If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Circular runways for airports?
Now here's an idea almost as good as underground airports*: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...-airports.html A CIRCULAR runway for airports is being considered by the US navy, and the idea was recently tested in principle at General Motors' proving ground. It is thought to promise some advantages but to be more expensive than providing similar operational capacity in the normal way. One particular advantage is that it would save one-third of the space occupied by a conventional airport of equal capacity. The idea is to match the circumference to the landing speeds of the aircraft that would use it, assuming that each aeroplane would need to be sure of one sixth of the circumference. This would mean that for big jet aircraft, a circular runway of rather more than 60,000 feet in circumference would be required. Taking the usual first-class runway width of 300 feet, an aeroplane, touching down on the outside edge and aiming just to miss the inner edge, would have a run of 4860 feet before it approached the outer edge again. In that distance, thrust reversers and brakes would have been applied and the speed reduced perhaps sufficiently to use the nose wheel gently to steer the craft back onto another tangential course for the next mile of its run. As an alternative, the runway could be made wider. In that event cost would rise steeply. A 10,000-foot runway 300 feet wide costs little under £1 million. The need to devise new landing techniques and to retrain pilots is acknowledged in official references to this study, but emphasis is laid on the "unlimited runway" and on the "minimisation of crosswind factor" by enabling take-offs and landings to be made in any direction. This might reduce the number of aircraft that could use the runway at the same time. Only when crosswind was not of serious strength could the runway be used by six aircraft simultaneously and the claim that it would conduce to high traffic density be justified. * http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...a?dmode=source |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA: Runways come up short | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 10 | November 6th 06 02:06 AM |
Runway ID | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 55 | October 18th 05 12:53 AM |
Circular Aircraft Hangar | Jeff | Home Built | 16 | October 8th 05 11:44 PM |
Disappearing Runways | Kyle Boatright | Piloting | 5 | May 26th 05 03:19 AM |
fs2002 - increase intensity taxiway and runways' lights? | Mark Cherry | Simulators | 0 | September 23rd 03 01:08 AM |