If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Chad Irby" wrote in message om... It did, after some lower and slower flights. Not after the high-altitude flights, though, and the average gap between "hard" flights of the same airframes was a month and a half. That it didn't happen doesn't mean it wasn't possible. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net Why? Just because. I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this before!" aspect to this. Of *course* men have flown in space. The only difference here - and the challenge of the task - is to do it with private money. Why is that a challenge? Because traditionally space travel has only been done at the expense of billions of dollars and huge government bureaucracies. The X-Prize is out to demonstrate that space travel doesn't have to remain the domain of governments. I personally like the idea of non-government entities in space. Why? "Just because," mostly. The fact that they're doing this without tax money is a bonus - and I'm generally supportive of space programs. My opinion is that the major advances in space technology from this point forward are going to come from the private sector. Space tourism is just the start. When companies figure out how to use microgravity profitably to manufacture crystals and special alloys, we'll start to see real advances and lower costs for space technology. Then perhaps manned exploration of the solar system. That's a l-o-n-g way in the future, though. I'll be lucky to see much of it fully realized in my lifetime. But I'm a dreamer - much like Rutan and the others vying for the X-Prize. The $10M pot isn't going to cover the costs of the attempt much less generate a profit. They're dreamers saying "why *not*." More power to them. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"John T" wrote in message ws.com... Just because. I don't think there's any sort of "Wow! NOBODY's done this before!" aspect to this. Actually, based on responses in this thread there seems to be quite a bit of that! |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote "John T" wrote in message ws.com... What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital or not)? None, but that's irrelevant. That *is* the relevant point. Sure, it's been done before. Not by a private corporation, though. Maybe this will foster alternatives to NASA, ESA, and the Russians. Pete |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete" wrote in message ... "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote "John T" wrote in message ws.com... What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital or not)? None, but that's irrelevant. That *is* the relevant point. No, that's not the relevant point, this is: Sure, it's been done before. It's been done before. It won't be a first. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "Pete" wrote in message "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote "John T" wrote in message What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital or not)? This one: http://www.orbital.com/SpaceLaunch/ or did you mean manned? None, but that's irrelevant. That *is* the relevant point. No, that's not the relevant point, this is: Sorry, but I have to go with Pete here, the relevent point is that it is being done by a small private corporation...and they are making it look easy! Vaughn |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
"Vaughn" wrote in message news Sorry, but I have to go with Pete here, the relevent point is that it is being done by a small private corporation...and they are making it look easy! What is significant about a private corporation duplicating a feat that a government agency accomplished decades earlier? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
What is significant about a private corporation duplicating a feat that a
government agency accomplished decades earlier? The fact that they are doing it without tax money and a huge outfit like NASA behind them is VERY significant. Matt Gunsch, A&P,IA,Private Pilot Riding member of the 2003 world champion drill team Arizona Precision Motorcycle Drill Team GWRRA,NRA,GOA |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"N329DF" wrote in message ... The fact that they are doing it without tax money and a huge outfit like NASA behind them is VERY significant. Why? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
Ta-152H at low altitudes | N-6 | Military Aviation | 16 | October 13th 03 03:52 AM |