The Angry White Man

Feel better now?

In article ,
Steve Foley wrote:
"TheRealDeal" wrote in message
...
I believe the vast majority of private pilots in America fit this class
group.

I do not.

Me neither.

--
-Ed Falk,
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article ,
Steve Foley wrote:
"TheRealDeal" wrote in message
...
I believe the vast majority of private pilots in America fit this class
group.
I do not.

Me neither.


If the Federal Guvment and FAA keeps squeezing GA until you
can't AFFORD to fly you will be angry.

Wanna Bet?

The way the Fed goons will do it is with subtle but ever
increasing fuel tax. They will FORCE private pilots to

1. QUIT
2. BE RICH
3. MOVE TO SOUTH DAKOTA
4. FLY ON BATTERIES

You will be sacrificed and your airspace will be SEIZED for
the airline and air cargo business.

Wanna Bet?

Then you will be ****ED not just angry

So go ahead vote McSame or the Hilldabeast or Osama Obama
a.k.a.SOWS(Same Old Washington ****) and watch the FED GOONS
seize your **** and your flying RIGHTS bit by bit, piece by
piece.

Keep defending the FAA (Fox in the HenHouse). You will see.
But then it will be too late.

I got to go punch a hole in the sky Adios

The3rdRail wrote in :

Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article
, Steve
Foley wrote:
"TheRealDeal" wrote in message
...
I believe the vast majority of private pilots in America fit this
class group.
I do not.

Me neither.


If the Federal Guvment and FAA keeps squeezing GA until you
can't AFFORD to fly you will be angry.

Wanna Bet?

The way the Fed goons will do it is with subtle but ever
increasing fuel tax. They will FORCE private pilots to

1. QUIT
2. BE RICH
3. MOVE TO SOUTH DAKOTA
4. FLY ON BATTERIES


Is this an A la Carte menu?

Bertie

On Feb 23, 1:04 pm, " wrote:
On Feb 23, 12:45 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:



I think war is usually a business mistake, nowadays.
Ken

Right, and that is always the overriding concern that trumps the war
option, I suppose?

Certainly that was the case in 1861, 1914, and 1939 -- years devoid of
business interests.


Every time that argument comes up, I'm more and more tempted to go
digging through the college textbooks I have in storage until I find
one reading that mentions a very compelling book, written by a well-
respected economist, that was very popular in its time. It carefully
explained how, due to the interconnected nature of international
trade, widespread war was now impossible because it would call too
much economic damage to everyone involved.

Written in 1912.

-JTD

On Feb 25, 12:29 pm, Jeff Dougherty
wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:04 pm, " wrote:

On Feb 23, 12:45 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

I think war is usually a business mistake, nowadays.
Ken

Right, and that is always the overriding concern that trumps the war
option, I suppose?

Certainly that was the case in 1861, 1914, and 1939 -- years devoid of
business interests.

Every time that argument comes up, I'm more and more tempted to go
digging through the college textbooks I have in storage until I find
one reading that mentions a very compelling book, written by a well-
respected economist, that was very popular in its time. It carefully
explained how, due to the interconnected nature of international
trade, widespread war was now impossible because it would call too
much economic damage to everyone involved.

Written in 1912.

-JTD

Messy divorces are proof that emotions trumps economic interest every
time.

Dan

On Feb 25, 9:29 am, Jeff Dougherty
wrote:
On Feb 23, 1:04 pm, " wrote:

On Feb 23, 12:45 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

I think war is usually a business mistake, nowadays.
Ken

Right, and that is always the overriding concern that trumps the war
option, I suppose?

Certainly that was the case in 1861, 1914, and 1939 -- years devoid of
business interests.

Every time that argument comes up, I'm more and more tempted to go
digging through the college textbooks I have in storage until I find
one reading that mentions a very compelling book, written by a well-
respected economist, that was very popular in its time. It carefully
explained how, due to the interconnected nature of international
trade, widespread war was now impossible because it would call too
much economic damage to everyone involved.
Written in 1912.
-JTD

That's a case of too much power, not enough brains.
1% of those in control, say we must build 1000's of
ICBM's because the other are guys are.
Yet, 99% of the people on both sides have not motive
or desire to harm the other guys, apart from being
told they should.
Ken

The3rdRail wrote:


I got to go punch a hole in the sky Adios
jeezuz I wish someone would punch a hole in your F**kin' head.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200802/1

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in news:050125fe-1edc-4441-
:



That's a case of too much power, not enough brains.
1% of those in control, say we must build 1000's of
ICBM's because the other are guys are.
Yet, 99% of the people on both sides have not motive
or desire to harm the other guys, apart from being
told they should.


What bout fuedin'?

Bertie

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in news:804544c766b81@uwe:

The3rdRail wrote:


I got to go punch a hole in the sky Adios
jeezuz I wish someone would punch a hole in your F**kin' head.


Too late!

bertie