If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
UPDATE: Between the time the original note was posted and now, the deal
has fallen through. Owner decided the plane was worth more to him even with adding all the rework rather than selling for a loss. Carl, you are a lucky man. You can *that* close to falling into a money pit of immeasurable depth. As Dan said, it's a buyer's market. You will find a "cream puff" out there somewhere, and it probably won't be advertised. Just be patient. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Carl, you are a lucky man. You can *that* close to falling into a money
pit of immeasurable depth. Dang chell specker. That should read "You CAME *that* close..." -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
ADD'L INFO: Well, sometimes I don't put in ALL the details for brevity
purposes. The plane was actually a co-ownership arrangement, and I was going to buy-out all 3. The point man understood what was going on with the plane's condition, etc., but the others seemed to think they should still get their full market value. Not a good arrangement. So, the end result was that I would have had to pay close to normal market for the plane, and still put $7000 + whatever other nightmares cropped up. Duh. I'm not *that* hard up for a plane! The point man was decent about it, and I feel sorry for him. No easy way out when you're dealing with others. The A&P doing the annual would have also done my maintenance had I purchased the plane (or any other). Like I said, this was the first time he'd seen the plane. Prior A&P retired. I trust this A&P; I'm familiar with his work on some rental planes I fly. And, yes, before you flame me, I *do* know that the other guy was paying for the annual, his money talking and not mine, etc. So, we'll just see what turns up. Two other candidates have surfaced, both within 40 minutes of home base, so I have hope ;-) Carl "Carl Orton" wrote in message ... UPDATE: Between the time the original note was posted and now, the deal has fallen through. Owner decided the plane was worth more to him even with adding all the rework rather than selling for a loss. Thanks for the responses, though! Carl "Carl Orton" wrote in message ... Hi, All; Have looked at some a/c for sale, and have found one I'm interested in. The bird has not been flown in over two years, and is out of annual. The owner said that he would have an annual done before quoting me a price; guess he figures it will be worth more as a result. This was one of those situations where I noticed a plane that didn't seem to have much use, so I decided to contact the owner. So, an annual was scheduled. The A&P (has never seen this a/c before) says that it needs quite a bit of work. Needs a top overhaul, some brake work, nose strut rebuilt, and some other lesser items. Otherwise, the airframe is in good shape; paint fair, but passes the 20' test, needs some carpet and plastic. What is usual here for working up a price, realizing that there probably isn't any typical way of handling the negotiations? At this point, nothing is signed. The owner is stating that if everything was working fine, it would be worth "X" dollars, and he is considering the option of selling it for "X" minus the estimated cost of repairs for the items above. My thoughts are that since a test flight has not occured, that more things might crop up, so the price should be decremented some more. Is there any rule of thumb for these situations? It's a common simple plane, but I'd really prefer to work with something local at my current airport instead of continuing to hunt all over the state/country. Thanks; Carl |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Mike, I think I know where you're coming from, but would like to seek
clarification. How bad could the cam be? Although it wasn't *flown* in 2 years, it was run/taxied regularly (monthly? who knows?). Yes, I'm aware that it got no where near operating temp, acids in the oil, etc. I just wanted to clarify that it wasn't really just sitting for 2 years. No way would I even look at that unless it was priced to account for a factory reman! But, I'm curious. I know that a pre-buy / annual won't find EVERYTHING. So do you just go with gut feel? Do you reduce an offer price any to account for unknowns on *any* plane? Or, does the fact that a plane is flown regularly provide better confidence that what you're getting is close to what's represented? Thanks; getting better at finding the issues; Carl "Mike Spera" wrote in message ... Hey Carl, It would be interesting to track this as it unfolds. I doubt you would get truthful and accurate numbers, but I'm sure the group would love to see where this fellow ends up. Top overhaul? Yeah right. Until they pull the cylinders and see the corroded, useless cam. After 2 years of sitting - I would put money on it. And I love the notion of "subtract all the necessary repairs from the purchase price". I would agree if I could fly it for a year and do the following annual with MY mechanic. We subtract all the repairs for the year and anything that comes up in the next annual. Then I will tell you that is a good method of figuring the plane's real worth. All the "necessary repairs" are not going to jump off the plane and fall into the mechanic's squawk book today. Guaranteed. But, after 80-100 hours of operation, I'd place money on the fact that many, many items (initially unnoticed) come up. I'll make it interesting, I'll pay for half of what comes up and, of course, I'll pay for the inspections. In the "subtract the repairs from the price scenario", who gets to decide what the anticipated "repair price" will be? For this "top overhaul", are we getting new cylinders or some off the rack, cut rate rebuilds? If I am right and this top overhaul goes South, will it be a new cam or regrind? Will we assume the case will be usable? Alternator overhaul, carb overhaul, prop overhaul, muffler, exhaust stacks, hoses, control cables, scat tubing, pulleys, and the list goes on and on. But, as you said, they guy got greedy. He has been fooled by his own marketing and is trying to "buy" the airplane himself by taking on all the repairs. He just did you a tremendous favor. You get to watch what would have happened to you. My prediction: the total bill to get this thing in reasonable flying condition plus 6 months of flying will double or worse. More likely, when the bills start to