If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:04:20 -0500, "Ron Natalie"
wrote: "Stu Gotts" wrote in message ... Once again Ron shows the world he has nothing better to do with his time than to spend it breaking other user's balls. I am not trrying to "break anybody's balls" (except maybe this guy's A&P instructor). I am just trying to stem the blatant misinformation provided. Your Honor; Looks to me like a difference of opinions here, and as usual yours is the only one you think is valid How about the company having a specific policy (possibly required by the insurance carrier) regarding the inspections. Now go onto the net and see if you can find which insurance carrier this FBO has and then see if you can find a 19 year old memo stating that it is absolutely, positively not a requirement! Insurance requirements were never an assertion. The assertion was that the regulations required it. Such was how it was expressed to AOPA. Such is how "Chuck"'s A&P instructor instilled it on him. How do you know? Were you actually there making sure all the regulations were quoted as written? Maybe you can also tell us what was in the "framer's" minds when they wrote them. And since the guy can't get the plane, Really? The guy can get the plane. The FBO is perfoectly willing to rent it to him over the 100 hour limit (and legally to). this is a mute point. In your case, I actually meant to say "mute". Too bad your heads so far up your ass that you weren't able to catch on. Since you've chosen to bust my balls, I'll point out the word you want above is "moot" not "mute". Here's some choices for you, Ron. Here's some choices for you. Contribute something useful to the conversation or shut the **** up. Exactly what I'm trying to say to you. Keep being an ass hole, boy. It really is entertaining! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 18:45:22 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: "Ron Natalie" wrote in message om... Here's some choices for you, Ron. Here's some choices for you. Contribute something useful to the conversation or shut the **** up. Heh...took the words right out of my mouth. "Moot" and all. Good, another mindless fan of fine entertainment. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:29:53 -0500, "G.R. Patterson III"
wrote: Stu Gotts wrote: How about the company having a specific policy (possibly required by the insurance carrier) regarding the inspections. And you're claiming that AOPA knows about this? Go to Hell, asshole. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. You missed it, George. Re-read it. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:58:37 -0500, Pixel Dent
wrote: In article , "G.R. Patterson III" wrote: Stu Gotts wrote: How about the company having a specific policy (possibly required by the insurance carrier) regarding the inspections. And you're claiming that AOPA knows about this? Go to Hell, asshole. Forget the AOPA, apparently the flight school doesn't know about their own policy either. If Stu had bothered to read the initial post he'd have seen that the flight school is the one that said it was OK for him to rent the airplane from them. Then why all the fuss? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotts wrote in message . ..
Once again Ron shows the world he has nothing better to do with his time than to spend it breaking other user's balls. How about the company having a specific policy (possibly required by the insurance carrier) regarding the inspections. Now go onto the net and see if you can find which insurance carrier this FBO has and then see if you can find a 19 year old memo stating that it is absolutely, positively not a requirement! And since the guy can't get the plane, this is a mute point. Best thing to do is to take his business elsewhere, since this particular FBO doesn't need the money. Here's some choices for you, Ron. Either get a real life, go to school to get your JD, or get your own TV show where you can be the head law partner! Throw me a bone, this is a troll, right? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Verbs Under My Gel wrote: Stu Gotts wrote in message . .. Once again Ron shows the world he has nothing better to do with his time than to spend it breaking other user's balls. How about the company having a specific policy (possibly required by the insurance carrier) regarding the inspections. Now go onto the net and see if you can find which insurance carrier this FBO has and then see if you can find a 19 year old memo stating that it is absolutely, positively not a requirement! And since the guy can't get the plane, this is a mute point. Best thing to do is to take his business elsewhere, since this particular FBO doesn't need the money. Here's some choices for you, Ron. Either get a real life, go to school to get your JD, or get your own TV show where you can be the head law partner! Throw me a bone, this is a troll, right? And this is where some putz usually proudly announces somebody got plonked. Wait for it... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
What rock did this jerknose crawl out from under? Jim Stu Gotts shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -Then why all the fuss? Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Black aeroplanes?
"Mark Kolber" wrote in message ... The FBI =is= willing to rent Jeff the airplane. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, the governor wannabe speaks. You should have won, then the whole
state would have seen how full of **** you really are! Sorry boys, I stand by my original post. Chuck simply just graduated school and related what he was instructed for those 18 to 30 or so months. The ball breaker starts his tirade immediately by saying they drilled him with misinformation, then goes on to quote FAR's like they were a sound bite at some low class news station and comes up with some memo from 1984. To me the majority of Natalie's posts are mostly consisted of proving others that their opinions mean nothing and he IS the authority. Now MY opinion (yea, I know what the dickheads are going to post as a reply) is that this amateur ball breaker is a spoiled brat that probably wasn't allowed to say anything while his daddy spanked him. On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:41:03 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: What rock did this jerknose crawl out from under? Jim Stu Gotts shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -Then why all the fuss? Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
100 Hr Inspection | Scott D. | General Aviation | 6 | August 15th 04 01:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Home Inspection Listings | Patrick Glenn | Home Built | 4 | April 26th 04 11:52 AM |
Service Manual - 50 hour inspection | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 1 | April 8th 04 03:17 PM |
100 Hour Inspection Question | FryGuy | General Aviation | 59 | November 19th 03 04:01 AM |