If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I believe the thought is that you might have left some device on the plane. I would not be surprised if, while they let you off the plane, they also make others get off and then inspect the cabin. .... and maybe fix the cargo latch. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Who gives a rat's ass what the bus driver thinks? You are a paying customer, not his servant!
You make your decision and you live with the consequences... The fact that nothing happened on that flight (I assume) is neither here nor there... If it had ripped that door off and had to emergency land, and people slide down the chutes and break limbs, would you now be worrying about what someone's hired help thinks of you? As far as the pilot saying he didn't need to inspect the mechanics work, if the door had departed in flight you can bet he would have been singing a different song to the DOT, as they took his certificate for failing to inspect... The FAA/DOT and the Federal Courts are on the same play book on that one - "You, the pilot, are 100% responsible if you were aware there was a question of airworthiness (and sometimes even if there is not a question)... Yes, we may also get mechanic, but you, the pilot, will be the first up to the steps to the gallows..." Denny "Maule Driver" wrote in message .com... This happened in Houston years ago - maybe 6 or 7. Curious about what any airline people think of this. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in message
... If nothing was wrong, why did you get off the plane? He already explained that. In fact, that's what his initial post was about. Did you read it? He left the airplane on a "hunch". And there is nothing wrong with yelling fire in a crowded theater, if it's on fire. What if you simply think that the theater might catch fire at some later moment. Is it okay to yell "fire" in the crowded theater then? 100 people died in a Rhode Island nightclub last year because people waited too long to"yell "FIRE"". Your assertion is that someone should have yelled "fire" before the club actually caught fire? Or are you claiming that the fire was allowed to progress for some significant time before it occurred to anyone to say anything about it? Regardless, that case (and others like it) had much more to do with violations of safety rules than it did with the actual fire. And, I seriously doubt that once an actual fire was present, anyone sat around wondering whether they should say something about it. The whole point here is that the original poster did not KNOW anything. And in fact, seeing as how the flight proceeded uneventfully, it could even be argued that his "hunch" was wrong. It would have been irrepsonsible at best, and criminally disruptive at worst for him to make a general announcement to the other passengers that he believed something to be wrong with the airplane. There was absolutely no actual evidence to that effect. Get off the guy's back. You might be willing to go around making pronouncements regarding things you know absolutely nothing about, but that doesn't mean that's reasonable behavior, nor that you have the right to criticize someone else for not doing so. Pete |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Maule
Driver wrote: "Tom Fleischman" In article , Paul Rekieta , "Maule Driver" Well, they were as nice as could be about it and didn't even let a patronizing smirk out but I was totally spooked and said that I was going to get off the plane. I explained that it shouldn't be a problem since I only had a carry on bag and well, I was just going to stay behind I bet you couldnıt do this in todayıs terrorist environment. Couldn't do what? Get off the airplane? That's preposterous, what are you suggesting they would do? Not let you off? Handcuff you to your seat? Please. Well I'm sure one could get off but I think there might be other consequences. If a specific procedure is lacking I'm sure the pilot would attempt to evaluate the request and the person making it and then determine whether more security actions would be required. Might be a much different situation for passengers with the same request but different appearances. Well yeah, sure, I'm sure that there would be security concerns raised in the minds of the crew and the Thousands Standing Around, but if they don't find anything, even in your name were Mustafah, then the situation would be about the same as what you experienced, it would just take a lot longer to be on your way. It certainly would not be a case of "you couldn't do this in today's environment". |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Duniho ) wrote:
Get off the guy's back. You might be willing to go around making pronouncements regarding things you know absolutely nothing about, but that doesn't mean that's reasonable behavior, nor that you have the right to criticize someone else for not doing so. Peter, take a look at "Nomen's" posting history on Google. It appears we may have a professional troll here. Don't feel bad. Earlier today I was snagged in the Student newsgroup... -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Might be a much different
situation for passengers with the same request but different appearances. Its a sad fact that in today's environment doing this would have severe consequences. To call for a search because the passenger who wants off is wearing a turban or has the name Mustafah will get you a discrimination lawsuit. It has happened to my company already. This is why you see babies and little old ladies called out for secondary searches at the gate and seldom folks who may be from the middle east. I hope the liberals sleep tight tonight. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter R." wrote in message
... Peter, take a look at "Nomen's" posting history on Google. It appears we may have a professional troll here. Ahh...thanks for the warning. I can usually detect the amateur trolls pretty easily, but the pros are better at fooling us. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Maule Driver" wrote: This happened in Houston years ago - maybe 6 or 7. Curious about what any airline people think of this. I used to spend a big part of my life on commercial aircraft when I lived in the middle east. Once I was waiting to fly from London to Jeddah when a Saudi asked me if I would carry some luggage for him. I refused and watched him walk along the line of passengers until someone agreed. It was one of those situations where I was uneasy but couldn't decide whether or not to pursue it (this was a looong time before people started worrying about terrorists) So the plane is taxiing to the runway and I unfasten my seatbelt, walk over to the nearest cabin attendant and told her what happened. Back to the ramp, unloaded and I have to crouch behind a bunch of sandbags with the police, trying to identify which box it was. We eventually find it and blow it up - it was toys! -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Almost Instrument Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:26:05 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote in Message-Id: : "Peter R." wrote in message ... Peter, take a look at "Nomen's" posting history on Google. It appears we may have a professional troll here. Ahh...thanks for the warning. I can usually detect the amateur trolls pretty easily, but the pros are better at fooling us. Nomen Nescio is the cognomen assigned to anonymous authors by the usenet posting gateway. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:26:05 -0800, "Peter Duniho" wrote in Message-Id: : "Peter R." wrote in message ... Peter, take a look at "Nomen's" posting history on Google. It appears we may have a professional troll here. Ahh...thanks for the warning. I can usually detect the amateur trolls pretty easily, but the pros are better at fooling us. Nomen Nescio is the cognomen assigned to anonymous authors by the usenet posting gateway. So they're actually a *collective* of professional trolls. I see... -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Instrument Checkride passed (Long) | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | February 11th 05 02:41 AM |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
The cost sharing - reimbursment - flight for hire mess | Roger Long | Piloting | 18 | October 21st 03 03:12 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |