Presidential TFRs

The protest is what's legal, contrary to what you claimed.

Mxsmanic wrote:

Newps writes:


Which is a good question, but the fact remains it is legal.


They've never been subjected to a test of their constitutionality, as
far as I know. Then again, not too many people worry about the
Constitution anymore--it just interferes with the War on Terror (a/k/a
War on Drugs, a/k/a War on Eastasia, or is it Eurasia?).

I am not a bozo. I am a cabal. Where have you been?

Morgans wrote:

"Newps" wrote in message
news:8hdpb.87467$Tr4.224855@attbi_s03...


And anyone who saw the tape of the torture going on in Iraq that was all
over the news this week here in the States would not question our going

in.

Do yourself a favor and killfil this bozo, and anyone else coming in here
spouting political agenda. I am here to get along with everyone, as long as
our common ground is aviation. Stop replys to this crap, and soon it will
go away. Too bad some do not have enough self discipline to do that.

Newps writes:

The protest is what's legal, contrary to what you claimed.

Not if it is assimilated with a terrorist act.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:53:40 GMT, Newps wrote:

And anyone who saw the tape of the torture going on in Iraq that was all
over the news this week here in the States would not question our going in.

at least the US propaganda machinery is working, eh? :-)



the only news from Iraq we daily see is some sort of this:
- some US soldiers killed and wounded
- red cross etc. leaving the country
- some idiots saying "_now_ after the war" and don't realize that there is
still war (at least officially)
- rebuilding does not happen
- religious fundamentalist winning ground

[...personal statement snipped...]

#m

--
http://www.refuseandresist.org/

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 21:30:07 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:

If the U.S. government would just distribute tapes of its own torture
sessions, we wouldn't have to go to Iraq to find them.

you mean like this? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cia+artichoke

#m

--
http://www.refuseandresist.org/

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 15:40:21 -0500, Morgans wrote:

Thanks for making easy to make these tough decisions.
Plonk
See what I mean?

me too, me too. pleeeeeeezzze. will you also plonk me?

#m
--
http://www.refuseandresist.org/

"Newps" wrote in message
news:A%dpb.86585$HS4.720582@attbi_s01...
I am not a bozo. I am a cabal. Where have you been?


What you say may be true, may not be. I WILL NOT argue it here. This is
aviation, not politics, world opinion, or anything else. I will choose to
ignore you and your propaganda, from now on.

Good day.

On 2 Nov 2003 09:37:01 -0700, (blanche cohen)
wrote:

wrote:
Perhaps it would be more appropriate for the government to establish a
30 nm NO-DRIVE ZONE around Jr.

A modified version of this already exists.

As this incident demonstrates, such a security measure is as
unrentable as the presidential TFRs in its effectiveness.

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:17:44 +0100, Mxsmanic
wrote:

I doubt it. Most democracies self-destruct in this way, as people trade
freedoms for security. Sometimes it's planes hitting towers, sometimes
it's burning of the Reichstag, but the powers that be always find
excuses to tighten the leash ...

Do implications count?
http://members.tripod.com/~goodwin_2/law.html

writes:

Do implications count?

I wondered that myself, but the analogy seemed so apt ...

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.