If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Wanted to ask how easy or natural it gets for pilots to perceive
aircraft positions and movements without actually looking at the respective indicators. I've been in the flight deck only once, and confess that I had very little physical sensation to give me an idea of the 0.7 Mach or whatever that the A320's airspeed indicator was showing. In fact, at the end of the journey, there was little to suggest the speeds we were actually traveling at. Also, nearly throughout the 4-hour flight, the heading was different from the direction of travel, but I didn't feel that wind correction angle. I'm not sure whether or not the landing was a x-wind, which tells you that that went imperceived too. The only thing I could tell at all was the slightly pitch-up nose attitude throughout, though I couldn't assess the angle. Was I just me that was dumb or has anyone else not physically felt these sensations at the first go? Ramapriya |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
"Ramapriya" wrote in message
oups.com... Wanted to ask how easy or natural it gets for pilots to perceive aircraft positions and movements without actually looking at the respective indicators. [...] Was I just me that was dumb or has anyone else not physically felt these sensations at the first go? You cannot fly without your eyes. Which is not to say there's not useful information coming through your physical senses. But whether you are looking out the window or at the instruments on the panel, you need to be able to *see* what is going on, because kinesthesia isn't a reliable source of aircraft position and movement. There are too many illusions caused by the characteristics of flight maneuvering that have no correspondence to movements naturally experienced by primitive humans. Now, if you are asking whether it's difficult to fly without instruments, but with your eyes, no it's not. In something like an Airbus, it might be a little more complicated but for light planes generally, flights in visual conditions could all be safely accomplished without any instruments whatsoever. Altitude, airspeed, and power settings are the key performance indicators on the instrument panel. Altitude is the hardest to estimate, but it's not too hard to tell the difference between "pattern altitude" and "cruise altitude". The main reason for needing the altimeter is to comply with various regulatory issues; either to cruise at an appropriate altitude, or to avoid (or remain inside) particular airspace. Airspeed is less difficult than altitude. You get plenty of feedback from the noise the air makes as it goes past the airframe, and from the feel of the flight controls (they get more difficult to move as airspeed increases). In addition, as long as you can maintain a specific power setting and can tell your pitch attitude, you can pretty fairly predict what your actual airspeed is going to be. Power settings are the easiest, at least in a fixed-pitch prop airplane. You just listen to the airplane. Just as you don't need a tachometer in your car to tell you when to shift, you don't need a tachometer in the airplane to tell you if you've got the power set in the right ballpark. Things get more complicated with a constant speed prop, because two different controls affect the actual power setting, but only one produces a change in the engine RPM. But even there, a pilot can estimate the throttle setting just by the position of the throttle control, and then use the RPM control to ensure the correct power setting. It's not really clear to me which question you're asking. But instruments are by no means critical for visual flight. However, one absolute cannot trust one's non-visual perception for the purpose of controlling an airplane. Hopefully one of those two answers addresses whatever question you're actually asking. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Peter Duniho wrote:
Altitude, airspeed, and power settings are the key performance indicators on the instrument panel. Altitude is the hardest to estimate, but it's not too hard to tell the difference between "pattern altitude" and "cruise altitude". The main reason for needing the altimeter is to comply with various regulatory issues; either to cruise at an appropriate altitude, or to avoid (or remain inside) particular airspace. Airspeed is less difficult than altitude. You get plenty of feedback from the noise the air makes as it goes past the airframe, and from the feel of the flight controls (they get more difficult to move as airspeed increases). In addition, as long as you can maintain a specific power setting and can tell your pitch attitude, you can pretty fairly predict what your actual airspeed is going to be. Thanks, Pete. I wasn't asking any specific questions as such, and only wanted to know whether you guys can generally tell these parameters without actually reading them off the instruments. "Airspeed is less difficult than altitude" gives me a definite complex, because that was the one thing I just couldn't estimate at all. And btw, it was only recently that I learnt that an airplane could also be landed by looking out the window. A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! Until then, I was under the belief that nobody sensible could afford to take his eyes off the instruments in a phase of flight as critical as the final. That's probably because I can't perceive airspeed Ramapriya |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Flying up in the flight levels in a jet there is, as you note, no sensation