mount, he will try to cheap out the remaining repairs or he will bail out and put it on the market again unfinished. I would look at a prospective plane like this: what does it have going for it? Paint, interior, engine, airframe, and avionics. If one is weak and the price is right, the bird is usually worth a look. Two or more and my interest fades no matter what the price. Opinions vary, Mike Carl Orton wrote: UPDATE: Between the time the original note was posted and now, the deal has fallen through. Owner decided the plane was worth more to him even with adding all the rework rather than selling for a loss. Thanks for the responses, though! Carl "Carl Orton" wrote in message ... Hi, All; Have looked at some a/c for sale, and have found one I'm interested in. The bird has not been flown in over two years, and is out of annual. The owner said that he would have an annual done before quoting me a price; guess he figures it will be worth more as a result. This was one of those situations where I noticed a plane that didn't seem to have much use, so I decided to contact the owner. So, an annual was scheduled. The A&P (has never seen this a/c before) says that it needs quite a bit of work. Needs a top overhaul, some brake work, nose strut rebuilt, and some other lesser items. Otherwise, the airframe is in good shape; paint fair, but passes the 20' test, needs some carpet and plastic. What is usual here for working up a price, realizing that there probably isn't any typical way of handling the negotiations? At this point, nothing is signed. The owner is stating that if everything was working fine, it would be worth "X" dollars, and he is considering the option of selling it for "X" minus the estimated cost of repairs for the items above. My thoughts are that since a test flight has not occured, that more things might crop up, so the price should be decremented some more. Is there any rule of thumb for these situations? It's a common simple plane, but I'd really prefer to work with something local at my current airport instead of continuing to hunt all over the state/country. Thanks; Carl __________________________________________________ __________________________ ___ Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com The Worlds Uncensored News Source |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Jay, et al:
Well, all along I figured it would need some major work. The A&P even found a prior illegal repair (bondo!) that will result in one portion being re-skinned. I just thought that the owners would realize they were throwing money down *their* pit for insurance/full hangar, want to get out, and want to deal with a cash buyer. HAH! As I said, 1/3 of the group had the "correct" (i.e., agreed with me) viewpoint, but 2/3 still had unrealistic dreams of market value. Yes, I count myself lucky. Carl "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:y6Qmb.33959$Tr4.60835@attbi_s03... UPDATE: Between the time the original note was posted and now, the deal has fallen through. Owner decided the plane was worth more to him even with adding all the rework rather than selling for a loss. Carl, you are a lucky man. You can *that* close to falling into a money pit of immeasurable depth. As Dan said, it's a buyer's market. You will find a "cream puff" out there somewhere, and it probably won't be advertised. Just be patient. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Orton wrote: UPDATE: Between the time the original note was posted and now, the deal has fallen through. Owner decided the plane was worth more to him even with adding all the rework rather than selling for a loss. That seems to be typical of owners who let a plane sit for a while - and is also the reason the plane sits instead of being sold. George Patterson You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Orton wrote: Mike, I think I know where you're coming from, but would like to seek clarification. How bad could the cam be? Although it wasn't *flown* in 2 years, it was run/taxied regularly (monthly? who knows?). Yes, I'm aware that it got no where near operating temp, acids in the oil, etc. I just wanted to clarify that it wasn't really just sitting for 2 years. No way would I even look at that unless it was priced to account for a factory reman! A Continental cam would be OK under those conditions. A Lycoming cam would still be toast. But, I'm curious. I know that a pre-buy / annual won't find EVERYTHING. So do you just go with gut feel? Sometimes. Do you reduce an offer price any to account for unknowns on *any* plane? No, you can try but unless the buyer just has to get out he won't do that. Or, does the fact that a plane is flown regularly provide better confidence that what you're getting is close to what's represented? That's almost always the case. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Orton wrote: Jay, et al: Well, all along I figured it would need some major work. The A&P even found a prior illegal repair (bondo!) that will result in one portion being re-skinned. Nothing wrong with Bondo if it's done right. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
ADD'L INFO: Well, sometimes I don't put in ALL the details for brevity
purposes. The plane was actually a co-ownership arrangement, and I was going to buy-out all 3. Wow. I've rarely seen a hangar queen that was owned by a multi-person partnership. Usually at least ONE of the partners likes to fly, and keeps the bird running. Are these older folks? The only time I've seen this kind of thing happen was in a partnership made up of guys who had all lost their medicals -- and they STILL wouldn't sell. Hope springs eternal, I guess... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Carl Orton"
writes: So, we'll just see what turns up. Two other candidates have surfaced, both within 40 minutes of home base, so I have hope ;-) Good luck Carl. And sometimes buying within the state can save on taxes. Chuck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging | X98 | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 04 04:07 PM |
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup | TripodBill | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | July 16th 04 04:50 PM |
150HP Grumman Super Yankee FS Price Reduced! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 6 | December 2nd 03 12:55 AM |
The Top 10 Reasons to Purchase "New" | Patty | Owning | 4 | August 4th 03 10:44 PM |