If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:22:40 GMT, "Ed Majden"
wrote: "Grantland" "Grantland" Nope. Pulse-burn. Much less efficient. Symantics! It was a pulse jet! Fiesler Fi-103 (V1) Specifications Engine: Argus pulse-jet 600 pounds of thrust Length: 25' 4" Wingspan: 17' 6" Weight: 4800 lbs. Fully fueled Fuel: 150 gallons of Acetylene gas 1 mile per gallon Range: Approximately 160 miles from launch site Performance: Speed between 360-400 mph Flew at altitude of 2000-3000 ft Average flight time of 22 minutes Armament: 2337 pound war head Not as efficient, but still an early prototype PULSE JET!!! Different principal perhaps! Time marches on and so do design techniques. Sorry but the V1 was not powered by acetylene -- they used very low-grade gasoline. There would be no way to (safely) store sufficient acetylene onboard even if they wanted to use it as a fuel. Acetylene was used for starting in very cold weather but most certainly never as a fuel. -- you can contact me via http://aardvark.co.nz/contact/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Pulse Engines Dead? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | January 21st 04 05:38 PM |
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 05:36 PM |