A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which Ultralight to build.....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 4th 07, 03:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
patrick mitchel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Which Ultralight to build.....

how bout the flitplane from ed fisher


  #12  
Old June 4th 07, 07:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Which Ultralight to build.....

("patrick mitchel" wrote)
how bout the flitplane from ed fisher



http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/flitplane.html
The Flitplane

http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/h...ltralight.html
Home Despot Ultralight ......"Motor Glider 101"

A: Why not name it 103? (Stall speed. Drat!)
B: I like different, and this is different!!!

(From the link)
Power is provided by two 10 HP Tecumseh motors are mounted directly onto two
by two's, hollowed out in the center with 1/8 inch plywood on the side. No
rubber mounts are used for the engines, but it would be a good idea. Power
from the two 10 HP engines was transferred directly to the props, no gear
reduction was used. The props for the prototype were homemade and were
"whittled out of wood." They were redesigned several times until optimum
performance was reached. The wings have a plywood main spar, the ribs are
Styrofoam, and 1.7-ounce Dacron sail cloth is used as a covering material.
According the Jack he has "over 50 years of experience building planes."

The plane shown here had about 7 hours on it with the last flight made the
week prior to the show where it was on display. Jack reports that it fly's
along at about 40 to 45 mph. When asked how much the average person would
have invested in materials - the reply was "if you go down and buy
everything from Home Depot, the average person will have about $1,000
invested in engines and materials. However, the builder will, carve his own
props or buy some commercially produced." Of course materials like the 4130
steel tubing, sail cloth, etc will have to be sourced out somewhere else.

http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/index.html
Ok, the subs are COOL!


Montblack


  #13  
Old June 4th 07, 09:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 289
Default Which Ultralight to build.....

"Montblack" wrote:

http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/index.html


Tecumseh motors cost more than they used to...

Like alot of things...
  #14  
Old June 4th 07, 10:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Which Ultralight to build.....


"Montblack" wrote

http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/index.html
Ok, the subs are COOL!


No doubt! I want one of the luxury 213' luxury models!
--
Jim in NC


  #15  
Old June 5th 07, 05:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 217
Default Which Ultralight to build.....


Montblack wrote:
("patrick mitchel" wrote)
how bout the flitplane from ed fisher



http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/flitplane.html
The Flitplane

http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/h...ltralight.html
Home Despot Ultralight ......"Motor Glider 101"

A: Why not name it 103? (Stall speed. Drat!)
B: I like different, and this is different!!!

(From the link)
Power is provided by two 10 HP Tecumseh motors are mounted directly onto two
by two's, ....


IIRC it also weighs more than 400 lbs, nowhere close to being
a FAR 103 Ultralight.

That's why he calls it a 'Motorglider', not an Ultralight.

OTOH if you have (or can get) a glider license with a self-launch
endorsement then a motorglider may be a better choice than
a FAR 103 ultralight.

--

FF

  #16  
Old June 5th 07, 08:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Which Ultralight to build.....

wrote)
OTOH if you have (or can get) a glider license with a self-launch
endorsement then a motorglider may be a better choice than a FAR 103
ultralight.



This is a hoot - AND A MUST READ!!! g

http://edburkhead.com/Challenger/gli...torglider1.htm
Experimental Glider? YES!!

IIRC it also weighs more than 400 lbs, nowhere close to being
a FAR 103 Ultralight.

That's why he calls it a 'Motorglider', not an Ultralight.


As a 'Motorglider':
(ii) Maximum weight does not exceed 850 kg (1874 pounds);
and
(iii) The maximum weight to wing span squared (w/b2) does not exceed 3.0
kg/M2 (0.62 lb./ft.2).

500 lbs MTOW
and
28.5 ft wingspan = 812 (wing span squared)

500 lbs MTOW (/) 812 = 0.61576 lb./ft.2

....which does not exceed 0.62!

So yes, it is a motorglider

....IF the MTOW is 500 lbs
....or we go with longer wings
....or we follow the first link. g

http://www.usppa.org/Resources/FARs/part103_far.htm
(Part 103)

Home Depot Ultralight: aka "Motor Glider 101"
http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/h...ltralight.html


Specifications:

Empty Weight: 254 lbs
Stall Speed: 30 mph
Cruise Speed: 55 mph @ 2600 rpm.
Fuel Capacity: 5 US Gallons.
Wing Span: 28' 6"
Gross Weight: Not established, however pilot flew prototype with 5 gallons
fuel, pilot weight 225 lbs.

