A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old May 15th 04, 01:03 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

It did, after some lower and slower flights.

Not after the high-altitude flights, though, and the average gap between
"hard" flights of the same airframes was a month and a half.


That it didn't happen doesn't mean it wasn't possible.


  #52  
Old May 15th 04, 01:14 AM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net

Why?


Just because.

I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this before!" aspect
to this. Of *course* men have flown in space. The only difference here -
and the challenge of the task - is to do it with private money.

Why is that a challenge? Because traditionally space travel has only been
done at the expense of billions of dollars and huge government
bureaucracies. The X-Prize is out to demonstrate that space travel doesn't
have to remain the domain of governments.

I personally like the idea of non-government entities in space. Why? "Just
because," mostly. The fact that they're doing this without tax money is a
bonus - and I'm generally supportive of space programs.

My opinion is that the major advances in space technology from this point
forward are going to come from the private sector. Space tourism is just
the start. When companies figure out how to use microgravity profitably to
manufacture crystals and special alloys, we'll start to see real advances
and lower costs for space technology. Then perhaps manned exploration of
the solar system.

That's a l-o-n-g way in the future, though. I'll be lucky to see much of it
fully realized in my lifetime.

But I'm a dreamer - much like Rutan and the others vying for the X-Prize.
The $10M pot isn't going to cover the costs of the attempt much less
generate a profit.

They're dreamers saying "why *not*."

More power to them.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #53  
Old May 15th 04, 01:15 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...

Just because.

I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this
before!" aspect to this.


Actually, based on responses in this thread there seems to be quite a bit of
that!


  #54  
Old May 15th 04, 01:39 AM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...

What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital
or not)?


None, but that's irrelevant.


That *is* the relevant point. Sure, it's been done before. Not by a private
corporation, though.

Maybe this will foster alternatives to NASA, ESA, and the Russians.

Pete


  #55  
Old May 15th 04, 01:55 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pete" wrote in message
...

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...

What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital
or not)?


None, but that's irrelevant.


That *is* the relevant point.


No, that's not the relevant point, this is:


Sure, it's been done before.


It's been done before. It won't be a first.


  #56  
Old May 15th 04, 02:18 AM
Vaughn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Pete" wrote in message
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
"John T" wrote in message
What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital
or not)?


This one: http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/ or did you mean manned?


None, but that's irrelevant.

That *is* the relevant point.

No, that's not the relevant point, this is:


Sorry, but I have to go with Pete here, the relevent point is that it is
being done by a small private corporation...and they are making it look easy!

Vaughn




  #57  
Old May 15th 04, 02:26 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Vaughn" wrote in message
news

Sorry, but I have to go with Pete here, the relevent point is that
it is being done by a small private corporation...and they are making
it look easy!


What is significant about a private corporation duplicating a feat that a
government agency accomplished decades earlier?


  #58  
Old May 15th 04, 02:37 AM
N329DF
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What is significant about a private corporation duplicating a feat that a
government agency accomplished decades earlier?


The fact that they are doing it without tax money and a huge outfit like NASA
behind them is VERY significant.
Matt Gunsch,
A&P,IA,Private Pilot
Riding member of the
2003 world champion drill team
Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team
GWRRA,NRA,GOA

  #60  
Old May 15th 04, 03:05 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N329DF" wrote in message
...

The fact that they are doing it without tax money and a huge
outfit like NASA behind them is VERY significant.


Why?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! BlakeleyTB Home Built 10 May 20th 04 10:12 PM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 07:05 AM
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) Peter Stickney Military Aviation 45 February 11th 04 04:46 AM
Ta-152H at low altitudes N-6 Military Aviation 16 October 13th 03 03:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.