I would not have thought this was possible

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:08:38 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote:

Franklin "Franklin wrote:
I explained once and once was enough.

Thank goodness for small favors.

Which is what your wife said on your honeymoon.

"Franklin wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:08:38 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote:

Franklin "Franklin wrote:
I explained once and once was enough.

Thank goodness for small favors.

Which is what your wife said on your honeymoon.


Doesn't your organ grinder want to talk direct?
Why does he need to use a sock?

"Franklin wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:00:34 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article
,
Ricky wrote:

On Jul 14, 9:45*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

I don't have the time to explain the obvious, Monkey Heh!

Monkey, if you think they are real, then you have confirmed that
you are an idiot.

Idiot.

Thanks, Idiot.

I rest my case.

BTW does your mommy & daddy know you are using the computer?

Ricky

No, but when they find out, they're going to be *****ed*.

It'll be grounded for a month, and no ice cream for dinner.

For your sad info, my mother and father bothpassed dies before I was
born. I was raised as an Army intelligence brat, *FYI* if you get my
strong drift, Monkies.


That's not what you've said in the past. I suppose socks invent stuff
as they go along. Just like your flying ability.

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:40 -0600, Franklin wrote:
Are you mixing up two vids?

One shows a tech's cranial being sucked off his head into the intake.

The other (far more improbable one) shows a man being sucked of the
ground
into the intake accompanied followed by a large flash and cloud of smoke.
Like some sort of stage illusion. A few hours later he's shown posing
for
the camera with his arm in a sling and a simple bandage around his head.

Perhaps the Flight Safety people were just trying to make you sit up and
take notice of safety.

A jet connected to an aircraft carriers catapult is at full power; that is
a LOT of air being moved. Anyone that moves into that airflow within a
foot or less of the lip of the intake is going into that intake.

And if you've ever seen a military jet that's ingested a bird on take-off
you'll know that the "stage illusion" is nothing of the sort; that flash
and cloud of smoke is *exactly* what happens, along with emergency vehicle
sirens, a hefty price tag, and a bunch of guys in uniform performing a FOD
walk down the runway once the sirens wind down. What makes you think that
a helmet and set of ear-defenders would cause less damage?

Terry

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

"Franklin " "Franklin wrote in message
...
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:30:47 GMT, Gary Mishler wrote:

"Franklin" wrote in message
...
Ricky wrote:

On Jul 11, 11:23 am, Franklin wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4

Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only look at a
jet engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake.


"Franklin," why don't explain and entertain us with your theory behind
this being a fake.

How does "looking at a jet engine for 2 seconds" convince one to
believe this accident
was a fake?

Franklin, the serviceman being sucked into the jet on-deck was real,
very, very real.

Ricky


Hello sock. Why doesn't your organ grinder ask the questions rather
than use his monkey?

For me, it's too amazing that a guy working next to an Intruder gets
sucked into one of its intakes with such massive force that it dragged
him off the ground but afterwards he doesn't have any crush damage from
jamming between the bullet cone and cowling and doesn't look like he
been squeezed hard up against the stator vanes.

http://www.imageno.com/k3bfdhgc73i0pic.html
http://images.marketworks.com/hi/72/72196/KL37C03.jpg


Maybe he's supposed to have squeezed through the low bypass compressor
bleed channel to come out unscathed. Heh heh! Let's have that 2 second
look at what those J52s on an Intruder really looks like ...

http://www.imageno.com/pyopisgsihhtpic.html


OK, so what passed through the engine to cause the rear flash in the
vid? If anything solid went through that turbofan there'd likely be a
blade-out which looks very different to the brief flare out in the vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU


The vid shows our hero posing for a photo only hours afterwards. No
shock, no crushed shoulders, no broken ribs, no split skull, no broken
nose. Seemed to me the vid showed the mannequin had a floppy thigh bone
but the guy looks fine afterwards, no bloodied clothing, no major
abrasions. ... Just an arm sling and a bandage for a head graze. Gimme
a break. He would be undergoing tests in ICU for the rest of the day
and may be the day after that as well.

