A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA approves O'Hare expansion plan



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 1st 05, 01:10 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAA approves O'Hare expansion plan

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/09/30....ap/index.html

"The plan drew intense criticism from some, largely because the 440-acre
expansion requires the city to buy and raze more than 500 homes, displacing
about 2,600 residents, and move nearly 200 businesses and a cemetery with
1,300 tombs dating back to the 1800s.

Mayor Richard M. Daley has long pushed to expand O'Hare, saying it would
speed up air travel throughout the United States. A cost-benefit analysis by
the city projected that the project would save more than $12 billion over
nearly two decades by reducing passenger and aircraft delays.

Critics say the city has exaggerated the project's benefits and
underestimated its cost. In July, the Transportation Department also said
the cost estimate was low."


  #2  
Old October 1st 05, 05:29 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hilton" wrote in message
ink.net...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/09/30....ap/index.html

"The plan drew intense criticism from some, largely because the 440-acre
expansion requires the city to buy and raze more than 500 homes,

displacing
about 2,600 residents, and move nearly 200 businesses and a cemetery with
1,300 tombs dating back to the 1800s.

Mayor Richard M. Daley has long pushed to expand O'Hare, saying it would
speed up air travel throughout the United States. A cost-benefit analysis

by
the city projected that the project would save more than $12 billion over
nearly two decades by reducing passenger and aircraft delays.

Critics say the city has exaggerated the project's benefits and
underestimated its cost. In July, the Transportation Department also said
the cost estimate was low."


The project was shut down a couple of hours after it was begun when
surrounding communities took their concerns to federal court. They have
managed to kill 4 previous expansion projects and are going for number 5.


  #3  
Old October 3rd 05, 02:37 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dave Stadt" wrote in message
The project was shut down a couple of hours after it was begun when
surrounding communities took their concerns to federal court. They have
managed to kill 4 previous expansion projects and are going for number 5.


It hope they win again. F**K Daley!

D.


  #4  
Old October 1st 05, 01:58 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:10:02 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/09/30....ap/index.html

"The plan drew intense criticism from some, largely because the 440-acre
expansion requires the city to buy and raze more than 500 homes, displacing
about 2,600 residents, and move nearly 200 businesses and a cemetery with
1,300 tombs dating back to the 1800s.

Mayor Richard M. Daley has long pushed to expand O'Hare, saying it would
speed up air travel throughout the United States. A cost-benefit analysis by
the city projected that the project would save more than $12 billion over
nearly two decades by reducing passenger and aircraft delays.


I am absolutely astonished over the pricetag for this expansion.
There has to be a better way for the City of Chicago to spend $15B.

Having said that - as a Chicago area resident - I would love to see a
Western vehicle/passenger entrance to the airport, and more gates.
Nearly every delay I encounter at ORD is related to lack of gates, and
planes getting sent to the penalty box as a result.
  #5  
Old October 1st 05, 03:02 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nathan Young" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 00:10:02 GMT, "Hilton" wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TRAVEL/09/30....ap/index.html

"The plan drew intense criticism from some, largely because the 440-acre
expansion requires the city to buy and raze more than 500 homes,

displacing
about 2,600 residents, and move nearly 200 businesses and a cemetery with
1,300 tombs dating back to the 1800s.

Mayor Richard M. Daley has long pushed to expand O'Hare, saying it would
speed up air travel throughout the United States. A cost-benefit analysis

by
the city projected that the project would save more than $12 billion over
nearly two decades by reducing passenger and aircraft delays.


I am absolutely astonished over the pricetag for this expansion.
There has to be a better way for the City of Chicago to spend $15B.

Having said that - as a Chicago area resident - I would love to see a
Western vehicle/passenger entrance to the airport, and more gates.
Nearly every delay I encounter at ORD is related to lack of gates, and
planes getting sent to the penalty box as a result.


I thought a west entrance was part of the plan. How they will get you to
the east side I don't know.


  #6  
Old October 3rd 05, 02:37 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
I thought a west entrance was part of the plan. How they will get you to
the east side I don't know.


The plan also includes 4 parallel runways with 2 perpendicular runways.
Howling crosswinds with icy runways just got more fun......

D.


  #7  
Old October 3rd 05, 02:22 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:02:49 GMT, "Dave Stadt"
wrote:


Having said that - as a Chicago area resident - I would love to see a
Western vehicle/passenger entrance to the airport, and more gates.
Nearly every delay I encounter at ORD is related to lack of gates, and
planes getting sent to the penalty box as a result.


I thought a west entrance was part of the plan. How they will get you to
the east side I don't know.


As long as it doesn't involved the stupid shuttle thingys that Dulles
uses, I will be happy.

  #8  
Old October 6th 05, 09:29 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Nathan Young wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:02:49 GMT, "Dave Stadt"
wrote:


Having said that - as a Chicago area resident - I would love to see a
Western vehicle/passenger entrance to the airport, and more gates.
Nearly every delay I encounter at ORD is related to lack of gates, and
planes getting sent to the penalty box as a result.


I thought a west entrance was part of the plan. How they will get you to
the east side I don't know.


As long as it doesn't involved the stupid shuttle thingys that Dulles
uses, I will be happy.


Talk of extending the People Mover, or shuttle buses. But first its
the lawyers turn to get rich. I expect most of the parallel runways to
be built, and maybe the southern most rr will be dropped. That one
would eat up parts of Bensenville.

  #9  
Old October 2nd 05, 03:46 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"The plan drew intense criticism from some, largely because....and move a cemetery with 1,300 tombs dating back to the 1800s.

Ooooh. Anybody remember the movie Poltergeist? I see an opportunity
here for a sequel grin

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 4 August 11th 04 03:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.