong - in any other case, an officer of the court who personally knows a principal in the case would/should stand aside and let other members of the court hear it. A fishing trip is nothing close to incidental contact between jurist and witness - Scalia should have been sensative to the perception of impropriety over his refusal to recuse himself. You need to review the actual case. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:59:59 +0000, ArtKramr wrote:
But these two guys are drinking, hunting buddies. So much for justice in Amerca under the neocons. Now, now! How can it be secret if everybody knows about it. Why next thing you know everyone in town will know the details of Projects X, Y, and L. IBM __________________________________________________ _____________________________ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Ragnar" wrote in message ... "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... It doesn't make Art wrong - in any other case, an officer of the court who personally knows a principal in the case would/should stand aside and let other members of the court hear it. A fishing trip is nothing close to incidental contact between jurist and witness - Scalia should have been sensative to the perception of impropriety over his refusal to recuse himself. \ And? His recusal would _sitill_ have resulted in a majority decision. That doesn't matter. The public ought to have justices on the Supreme Court who can recognize their own involvement with participants taking part in hearings before them. Any justice who thinks that going on a fishing trip, or dining regularly with one another, or exchanging family visits with litigants before their bench is demonstrating a deplorable lack of judgement if he can categorize that kind of behavior as incidental. Incidental contact to most of the public is restricted to stuff like holding a door open for someone, or passing the salt at a diner counter, or picking up and returning an envelope that the other person has dropped. Going on fishing trips or dinner engagements or vacations to the Caribbean together is a lot more than a casual contact. We expect our Supreme Court justices to know the difference. If figuring it out is too complicated for them, then it's time for them to resign from the bench or retire. George Z. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Britain Reveals Secret Weapon - Chicken Powered Nuclear Bomb ! | Ian | Military Aviation | 0 | April 2nd 04 03:18 PM |
Wright Flyer's Secret Name? | James Dandy | Military Aviation | 3 | January 17th 04 08:05 PM |
Air Force launches rocket with secret military payload from Cape Canaveral | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:07 PM |