A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential Helicopter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old March 22nd 05, 05:56 PM
Toad-Man
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Helowriter" wrote in news:1111155479.986630.189070
@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

The Merlin in the UK was delivered five years late and 1.6 billion
pounds over budget, and Lockheed Martin was the systems integrator.
If we're to believe recent news, the F-22 and JSF are way, way, way
over budget with no end in sight. Oh, the phrase "cost overrun" was
actually coined for a Lockheed program -- the C-5 Galaxy.


Comanche.
  #12  
Old March 23rd 05, 12:55 PM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HW Thank you for the correction. I should have said "Asia" builds the
S-92 commercial fuselage. But remenber Sikorsky proclaimed themselves
to be the "All American Team". They are only all American however when
it suits their bottom line. If they cared so much for the welfare of
the American aerospace work force, they would have kept the commercial
S-92 work in the US also.

For the on going Army ARH RFP, Sikorsky was originally proposing a
modification of a foreign made helicopter. Again, bottom line.

CTR

  #13  
Old March 23rd 05, 06:26 PM
Rich
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CTR wrote:
HW Thank you for the correction. I should have said "Asia" builds

the
S-92 commercial fuselage. But remenber Sikorsky proclaimed

themselves
to be the "All American Team". They are only all American however

when
it suits their bottom line. If they cared so much for the welfare of
the American aerospace work force, they would have kept the

commercial
S-92 work in the US also.

For the on going Army ARH RFP, Sikorsky was originally proposing a
modification of a foreign made helicopter. Again, bottom line.

CTR


When and where did they proclaim to be an "All American Team"? They
haven't done anything that most if not all other aerospace
manufacturers have done around the world..Outsource to defray and
reduce costs. They probably weren't the first and they are definitely
not the only company.... and..what "foreign made" helicopter were you
referring to...just curious?.
...and none of these companies are charities..they all care about the
bottom line...

~R

  #14  
Old March 23rd 05, 07:51 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The All-American Team was important because the Government had long
insisted Presidential helo work be done in a secure manufacturing
environment crewed only by US citizens. VXX is also the helicopter for
the President of the United States, and that has some symbolic value.
All that, and concerns about crashworthiness and operating costs, went
out the window as payback to Berlusconi and Blair for their support in
OIF.

Don't take too much comfort in how Lockheed Martin values the American
aerospace worker -- they just won the Army Airborne Common Sensor
program with a Brazilian platform. The LM idea seems to be the
platform doesn't matter - it's the software that counts. Until, of
course, the Presidential platform flattens like a Merlin.

Oh, when the Comanche was cancelled, the undersecretary of the Army
admitted everyone on the contractor side had done just what had been
asked of them. The Army could never get its act, and its requirements
together.

As to Agusta Westland -- WG30.

HW

HW

  #15  
Old March 24th 05, 02:07 AM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On the back cover of the Winter 2004 Vertiflite issue is a full page
Sikorsky ad proclaiming "The All-American Sikorsky S-92...."

Again, it's Sikorsky's hypocricy that has the foul odor, not their
product.


The ARH is to be awarded this June. Ask me again then.

Have fun,

CTR

  #16  
Old March 24th 05, 02:07 AM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On the back cover of the Winter 2004 Vertiflite issue is a full page
Sikorsky ad proclaiming "The All-American Sikorsky S-92...."

Again, it's Sikorsky's hypocricy that has the foul odor, not their
product.


The ARH is to be awarded this June. Ask me again then.

Have fun,

CTR

  #17  
Old March 24th 05, 03:46 AM
~R
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


CTR wrote:
On the back cover of the Winter 2004 Vertiflite issue is a full page
Sikorsky ad proclaiming "The All-American Sikorsky S-92...."

Again, it's Sikorsky's hypocricy that has the foul odor, not their
product.


The ARH is to be awarded this June. Ask me again then.