of movement from the cockpit, especially when those clouds way off in the distance don't seem to be getting any closer. I can sense pitch changes like "We're starting down" from seat A19 or wherever. Any private pilot worth his or her salt should be able to land a general aviation airplane without an airspeed indicator. Jets are so numbers-driven that a pilot can give up a lot of efficiency by not using the airspeed indicator until on very short final....then the eyeballs take over. Bob Gardner "Ramapriya" wrote in message oups.com... Peter Duniho wrote: Altitude, airspeed, and power settings are the key performance indicators on the instrument panel. Altitude is the hardest to estimate, but it's not too hard to tell the difference between "pattern altitude" and "cruise altitude". The main reason for needing the altimeter is to comply with various regulatory issues; either to cruise at an appropriate altitude, or to avoid (or remain inside) particular airspace. Airspeed is less difficult than altitude. You get plenty of feedback from the noise the air makes as it goes past the airframe, and from the feel of the flight controls (they get more difficult to move as airspeed increases). In addition, as long as you can maintain a specific power setting and can tell your pitch attitude, you can pretty fairly predict what your actual airspeed is going to be. Thanks, Pete. I wasn't asking any specific questions as such, and only wanted to know whether you guys can generally tell these parameters without actually reading them off the instruments. "Airspeed is less difficult than altitude" gives me a definite complex, because that was the one thing I just couldn't estimate at all. And btw, it was only recently that I learnt that an airplane could also be landed by looking out the window. A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! Until then, I was under the belief that nobody sensible could afford to take his eyes off the instruments in a phase of flight as critical as the final. That's probably because I can't perceive airspeed Ramapriya |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
And btw, it was only recently that I learnt that an airplane could also
be landed by looking out the window. A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! Until then, I was under the belief that nobody sensible could afford to take his eyes off the instruments in a phase of flight as critical as the final. That's probably because I can't perceive airspeed Percieving airspeed in jets might be harder (never flown one) but it's generally not too hard in piston singles. Really, as long as you can see the runway, there's no need to use any instruments. Most people (or at least the ones I've flown with, myself included) don't look at anything except the airspeed when in the pattern (and even that is just checked every few seconds or so as a reference). Basically, do you need instruments to stay on the road or maneuver the car while driving? And do you need be constantly looking at the speedometer? Flying is like driving, in a way, just in three dimensions. You do it all on outside cues*. *Obviously, this doesn't include flight in instrument conditions (low visibility, basically). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Ramapriya wrote:
A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! It sounds like you need to get this pilot friend to take you for a ride in a small plane. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/TknoFlyer Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
"John T" wrote
Ramapriya wrote: A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! It sounds like you need to get this pilot friend to take you for a ride in a small plane. That's a real problem, He's in Dubai UAE, and I'm in Tampa, Florida. :-) I've been trying to get him to go for a short sightseeing flight for quite a while now. :-) Bob Moore |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Bob Moore wrote:
"John T" wrote Ramapriya wrote: A good pilot friend told me that he routinely landed by purely visual references! It sounds like you need to get this pilot friend to take you for a ride in a small plane. That's a real problem, He's in Dubai UAE, and I'm in Tampa, Florida. :-) I've been trying to get him to go for a short sightseeing flight for quite a while now. :-) Bob Moore I will, in a few weeks, in that Jet Fox. Watch this space ) Ramapriya |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
Yes, you can tell when you are turning, etc to an extent. Part of
training requires that you close your eyes, get disoriented, and then recover the aircraft. Most of use rarely actually get disoriented in those tests. However, that is for a short period of time. If you closed your eyes for several minutes you would certainly lose you ability to tell if you were turning or not. -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Feeling aircraft sensations
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... Yes, you can tell when you are turning, etc to an extent. Part of training requires that you close your eyes, get disoriented, and then recover the aircraft. Most of use rarely actually get disoriented in those tests. However, that is for a short period of time. If you closed your eyes for several minutes you would certainly lose you ability to tell if you were turning or not. -Robert Years ago, 26 to be exact, when I first got my PPL I went to an FAA safety seminar which are rarely held locally, I'm the youngest person there by at least 15 years. They have the spinning chair (with a joy stick) where they sit you down, blind fold you and spin you. Your job is to move the stick like it is controlling what you are feeling. The old guys laughed as I was the first and sure enough I steered left when I was either not spinning at all or was spinning the other way. One of the old guys who laughed especially hard was next in the chair and when it was stopped he moved the stick to the right and then the FAA guy said something to him and he turned his head and then he started pulling back on the stick like he was climbing. Being a pilot of many 1000 hours he new this could not be the case so he pushed the stick forward. Laughs were had by all except for the guy in the chair. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |