A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 9th 06, 08:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

In article , Henry J Cobb
wrote:

Harry Andreas wrote:
Explain please how jammers are needed to operate stealth aircraft?


https://www.aef.org/magazine/Dec2004/1204electron.asp
In fact, the prospective threat shapes up as being so great that even
stealth aircraft usually will get jamming support.


That link does not work anymore.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
  #12  
Old June 9th 06, 08:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

In article , Henry J Cobb
wrote:

Harry Andreas wrote:
Explain please how jammers are needed to operate stealth aircraft?


https://www.aef.org/magazine/Dec2004/1204electron.asp
In fact, the prospective threat shapes up as being so great that even
stealth aircraft usually will get jamming support.


Your quote above (and it should have had quotation marks around it) ,
while in the article, was completely unsupported by facts, data, or analysis.

They also specifically said that jammers were not needed for stealth aircraft,
although they might be used by stealth aircraft in some cases.

Despite what they stated in that article, I wouldn't run off thinking that
stealth aircraft "need" jammers to operate, certainly not in the near or
middle future.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
  #13  
Old June 9th 06, 10:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

Harry Andreas wrote:
Your quote above (and it should have had quotation marks around it) ,
while in the article, was completely unsupported by facts, data, or analysis.

They also specifically said that jammers were not needed for stealth aircraft,
although they might be used by stealth aircraft in some cases.

Despite what they stated in that article, I wouldn't run off thinking that
stealth aircraft "need" jammers to operate, certainly not in the near or
middle future.


http://www.afa.org/magazine/june2001/0601stealth.asp
A prominent criticism of both the F-117 and the B-2 in Kosovo
centered on the fact that, even though both were billed as radar
evaders, both types were supported by jamming aircraft. This was not
supposed to be necessary.

Jumper said bluntly that the F-117s and B-2s "don't need escort
jammers." However, senior USAF officials acknowledge that the stealth
aircraft certainly did coordinate missions with jamming aircraft,
particularly the EA-6Bs operated jointly by the Air Force, Navy, and
Marine Corps, to increase the safety margin when attacking tough
targets.


-HJC
  #14  
Old June 10th 06, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CRS VIEWS THE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:26:34 -0700, "Joe Delphi"
wrote:


Anyone know the projected first flight date of the F/A-18G ?

I think they are hoping for August.

--Rolf

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GAO: Joint Strike Fighter: Management of the Technology Transfer Process. Mike Naval Aviation 0 March 16th 06 02:38 PM
U.S. Air Force to purchase 1,763 LOCKHEED MARTIN F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets for $245 billion Larry Dighera Military Aviation 0 July 22nd 04 06:06 AM
Joint Strike Fighter under attack on Capitol Hill Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 2 March 27th 04 08:07 PM
Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 19th 04 09:19 PM
Navy, Marine leaders urge no delay in Joint Strike Fighter program Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 0 March 18th 04 04:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.