A few hours afterwards he wouldn't be posing with his pals but he'd be
filling in incidence reports, the safety officer would be going berserk
and the carrier's senior officers would be doing some interviewing.

The vid's date is Feb 20 1991 but the quality looks like it's from the
1960s. Most vids from 1991 are in color. Try frame advancing the spoof
using this AVI rather than an FLV:

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...s/sucked%20in%
20engine.avi

Certainly there are fake videos in the world. This one however is real.
It
has been featured on network news magazines (Don't know if it was 60
Minuites, Nightline, or what). It also is used as a training film in the
military and most major airlines.
This one is real.

You're full of it. I explained once and once was enough.

Ok folks I get it now. We are dealing with a Troll. I will stop feeding
the Troll now.

"shywon" wrote in message
...
On Jul 13, 4:58 pm, "Terry Aardema" wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:23:05 -0600, Franklin wrote:
Ron Garret wrote:

In article ,
Ron Garret wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZiP4...eature=related

And indeed, it's fake. Bummer.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/onewing.asp

rg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gpPbpONK4

Some people WANT to believe this even though they need only look at a
jet
engine for 2 seconds to know it's fake..

According to the Flight Safety Briefing I attended when I was still
working for the Canadian Armed Forces, this is indeed real; military jets
are not like civilian jets...

Terry
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:http://www.opera.com/mail/

why are all you people arguing with this moron?

Exactly. It's a Troll or a moron, or a moron Troll. Let it die

Looks like the miasma's hiatus hence was rather short-lived... sigh.

On Jul 15, 11:06*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:00:34 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:
In article
,
*Ricky wrote:

On Jul 14, 9:45*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

On Jul 15, 2:06*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

For your sad info, my mother and father bothpassed dies before I was
born. I was raised as an Army intelligence brat, *FYI* if you get my
strong drift, Monkies.

"dies" before you were born? Learn some english, little boy.

I assume you're saying your mommy & daddy died "days" (?) before you
were born?
Which means you were pulled from your dead mommy via C-section?
Which means you lived through it?
Damn! Wish you would've suffered the same fate.
It's no wonder...it's obvious you were raised with no effective
parenting.

George

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:07:59 -0700 (PDT), George wrote:

On Jul 15, 2:06*pm, Franklin "Franklin
wrote:

For your sad info, my mother and father bothpassed dies before I was
born. I was raised as an Army intelligence brat, *FYI* if you get my
strong drift, Monkies.

"dies" before you were born? Learn some english, little boy.

I assume you're saying your mommy & daddy died "days" (?) before you
were born?
Which means you were pulled from your dead mommy via C-section?
Which means you lived through it?
Damn! Wish you would've suffered the same fate.

See how I control you, Monkey?

It's embarrassing, isn't it?

It's no wonder...it's obvious you were raised with no effective
parenting.

George The Monkey

Get back to me when you want to discuss aviation.

Monkey.

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:28:27 -0600, Terry Aardema wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:08:40 -0600, Franklin wrote:
Are you mixing up two vids?

One shows a tech's cranial being sucked off his head into the intake.

The other (far more improbable one) shows a man being sucked of the
ground
into the intake accompanied followed by a large flash and cloud of smoke.
Like some sort of stage illusion. A few hours later he's shown posing
for
the camera with his arm in a sling and a simple bandage around his head.

Perhaps the Flight Safety people were just trying to make you sit up and
take notice of safety.

A jet connected to an aircraft carriers catapult is at full power; that is
a LOT of air being moved. Anyone that moves into that airflow within a
foot or less of the lip of the intake is going into that intake.

And if you've ever seen a military jet that's ingested a bird on take-off
you'll know that the "stage illusion" is nothing of the sort; that flash
and cloud of smoke is *exactly* what happens, along with emergency vehicle
sirens, a hefty price tag, and a bunch of guys in uniform performing a FOD
walk down the runway once the sirens wind down. What makes you think that
a helmet and set of ear-defenders would cause less damage?

Terry

And the bird comes back out the rear with only a bandage on.

Uh-huh. Sure,