A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OLV GPS 36 approach question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 5th 06, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default OLV GPS 36 approach question

Went out seeking some IMC time today. Severe clear at my home airport,
so took a trip from KMBO (Madison MS) to KOLV (Olive Branch MS)

Early morning clouds at OLV was 500 overcast, so I figured by the time I
got there, it would at least be broken. It wasn't the clouds that was
restricting the visibility so much as the haze. 2 mile forward viz at
best on my final approach.

Memphis Approach asked what approach I wanted and I elected GPS RWY 36
approach. I was at 4000 feet and about 10 miles out I was cleared to the
NOCAP initial approach fix, My instructions were descend and maintain
2,100, cleared for the GPS36 approach. My heading was 006 to the fix so
it was as easy as it gets to to intercepting the final approach course.

When I was looking at the profile part, before NOCAP I was to maintain
2800. So rather then descend to 2100, I maintained 2800 til I got to
NOCAP.

I didn't say anything / question the approach controller since the
frequency was wall to wall traffic, but I didn't want to hit anything
poking out of the ground either.

What is the overriding factor in this case (besides my PIC decision of
maintaining 2800)?

I can see where the controller got the 2100 figure which was the final
approach fix step down altitude, but I also didn't want to cause a
traffic conflict by maintaining 2800. So, I figured I'd have a better
chance at 2800 then 2100 as things poking out of the ground won't move
out of my way.

Was I correct in maintaining 2800 before the IAF or is the controller
allowed to clear me below a minimum dictated by an approach chart?

Is a ASR in order or did I mess up somewhere?

Allen
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
Contact approach question Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 114 January 31st 05 06:40 PM
Approach Question- Published Missed Can't be flown? Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 8 May 6th 04 04:19 AM
Where is the FAF on the GPS 23 approach to KUCP? Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 36 April 16th 04 12:41 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.