If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
I am an historian who is writing a nonfiction book involving WWII B-24 airmen. I have done considerable research on B-24s, but I am not a pilot. In my book, I tell of an incident in which an engine died and was feathered. I have been repeatedly told, and have repeatedly read, that feathering is done to reduce drag generated by a propeller in a dead engine. But a pilot with whom I was conversing said that he believed that part of the problem in a dead, unfeathered engine is the windmilling driving the dead engine, not just the angle of the prop.
Can anyone clarify this? Does one feather an engine simply to reduce the drag generated by the angle of the propeller, or it is also to stop the engine from turning? If the latter is correct, why? Thanks to everyone. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
Flanagan wrote:
/snip/ Can anyone clarify this? Does one feather an engine simply to reduce the drag generated by the angle of the propeller, or it is also to stop the engine from turning? If the latter is correct, why? Thanks to everyone. Flanagan, To clarify, the term "feathering an engine" actually means "feathering the propeller". The blades of the prop are twisted in the hub such that they are parallel with the airflow, and thus present minimal drag, to assist the aircraft in continuing flight with one less powerplant in operation. As a result of this, no lift is generated by the blades, and thus the prop, and the engine it's attached to, stops rotating. As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. To answer your question, yes, stopping engine rotation is desireable for several reasons. If the engine was experiencing some sort of internal failure, stopping rotation will contain damage to whatever component was affected, and hopefully preserve the rest for future use. If the engine was on fire, and the aircraft is equipped with fire fighting agent, you want to stop the airflow from the prop, as it tends to dissipate the agent, instead of letting it do it's work. And obviously in the case of fire, a turning engine may well pump more fuel in to the conflagration to begin with. Hope this helps. Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Scott,
It is so kind of you to reply, and your explanation is so interesting. Thank you! Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Scott,
It is so kind of you to reply, and your explanation is so interesting. Thank you! Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
"Flanagan" wrote It is so kind of you to reply, and your explanation is so interesting. Thank you! In addition, I would add that though it seems counter intuitive, a rotating unfeathered prop has more drag (much more) than a unfeathered prop that is not rotating. The feathering has two bonuses, in sorts then. An unfeathered prop has lower drag stopped, so feathering the prop stops the prop for the first reduction in drag, and feathering it after it is (or during stopping it) reduces drag even again. The reasons given about lessening damage, although true, are a very very distant reason on why to feather. The MOST important reason is to reduce drag, increase time in the air and gliding distance, because both of those reasons mean LIFE. Never seen a better reason than that one, yet. g -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Flanagan" wrote It is so kind of you to reply, and your explanation is so interesting. Thank you! In addition, I would add that though it seems counter intuitive, a rotating unfeathered prop has more drag (much more) than a unfeathered prop that is not rotating. The feathering has two bonuses, in sorts then. An unfeathered prop has lower drag stopped, so feathering the prop stops the prop for the first reduction in drag, and feathering it after it is (or during stopping it) reduces drag even again. The reasons given about lessening damage, although true, are a very very distant reason on why to feather. The MOST important reason is to reduce drag, increase time in the air and gliding distance, because both of those reasons mean LIFE. Never seen a better reason than that one, yet. g -- Jim in NC Very well said. I am sorry that I cannot currently recall a source to document the information. But considerable work has been done to document the rate and angle of descent of light aircraft with a fixed pitch propeller idling, windmilling, and stopped. To the best of my recollection, the descent with the propeller stopped was very similar to the descent with the engine idling; but the descent with the propeller windmilling was considerably steeper. In addition, some testing was docummented in one of the aviation magazines, possibly Flying, in which a Cessna 172 or 152 (I have forgotten which) was equipped with a steamlined fairing in place of the propeller and spinner. The aircraft was towed then towed aloft and released so that the gilde performance of the aircraft could be separated from the effects of the engine and propeller. However, in the particular case of the radial engines on the B17 and B24, windmilling engines normally occurred in cruising flight as the result of a loss of oil and consequently of oil pressure. In such cases, the engines would overspeed until they seized and the propeller assembly would then shear off of the affected engine. If you were lucky, it would then drop straight down; but if you were not lucky considerable damage would result--including serious injuries or deaths of crew members and occasionally the loss of the aircraft. Bcak in the day--during the war--the aircraft were in typically cruising in formation when that occurred, so there was little opportunity to attempt anything other than to evacuate the crew positions alligned with the propeller arc. Occassionally, in the present time, something similar still happens involving the few remaining DC3 and similar aircraft still in service; and the aircraft are frequently lost by pilots attempting to avoid overspeeding the (failed) engine. Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
"Flanagan" wrote It is so kind of you to reply, and your explanation is so interesting. Thank you! In addition, I would add that though it seems counter intuitive, a rotating unfeathered prop has more drag (much more) than a unfeathered prop that is not rotating. The feathering has two bonuses, in sorts then. An unfeathered prop has lower drag stopped, so feathering the prop stops the prop for the first reduction in drag, and feathering it after it is (or during stopping it) reduces drag even again. The reasons given about lessening damage, although true, are a very very distant reason on why to feather. The MOST important reason is to reduce drag, increase time in the air and gliding distance, because both of those reasons mean LIFE. Never seen a better reason than that one, yet. g -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
On May 5, 1:06 pm, Scott Skylane wrote:
As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. Nope. The blades cannot be everywhere at once, and so the area affected is no larger than the blade area. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Feathering an engine
"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news In article , wrote: On May 5, 1:06 pm, Scott Skylane wrote: As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. Nope. The blades cannot be everywhere at once, and so the area affected is no larger than the blade area. Dan YES! In aeronautical engineering analysis, a windmilling prop is considered to be a flat disk, with drag numbers to match. Feathering the prop greatly reduces drag. So you are saying if I loose power at high altitude in a fixed pitch prop aircraft, like a Skyhawk, I will have less drag if I stop the prop, as opposed to letting it windmill? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine-out procedures and eccentric forces on engine pylons | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 18 | May 26th 07 01:03 AM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:38 PM |
Tilt-rotor folding/feathering props. | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 2 | June 19th 04 03:18 AM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |