![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "red12049" wrote in message ... Juan If you have proof that those children are Chuck's, please post it or provide a link. Did I say they are Chuck's children? chuckle If you do not, then this question is not germane to this thread, and is a Zoom tactic at its' finest. ROFL! Let me clue you in on a little secret: I don't give a flying intercourse what you think is germane or not, sonny. Shoo. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Truth 101. First it was one truck, then it was two, first he said he took
it, now he says he will. It's called "squirming, lying and backpedalling." Class dismissed. "red12049" wrote in message ... Juan, I like to think that I am of at least average intelligence. I read the quoted post, and I still do not understand the point you are trying to make. For the sake of those that might be in the same position, please explain your accusations in detail so that we may follow along. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... I can assure you that I don't have any children who had to be dealt with in the Juvenile Court system ,so what's your point? You sure about that? ![]() Just to help you my sons names are Chuck Jr, Dave ,Ted and Don. I don't care what you named your sons. Dana is a female ![]() I can't believe how much like zoom you are that your capable of sinking to that level. You shouldn't have a problem with that, seeing as you're such a lowlife you couldn't help but talk about my kid in the thread. What's wrong, boy, don't like being forcefed your own bull****? chuckle It's all about credibility, the kind you don't have. |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... ROFL boy when it comes to stupidity you've just spent 2 weeks proving that your the Grand Master of acting stupid. Better than proving that you are the Pathological Liar of Cleveland. It's all about the credibility you don't have. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Funny you should say that but that's just what I'm doing. jaun laid a big egg by they way by attributing some none existent family members to me and his reference to Juvenile court. He's been very careful up to now but he crossed the line. What line, the court line? ROFL! What really ****es him and zoom off is that they really can't find anything ,hard as they try. We don't have to, you do a good job of leading everyone to the facts. All I have to do is follow the reek of lies. It's all about the credibility you don't have. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... I can't believe that your that dense, I have the title but even I can't produce proof of something that didn't happen yet. You said you've taken your truck(s) to SnF since 1999. Squirming and backpedalling will not get you out of this one. It's all about the credibility you don't have. ![]() |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Ousterhout got??? Somehow you don't seem the type to strike fear into the hearts of anyone let alone Ousterhout. So check Google. There was no response from him after I set him straight. It's all about the credibility you don't have. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "andy asberry" wrote in message ... One Juan Jimenez, a self-proclaimed aviation writer, has publicly stated that the proprietor of an airplane manufacturing company has lied AGAIN. That indicates at least two lies. A pattern, a habitual liar. As a consumer who is contemplating the purchase of an airplane of the type manufactured by the said proprietor, I certainly don't want to get involved with a habitual liar. Therefore, I won't consider buying from him. Of course, if Mr. Jimenez is wrong or has lied himself, I would think the manufacturer would be entitled to compensation for lost revenue and damaged reputation. If you have any doubts as to whether or not I am an aviation writer, go to http://www.aero-news.net/SearchForm.cfm and type "jimenez" in the first field on the form, then click Search and read. It's that simple. What you will see covers only part of 2002 and 2003. All Chuck has to do is post the evidence he has that answers my simple question, and which he implied he has when he challenged me to a "bet". Or he can admit he lied about that too and doesn't have any evidence. It's that simple. Remember as well that that little boy scout pocket knife you're suggesting Chuck should wave around cuts both ways. ![]() Juan |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan,
First off, I give you the courtesy of addressing you by the name you go by here. Please afford me that same courtesy. Next, no, you did not SAY that they were Chucks, but the IMPLICATION was certainly there... go back and read the definition of McCarthyism. I have a good friend who is an attorney that I showed this whole thread to. According to him, if this mess were in a print media, there would be great grounds for a suit against you, and he would take that case in a blink. He also stated that if it could be shown that these emails were on the originating computer, that there might also be grounds for a suit, but that electronic law was out of his area of expertise. Finally, again, please afford me the courtesy I have afforded you. I have as much right here as anyone else. Tell someone else to "shoo". As I said in an earlier post, all about your tactics.... Red "Juan.Jimenez" wrote in message news:KeHlb.3241$Tr4.21142@attbi_s03... "red12049" wrote in message ... Juan If you have proof that those children are Chuck's, please post it or provide a link. Did I say they are Chuck's children? chuckle If you do not, then this question is not germane to this thread, and is a Zoom tactic at its' finest. ROFL! Let me clue you in on a little secret: I don't give a flying intercourse what you think is germane or not, sonny. Shoo. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... I couldn't agree more...Still getting ducks in a row :-) Don't need quacks. All you need is a simple title and a simple piece of proof. It's all about the credibility you don't have. my stepmother-in-law has a great recipe for roast duck chuckle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what's a good country for a homebuilt aircraft? | Lukas | Home Built | 17 | September 25th 03 06:53 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |
Good degreaser? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 15 | July 17th 03 05:49 PM |
War Stories: Good degreaser? | B2431 | Home Built | 1 | July 16th 03 03:18 PM |