If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Kemp" wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:55:19 -0600, "John Carrier" wrote: "If everything goes perfectly on a mission, I would say it's comparable risk," says Grunsfeld. "But we've seen from Columbia that things don't always go perfectly. And it's that fundamental difference that on a Hubble flight if something goes wrong you run out of options very quickly. And on these space station flights we have lots of options." What I don't understand is - even if the Columbia mission had been to the ISS it may have all still ended in tragedy. That is true. But future shuttle flights won't be conducted in the same "come home as you are" fashion". A mission to the ISS that results in the detection of damage that prohibits a timely reentry and landing means the crew becomes extended guests on the ISS; detection of the same damage during a Hubble repair/service mission does not leave them that option and results in a rather short timeline within which to launch and complete some sort of rescue effort. It only takes a small leading edge crack to expand in the way we saw, so unless they're planning doing *very* thorough orbital "walk arounds" of the orbiter to inspect fro cracks, you're still likely to come back in pieces. After all the Columbia didn't know their wing was damaged when they attempted reentry. Because they did no investigation at all? Agreed that in-flight inspection, be it by space walk, remote viewing, or a camera mounted on the end of the shuttle arm, or the likely combination of all three, will not be foolproof, but you can bet that they pay particular attention to leading edge surfaces. Oh, and my vote would be to keep Hubble going, but it isn't my bum on the line, so I won't second guess NASA. I think it is a shame that it may be allowed to die--but like you I have pretty good confidence in the professionals' assessment. Brooks --- Peter Kemp Life is short - drink faster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helicopter headset plug - help needed | NewsGroups | Home Built | 4 | September 8th 04 05:21 PM |
Fiberglass release agent? | [email protected] | Home Built | 14 | July 9th 04 10:26 PM |
OV-10A Bronco Shameless ebay plug | DavidG35 | Military Aviation | 0 | November 7th 03 06:17 AM |
WTB: Turbine ignition exciter unit, single plug | Juan E Jimenez | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 25th 03 12:48 AM |