Have fun,

CTR



...call it hipocricy if you want....the foul odor smells like sour
grapes to me...disgruntled former employee maybe?...I see nothing wrong
with the ad...it is All American...all the risks were taken here in the
states...design, testing...flight testing...anything and everything up
to production launch....we might as well rip up the Chevy truck
commercials...I guarantee you there's quite a few foreign made parts
under the hood..and thats got All American written all over it...I
don't think there is a major corp. in the world that hasn't leveraged
marketing in it's best interests...

..........still wondering what the "foreign made Helicopter" was
....interesting comment..

  #18  
Old March 24th 05, 05:02 AM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nope, never worked for Igor's company. Have admired their products
however. Worked in Aerospace for 25 years for most major airframers,
never layed off or fired. Still even exchange Christmas cards with all
my old bosses. The strength of Americas aerospace industry is in its
workers. Not the CEOs.

All the risks? Certainly not financial. Both Japan and China bought
into their contracts.

I am not saying Lockheed or the US101 is any better than Sikorsky or
the S-92. But people need to wake up and realize that the day any
aerospace CEO honestly cares about American jobs and technology is
over. I really wish I could have met some of the men fifty years ago
who did care like Larry Bell, Igor Sikorsky and John McDonnell.

By the way, I attended a conference two years ago where Curt Weldon
spoke concerning the Commanche. He said that if Sikorsky and Boeing
didn't straighten up their act, there was nothing he could do to keep
them from being canceled.

Have fun,

CTR

  #19  
Old March 24th 05, 02:37 PM
Helowriter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oh Good Grief, I've sat through enough Curt Weldon speeches to know he
doesn't understand a lot of what he talks about. Comanche was cancelled
because the Army changed its mind. The Army validated a Cold War
requirement for more than 10 years after the Cold War, then dropped it
to fund immediate Aviation needs in OIF. Boeing and Sikorsky gave them
what they asked for.

The strength of American aerospace is in its workers -- not just the
Union guys on assembly lines, but the engineers, program managers, test
technicians, etc. That's why you don't want the design authority on
helicopters to reside offshore.

Bell seems happy to be the LM build-to-print shop for European
helicopters. LM recommended the AB139 to replace the Jayhawk in the
Coast Guard, and they'll pitch the US101 for the Air Force rescue
requirement and other contracts. That gives you assembly jobs in Texas
and software jobs in New York, but it leaves the core engineering work
off-shore. That hurts US competitiveness.

Sikorsky made safety innovations in the H-92 way beyond what was
available when the EH101 was designed. It brought in international
partners to reduce the cost of the project and to get footholds in a
perceived market. The core engineering stayed in the US, and that's
what we need to be competitive.

HW

  #20  
Old March 25th 05, 03:02 AM
CTR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HW, what Curt Weldon realized years ago is that the Commanche had
become a "Work-Fare" program for Boeing and Sikorsky. After 13 years
all the Army had to show for it's investment was two overweight
underpowered prototypes and a proposal for a block stage improvement
program. Six years ago when I was visiting Boeing in Philly, over
drinks some engineers confided in me that they never expected the
Commanche to go into production. They felt the program had become
means to develop technology (avionics, FBW controls, composites) for
future viable programs. The fact that the program went on as long as
it did surprised even them.

"The strength of American aerospace is in its workers -- not just the
Union guys on assembly lines, but the engineers, program managers, test

technicians, etc. That's why you don't want the design authority on
helicopters to reside offshore."

I agree with you fully. But in the case of the US101 and VH92, both
aircraft are already supposedly developed. All that is left is is
stuffing with the special avionics, EMI protection, counter measures,
etc. And this work was to remain in the US no matter who won.

Is the S-92 an excellent product? Yes. Was it smart to bring in Japan
as an international partner? Yes. China? Time well tell.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 February 8th 05 03:20 PM
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 January 30th 05 04:48 AM
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 06:24 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Home Built 6 February 27th 04 10:11 AM
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot Badwater Bill Rotorcraft 0 February 25th 04 07:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.