If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Ouch! 1/4 inch? All covered with resin this would be fairly heavy,
methinks. What does one canoe weigh? The fuselage would probably be roughly double that, plus formers., hardware, ...." A 16 foot cedar strip canoe, with seats and all the trimming is under 50 pounds. Remember the resin is not just slopped on. The strength is from the cross grains of the fabric used. This is very light. Just enough resin is used to cover the fabric. A one person kayak ought to have about the same total material as the Bowlus fuselage and it would be about 40 pounds. The inside of the fuselage could use carbon fiber or other cloth material, which is stronger and lighter (it is opaque, so you would not want to use that on the outside). You could probably use Kevlar on the inside, if you thought someone might be shooting at your Bowlus. Attachment points would add weight, but the total weight would still be reasonable. My cedar strip canoe gets abused regularly. I have dragged it 1/4 mile over a gravel bar. Once, when removing it from the top of my vehicle, a gust of wind caught it and ripped it out of my helper's hands. The canoe came crashing down on my vehicle, leaving a large dent in the vehicle, then crashed to the asphalt. I inspected it and found no problems. We then launched it and went 85 miles on a week long canoe trip. I do not abuse my aircraft like I do my canoe. Refinishing is easy. I once bet my neighbor I could refinish my 16 foot canoe in less than 10 minutes. I sanded for 3 minutes, whisked off with an old t shirt, then put an old white sock over a rubber glove and dipped it in spar varnish, covering the entire canoe in about 4 minutes. I made the 10 minutes easily and, while not perfect, it looked good from 10 feet - and ready to get abused again. And, I got a beer from my neighbor. Colin |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
I'm pretty sure that the process would be to heavy for the strength it would provide, unless it were modified to provide several very thin crossing layers, all of which woul have to be tightly glued to each other I'm no expert in (or any field) but several people have mentioned about the lack of strength a single layer plywood would have and you'd need several layers (ad various angles) etc etc. Yet the most common new "core" constructions uses styrofoam for a core, I'd think the plywood at almost any thickness would be stronger. The reason for use the plywood would be for the looks (at least that's my guess). John |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
UltraJohn
thlink.net: I'm pretty sure that the process would be to heavy for the strength it would provide, unless it were modified to provide several very thin crossing layers, all of which woul have to be tightly glued to each other I'm no expert in (or any field) but several people have mentioned about the lack of strength a single layer plywood would have and you'd need several layers (ad various angles) etc etc. Yet the most common new "core" constructions uses styrofoam for a core, I'd think the plywood at almost any thickness would be stronger. The reason for use the plywood would be for the looks (at least that's my guess). Well, ultimately the wood would be for looks. I could easily make a strong fuse for this using plywood. While i was at it I could clean up the aerodynamics and use carbon fibre for the wing spars. The added strength would enable a longer, thinner wing and I could probably delete the struts into the bargain! Thing is, it wouldn't be a Baby Albatross anymore. Ithink you're confused about what is meant by single layer. A single layer wouldn't be plywood, it'd be one layer of a sheet of plywood. It' be a ply after layers were glued together. I can't see foam being used succesfully as a core in this design either. Either I have to use the built up scarfed panels method or figure a way to make a thin plywood teardrop with a farily tight radius. Seems possible to make a three or four ply lamination using single veneers set at angles to each other wrapping four inch or so veneer strips over a male mold one at a time and trimming to match it's neighbor. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"COLIN LAMB"
thlink.net: "Ouch! 1/4 inch? All covered with resin this would be fairly heavy, methinks. What does one canoe weigh? The fuselage would probably be roughly double that, plus formers., hardware, ...." A 16 foot cedar strip canoe, with seats and all the trimming is under 50 pounds. Remember the resin is not just slopped on. The strength is from the cross grains of the fabric used. This is very light. Just enough resin is used to cover the fabric. A one person kayak ought to have about the same total material as the Bowlus fuselage and it would be about 40 pounds. The inside of the fuselage could use carbon fiber or other cloth material, which is stronger and lighter (it is opaque, so you would not want to use that on the outside). You could probably use Kevlar on the inside, if you thought someone might be shooting at your Bowlus. Attachment points would add weight, but the total weight would still be reasonable. My cedar strip canoe gets abused regularly. I have dragged it 1/4 mile over a gravel bar. Once, when removing it from the top of my vehicle, a gust of wind caught it and ripped it out of my helper's hands. The canoe came crashing down on my vehicle, leaving a large dent in the vehicle, then crashed to the asphalt. I inspected it and found no problems. We then launched it and went 85 miles on a week long canoe trip. I do not abuse my aircraft like I do my canoe. Refinishing is easy. I once bet my neighbor I could refinish my 16 foot canoe in less than 10 minutes. I sanded for 3 minutes, whisked off with an old t shirt, then put an old white sock over a rubber glove and dipped it in spar varnish, covering the entire canoe in about 4 minutes. I made the 10 minutes easily and, while not perfect, it looked good from 10 feet - and ready to get abused again. And, I got a beer from my neighbor. Hmm, i'd have to experiment with that one a bit. It doesn't sound right to me, but I'm prepared to be amazed! God knows it's happened to me plenty of times before... |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:47:53 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote: is not intrisically beautiful - wood is. How about a normal composite layup with a mahogany veneer on the next to last layer covered by fiberglas for pretty. Ed Sullivan |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
How about a normal composite layup with a mahogany veneer on the next
to last layer covered by fiberglas for pretty. Ed Sullivan That's interesting. I've read that most composites must be painted white to reflect heat that could damage the foam. Do you think you could get by without the white paint? |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Earlier, LCT Paintball wrote:
That's interesting. I've read that most composites must be painted white to reflect heat that could damage the foam. Do you think you could get by without the white paint? Well, there are resins available that will take the heat. The trouble is that they're not commonly used in the home workshop environment. High-temp epoxies tend to require special high-temp curing. I think there are also vinylesters that take high temps okay, although I understand they can be tricky to work with. They also eat styrofoam, so you can't use them on Rutan-type construction. And, like you say, styrofoam also has a fairly low service temperature. But other core foams like Divynicell (rigid PVC) does come in high-temperature formulations, and is compatible with vinylester. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
The greatness of the Wright Brothers was that they were not limited by what
they did not know. The Bowlus was a unique approach to flight, The design lends itself to learning skills to make a modern replacement using either rekindled or entirely new process. Colin |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"COLIN LAMB"
thlink.net: The greatness of the Wright Brothers was that they were not limited by what they did not know. The Bowlus was a unique approach to flight, The design lends itself to learning skills to make a modern replacement using either rekindled or entirely new process. True, vbut it wasn't exactly groundbreaking technology in 1938, either. A modern replacement's been done. I want a fairly close replica.. When i talked to Steven DuPont abou tit, he said "What do you want to build a piece of **** like that for? I'm building an HP18! Build one of those." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nut/thread securing compound | nauga | Home Built | 7 | April 22nd 04 07:56 AM |
Randolph Wing Walk Compound | Larryskydives | Owning | 7 | March 7th 04 09:44 PM |
Plywood | Kathi Jo | Home Built | 3 | January 12th 04 10:48 PM |
Somebody Terrified of Compound Curves ---- Or Just Lazy | Larry Smith | Home Built | 8 | October 31st 03 02:40 PM |
Substitute for Mahogany plywood | Kelvin & Janice Rempel | Home Built | 1 | September 5th 03 08:02 PM |