A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA pulls funding for LAAS landing systems



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 28th 04, 09:35 PM
JJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAA pulls funding for LAAS landing systems

LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here to
stay.

  #2  
Old February 28th 04, 09:37 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"JJ" wrote in message
...
LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here to
stay.


It is only the VOR bandwidth that will be freed up.

ILS is a good system.


  #3  
Old February 28th 04, 09:47 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



JJ wrote:

LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here to
stay.


They finally figured out the airlines are married to ILS, both domestically
and internationally.

  #4  
Old February 28th 04, 09:48 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tarver Engineering wrote:

"JJ" wrote in message
...
LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here to
stay.


It is only the VOR bandwidth that will be freed up.

ILS is a good system.


High-end MLS would have been better.


  #5  
Old February 28th 04, 09:51 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

"JJ" wrote in message
...
LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks

like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here

to
stay.


It is only the VOR bandwidth that will be freed up.

ILS is a good system.


High-end MLS would have been better.


The MLS systems with GPS substituted for DME work well, but I don't see how
to justify the expense of the change.


  #7  
Old February 29th 04, 02:44 AM
Richard Hertz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't have that kind of money to put the equipment in my plane.

ILS system seems to be fine for me.


wrote in message ...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

"JJ" wrote in message
...
LAAS (Local Area Augmentation System) was to provide CAT 2 and 3 ILS
capability at major airports by fine tuning GPS and up loading
correction signals to aircraft. FAA has canceled the program. Looks

like
the ground based ILS systems once slated for removal by 2010 are here

to
stay.


It is only the VOR bandwidth that will be freed up.

ILS is a good system.


High-end MLS would have been better.




  #8  
Old February 29th 04, 03:24 AM
Javier Henderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Noel writes:

except in for the problems with ILS in Europe...


What's the problem with ILS approaches in Europe? Frequency congestion?

-jav
  #9  
Old February 29th 04, 03:44 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Javier Henderson
wrote:

except in for the problems with ILS in Europe...


What's the problem with ILS approaches in Europe? Frequency congestion?


yes. and interference from FM radio stations.

--
Bob Noel
  #10  
Old February 29th 04, 05:38 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Hertz" wrote in message
t...
I don't have that kind of money to put the equipment in my plane.

ILS system seems to be fine for me.


And in probably 95% of cases it's fine for everyone.


wrote in message ...


Tarver Engineering wrote:

"JJ" wrote in message


It is only the VOR bandwidth that will be freed up.

ILS is a good system.


High-end MLS would have been better.


And terribly expensive with little gain in functionality in the overwhelming
majority of implementations.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"bush flying" in the suburbs? [email protected] Home Built 85 December 28th 04 11:04 PM
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 Ghost Home Built 2 October 28th 03 04:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.