If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
On Jan 24, 8:06*am, Wallace Berry wrote:
Spratt must be doing several hundred rpm at this point. Charlie hated unnecessary radio chatter at contests . I can remember him chastising the offenders: "You bark like a bunch of dogs..." --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- Allow me to suggest solution to most of these problems. Most of the problems seem to be from lack of frequencies in the VHF band. Why bother? Those who want to chat air to air can just go purchase those spiffy family band walky talky type radios for well under $100. They have a lot of frequencies, discrete calling, VOX, headphones, microphones, and who knows what else. And they're legal. I use them a lot for other activties. Sure, it may take a little bit of effort to find some clear channels but it can be done. At 5 watts they would have enough range for a reasonable distance in the air. Or have them use their cell phones. I don't see why we would have to congest our very limited frequencies. I am very leery of flying in a contest that either has constant radio chatter or a significant number of contestants just turning their radios off to get away from said chatter. If it gets too chattery I suspect I will quit competing. I view this as a very serious safety issue. Those who want to talk can find ways to do it without mucking up the airbands the rest of us monitor. Remember the ras discussions about using cellphones and other communication technology? Let's think just a little bit outside the (aviation radio) box. This isn't rocket science. Tim |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
Gone are the days when 123.3 was used pretty much by gliders alone. A couple of years ago, the frequency was also allocated here in Arizona to a local commercial operator for ground to air operations. When they first came on the air, they started yelling at gliders to "get off their frequency". Even now, when they are not overpowering us with their high-power transmitters, we get users from nearby Mexico stepping all over us. Now, many of us don't use 123.3 - sticking with either our airport frequency (122.9) or 123.5.
Finding frequencies for glider/glider communications in the aircraft band is going to be a challenge. Mike |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
Snip... ...A
couple of years ago, the frequency was also allocated here in Arizona to a local commercial operator for ground to air operations. For the record...and making no claim to be an FAR/CFR anal wizard, my understanding (from my instructor and eventually from reading material over the years) has always been 123.3 has NEVER been "a glider only" frequency in the U.S. I *think* 123.5 similarly was allocated for multiple - if specific - users. Feel free to look it up. In any event, flight school use has been a written-into part of 123.3 allocation since at least 1972, I believe. Mostly, it's been ignorant glider pilots who (mistakenly) have thought of those two U.S. frequencies as "exclusively for glider pilots". I'll wager a good beer the Arizona commercial operator somehow or other selectively read/heard what he wanted to regarding others' legal right to be on 123.3! Why should glider nuts be the only misguided souls on the planet? Bob - yeah it's still winter in the northern hemisphere - W. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
Yes indeed, all the frequencies have always had multiple users, but in nearly thirty years of flying in the USA, I've experienced that 123.3 has only recently become so congested with high-power commercial users.
There is now no way that it could be used in southern Arizona for the official contest frequency because of all this congestion. Mike |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
Exactly what frequencies would the Contest Rules comittee recommend.
this is a list of the legal ones. 108.000- 112.000 MHz Aviation Terminal VOR and ILS Navigation (80 Channels) Yes 112.000- 117.950 MHz Aviation VOR Navigation (120 Channels) Yes 118.000- 136.000 MHz Aviation Communication (720 Channels) Yes 121.500 MHz Aviation Distress Yes 121.600 MHz Civil Air Patrol (Authorized use only) Yes 121.700 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 118.000- 121.400 MHz Air Traffic Control (Towers and ARTCC's) Yes 121.600 MHz Civil Air Patrol Training Beacons Yes 121.650 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.700 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.750 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.775 MHz Civil Air Patrol Training Beacons Yes 121.800 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.850 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.900 MHz Aviation Ground Control Yes 121.900 MHz Flight Schools Yes 121.957 MHz Flight Service Stations Yes 122.000 MHz Flight Advisory Service Yes 122.025- 122.675 MHz Flight Service Stations Yes 122.250 MHz Balloons Yes 122.400 MHz Flight Service Stations Yes 122.600 MHz Flight Service Stations Yes 122.700 MHz Aviation UNICOM Uncontrolled Airports Yes 122.725 MHz Aviation UNICOM Private Airports Yes 122.750 MHz Aviation Air to Air Communications Yes 122.775 MHz Air Shows & Air-to-air Communications Yes 122.800 MHz Aviation UNICOM Uncontrolled Airports Yes 122.825 MHz ARINC Yes 122.850 MHz Aviation Multicom Yes 122.875 MHz ARINC Yes 122.900 MHz Aviation UNICOM Uncontrolled Airports and Search and Rescue Training Yes 122.925 MHz Aviation UNICOM/Multicom/Air Shows Yes 122.950 MHz Aviation UNICOM Controlled Airports Yes 122.975 MHz Aviation UNICOM Yes 122.975 MHz Airplane to Airplane (high altitude airliners) Yes 123.000 MHz Aviation UNICOM Yes 123.050 MHz Aviation UNICOM Yes 123.050 MHz Aviation Heliports Yes 123.075 MHz Aviation UNICOM Yes 123.075 MHz Aviation Heliports Yes 123.000 MHz Aviation UNICOM Uncontrolled airports Yes 123.025 MHz Helicopters Air-to-air Communications Yes 123.050 MHz Aviation UNICO Heliports Yes 123.075 MHz Aviation UNICOM Heliports Yes 123.100 MHz Search and Rescue/Civil Air Patrol Yes 123.125- 123.476 MHz Flight Test Yes 123.200 MHz Flight Schools Yes 123.300 MHz Flight Schools & Balloons Yes 123.325 MHz Air Shows Yes 123.350 MHz NASA Yes 123.400 MHz Flight Schools Yes 123.425 MHz Air Shows Yes 123.450 MHz Air to Air (trans-ocean unofficial) Yes, but out of range 123.475 MHz U.S. Army Golden Knights Yes 123.500 MHz Flight Schools & Balloons Yes 123.525- 123.575 MHz Flight testing Yes 123.600- 128.800 MHz Air Traffic Control (Towers/ARTCC's) Yes 126.200 MHz Military Airport Towers Yes 128.625 MHz NASA/NOAA Research Yes 128.825- 132.000 MHz ARINC Yes 130.650 MHz Military Airlift Command Yes 134.100 MHz Military Airports - Ground Control Approach (GCA) Radar Yes 135.850 MHz Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Yes 135,950 MHz Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Yes Richard, |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
Jeezes.....
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
USA Competition Rules Changes Proposed for 2013
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:59:51 PM UTC-6, wrote:
Jeezes..... Does this rule allowing radio comms make ANY sense given the lack of frequencies available??? Sure the option is available, but good luck making any effective use of it. RC - I know the spirit of the rule is to allow limited comms between pilots for fun. But you have got to know that this WILL evolve into "teams of two" or "shark packs" whose goal will be to work together to win. As this happens, will teams going on any "available " frequency make us any friends in aviation world and with the FCC??? EY |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA 2013 Proposed Contest Rules | Juliet11[_2_] | Soaring | 1 | January 10th 13 05:09 PM |
USA 2013 Proposed Competition Rules Changes Available | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 20 | January 9th 13 10:17 AM |
2011 USA Proposed Competition Rules Changes Posted. | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 22 | December 31st 10 02:54 PM |
Proposed US Competition Rules Changes for 2010 | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | December 17th 09 05:20 PM |
2008 Proposed US Competition Rules Changes | [email protected] | Soaring | 18 | December 31st 07 07:21 PM |