A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Practical IFR Question (for centre controllers)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 03, 03:23 AM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Practical IFR Question (for centre controllers)

This weekend, I'm flying almost due south 340 nm from Ottawa to
Philadelphia, as I mentioned in a separate posting. Inevitably, the legs of
my planned flight zigzag around a track of 180 deg M, some slightly on the
east side, and some slightly on the west. Consider this part of the trip,
all on V29:

CORTA-CFB: 198 deg M, 31 nm
CFB-LVZ: 169 deg M, 57 nm
LVZ-ETX: 190 deg M, 42 nm
ETX-PTW: 174 deg M, 22 nm

Assume I hit CORTA at 6000 ft. Will Centre drop me to 5,000 ft at CFB, then
bring me back to 6,000 ft at LVZ, then drop me back to 5,000 ft at ETX
(actually, I'd probably be starting a descent by then anyway)? Or will they
likely just leave me at 6,000? It's not a big deal of course -- mainly just
a matter of curiosity. Toronto Centre has never been too concerned about my
flying WAFDOF for turbulence or (risk of) icing, but our airways are not all
that busy below 10K ft outside of terminal areas, especially in IMC.


All the best,


David

  #2  
Old December 3rd 03, 01:31 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Megginson wrote:
This weekend, I'm flying almost due south 340 nm from Ottawa to
Philadelphia, as I mentioned in a separate posting. Inevitably, the
legs of my planned flight zigzag around a track of 180 deg M, some
slightly on the east side, and some slightly on the west. Consider this
part of the trip, all on V29:

CORTA-CFB: 198 deg M, 31 nm
CFB-LVZ: 169 deg M, 57 nm
LVZ-ETX: 190 deg M, 42 nm
ETX-PTW: 174 deg M, 22 nm

Assume I hit CORTA at 6000 ft. Will Centre drop me to 5,000 ft at CFB,
then bring me back to 6,000 ft at LVZ, then drop me back to 5,000 ft at
ETX (actually, I'd probably be starting a descent by then anyway)? Or
will they likely just leave me at 6,000? It's not a big deal of course
-- mainly just a matter of curiosity. Toronto Centre has never been too
concerned about my flying WAFDOF for turbulence or (risk of) icing, but
our airways are not all that busy below 10K ft outside of terminal
areas, especially in IMC.


I'm not a centre (or center ;-)) controller.

Predicting what center will do is just a game of chance.

My guess would be there are letters of agreement between Philly approach and the
adjacent airspace owners that specify the altitude where they'll take incoming
traffic, and that will be the determining factor, rather than the exact
direction of flight at the moment of handoff. If you fly into a large airport
like PHL a few times you'll begin to see a pattern.

Other than that, I don't know any way to learn what the LOAs say. I guess you
could ask on frequency if they're not too busy, or phone up the TRACON. Maybe
they'll tell you something useful, and maybe not. I don't think it's too useful
trying to predict assigned altitudes. Ultimately you'll fly whatever they assign.

In general, when you have a planned flight that takes you back and forth between
slighly east and slightly west, you will not be assigned different altitudes
every time you change heading, in my experience.

Remove SHIRT to reply directly.
Dave

  #3  
Old December 3rd 03, 01:59 PM
EDR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article
ogers.com, David
Megginson wrote:

This weekend, I'm flying almost due south 340 nm from Ottawa to
Philadelphia, as I mentioned in a separate posting. Inevitably, the legs of
my planned flight zigzag around a track of 180 deg M, some slightly on the
east side, and some slightly on the west. Consider this part of the trip,
all on V29:

CORTA-CFB: 198 deg M, 31 nm
CFB-LVZ: 169 deg M, 57 nm
LVZ-ETX: 190 deg M, 42 nm
ETX-PTW: 174 deg M, 22 nm

Assume I hit CORTA at 6000 ft. Will Centre drop me to 5,000 ft at CFB, then
bring me back to 6,000 ft at LVZ, then drop me back to 5,000 ft at ETX
(actually, I'd probably be starting a descent by then anyway)? Or will they
likely just leave me at 6,000? It's not a big deal of course -- mainly just
a matter of curiosity. Toronto Centre has never been too concerned about my
flying WAFDOF for turbulence or (risk of) icing, but our airways are not all
that busy below 10K ft outside of terminal areas, especially in IMC.


My guess is that it will depend upon other traffic along your route of
flight. If you are the only one, you will stay at the same altitude
until approach starts working you into the flow.
When there is other traffic, they will put you at an altitude that fits
the flow.
  #4  
Old December 3rd 03, 07:12 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Megginson ) wrote:

This weekend, I'm flying almost due south 340 nm from Ottawa to
Philadelphia, as I mentioned in a separate posting. Inevitably, the legs of
my planned flight zigzag around a track of 180 deg M, some slightly on the
east side, and some slightly on the west. Consider this part of the trip,
all on V29:

CORTA-CFB: 198 deg M, 31 nm
CFB-LVZ: 169 deg M, 57 nm
LVZ-ETX: 190 deg M, 42 nm
ETX-PTW: 174 deg M, 22 nm

Assume I hit CORTA at 6000 ft. Will Centre drop me to 5,000 ft at CFB, then
bring me back to 6,000 ft at LVZ, then drop me back to 5,000 ft at ETX
(actually, I'd probably be starting a descent by then anyway)? Or will they
likely just leave me at 6,000?