Wing Chord: 5' 0"

Gross Wing Area: 142 1/2 sq. ft.
Dihedral: 3" from Fuselage to Wing Tip.


Tail Span: 6' 6"
LOA: 15' 8"

Height: 6' 0"
Wheel Track: 4' 10" - Center to Center

Maximum HP: Not Established

Prototype Power: (2) Tecumseh 10hp 4 Stroke Engines or (2) 227 Rotax.

Endurance: (2) Techunesh engines consume approx. 1 gph.

Landing Speed: 35 mph.

Landing Rollout: 100'

Rate of Climb: Slow but steady with (2) 10 hp motors. Will maintain level
flight on one engine.


Bad Montblack, Bad!
Too much to do today to play anymore on the Groups :-(



  #17  
Old June 5th 07, 11:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Which Ultralight to build.....


That's why he calls it a 'Motorglider', not an Ultralight.

OTOH if you have (or can get) a glider license with a self-launch
endorsement then a motorglider may be a better choice than
a FAR 103 ultralight.


That would have to be in the amateur built experimental classification, and
not even as a light sport plan (thus needing a regular glider ticket, not
LSP) because of the two engines, right?

Then, you get to the definition of the span to weight requirements of a
motorglider, which are not easy to meet. I do not think it meets the
requirements for a motorglider, by a long shot.

I'm not sure where this plane would fall, except as a twin engine
experimental amateur built. You would need a regular PP ticket, (or higher)
with a twin engine endorsement, I would think.
--
Jim in NC


  #18  
Old June 5th 07, 11:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Which Ultralight to build.....


"Montblack" wrote

This is a hoot - AND A MUST READ!!! g

http://edburkhead.com/Challenger/gli...torglider1.htm
Experimental Glider? YES!!


I predict that if many people start using this option, it is a loophole that
will quickly be regulated out of existence.

Interesting, indeed.
--
Jim in NC


  #19  
Old June 6th 07, 01:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Which Ultralight to build.....

("Morgans" wrote)
Then, you get to the definition of the span to weight requirements of a
motorglider, which are not easy to meet. I do not think it meets the
requirements for a motorglider, by a long shot.



(Reposted in case someone didn't want to slog through my other post.)

As a 'Motorglider':
(ii) Maximum weight does not exceed 850 kg (1874 pounds);
and
(iii) The maximum weight to wing span squared (w/b2) does not exceed 3.0
kg/M2 (0.62 lb./ft.2).

500 lbs MTOW
and
28.5 ft wingspan = 812 (wing span squared)

500 lbs MTOW (/) 812 = 0.61576 lb./ft.2

....which does not exceed 0.62!

So yes, it is a motorglider

....IF the MTOW is 500 lbs
....or we go with longer wings
....or we follow the first link. g

http://www.usppa.org/Resources/FARs/part103_far.htm
(Part 103)

Home Depot Ultralight: aka "Motor Glider 101"
http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/h...ltralight.html

Specifications:

Empty Weight: 254 lbs
Stall Speed: 30 mph
Cruise Speed: 55 mph @ 2600 rpm.
Fuel Capacity: 5 US Gallons.
Wing Span: 28' 6"

Gross Weight: Not established, however pilot flew prototype with 5 gallons
fuel, pilot weight 225 lbs.


Montblack


  #20  
Old June 6th 07, 02:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.ultralight,rec.aviation.homebuilt
WC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Which Ultralight to build.....


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("patrick mitchel" wrote)
how bout the flitplane from ed fisher



http://www.digitalmarketingusa.com/flitplane.html
The Flitplane


Looks like a good possibility, especially for a first attempt. What are the
pros and cons?

Searching for plans, various places are selling them (Raceair, Midwest
Engineering..) Who owns the rights?

WayneC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ultralight seaplane Friedrich Ostertag Piloting 13 September 16th 05 03:37 AM
Sparrowhawk Ultralight [email protected] Soaring 26 June 15th 05 07:22 PM
Ultralight? dlevy Owning 3 September 1st 04 04:27 PM
Ultralight costs Bob Martin Home Built 1 January 1st 04 09:34 PM
RV Quick Build build times... [email protected] Home Built 2 December 17th 03 03:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.