Dave, at those altitudes you will be talking to Syracuse Approach,
Binghamton Approach, Wilkes-Barre Approach, then I forgot. Probably NY
approach, then Philly Approach. No Centers involved.

Through those airspaces (I am based at Syracuse), I have had both
experiences. Sometimes the controllers leave me at the same altitude
throughout the entire IFR cruise (regardless of the heading), and sometimes
I have been instructed to climb/descend to the correct cruise altitude for
the direction.

What time are you flying? I'll be sure to wave to you as you pass
overhead!

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #5  
Old December 3rd 03, 07:41 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. wrote:

Dave, at those altitudes you will be talking to Syracuse Approach,
Binghamton Approach, Wilkes-Barre Approach, then I forgot. Probably NY
approach, then Philly Approach. No Centers involved.

Through those airspaces (I am based at Syracuse), I have had both
experiences. Sometimes the controllers leave me at the same altitude
throughout the entire IFR cruise (regardless of the heading), and sometimes
I have been instructed to climb/descend to the correct cruise altitude for
the direction.


Thanks -- that's excellent info. You guys are big on approach control down
there, aren't you?

What time are you flying? I'll be sure to wave to you as you pass
overhead!


Saturday or Sunday, whenever the weather looks best. I'll try to remember
to wag my wings over both SYR and ETX now (any others?).


All the best,


David

p.s. Thanks to everyone else who replied to this thread as well.

  #6  
Old December 3rd 03, 08:01 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, David Megginson said:
Thanks -- that's excellent info. You guys are big on approach control down
there, aren't you?


Depends how high you fly. The Class Cs are pretty thick on the ground in
New York, and if you stay low you'll end up talking to them rather than
Center controllers almost the whole time. I think my first flight to
Ottawa was the first time I'd talked to a Center controller.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
A fool and his money are soon flying more airplane than he can
handle.
  #7  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:30 PM
S Narayan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Megginson" wrote in message
le.rogers.com...


Saturday or Sunday, whenever the weather looks best. I'll try to remember
to wag my wings over both SYR and ETX now (any others?).


Isn't a big snow storm supposed to hit the north east this Friday-Saturday?


  #8  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:33 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "S Narayan" said:
"David Megginson" wrote in message
ble.rogers.com...
Saturday or Sunday, whenever the weather looks best. I'll try to remember
to wag my wings over both SYR and ETX now (any others?).


Isn't a big snow storm supposed to hit the north east this Friday-Saturday?


The prog charts at AOPA show the North East to be pretty clear for
Saturday and Sunday. A low over the Upper Peninsula, but no precip
until you get down to Virginia-DC-DelMarVa area. Same for Sunday. Of
course, 72 hour forecasts aren't worth much more than a wild assed guess.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Recursion: n., see Recursion.
  #9  
Old December 3rd 03, 10:39 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul Tomblin wrote:

The prog charts at AOPA show the North East to be pretty clear for
Saturday and Sunday. A low over the Upper Peninsula, but no precip
until you get down to Virginia-DC-DelMarVa area. Same for Sunday. Of
course, 72 hour forecasts aren't worth much more than a wild assed guess.


Exactly. I'm prepared to fly any time Saturday or Sunday, whenever the
weather looks best. I'll be watching the Philly area itself the closest,
but I don't mind low vis as long as there's not an icing risk.


All the best,


David

  #10  
Old December 4th 03, 02:52 PM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Megginson wrote in message ble.rogers.com...

Dave, at those altitudes you will be talking to Syracuse Approach,
Binghamton Approach, Wilkes-Barre Approach, then I forgot. Probably NY
approach, then Philly Approach. No Centers involved.


Thanks -- that's excellent info. You guys are big on approach control down
there, aren't you?


David,

It depends upon where "down here". Pretty typically a radar approach
facility will control the airspace for 40 miles around and up to 8-10K.
Class B's up to 14. It's not just Class Cs, there are a bunch of
TRSAs and even class D airports which have approach control (the latter
can be told by the R in the blue circle next to their name on a sectional
chart IF the radar is on the airport, but sometimes have no indication
I can discern).

In the NE tracons are pretty thick on the ground. A bit further west
much sparser.

Have a good trip!
Sydney
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question on Airworthiness Inspection Dave S Home Built 1 August 10th 04 05:07 AM
Question Charles S Home Built 4 April 5th 04 09:10 PM
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question jlauer Home Built 7 November 16th 03 01:51 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.