If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Julian Scarfe wrote:
I think you're barking up the wrong tree here. Classic teaching of partial/limited panel involves covering an instrument and then continuing to fly without it. In the case of the Bandeirante accident, that wasn't the issue. There was still a perfectly serviceable AI in the panel, and a pilot sitting in front of it. The issue was identifying the failed instrument in a complex cockpit environment. I'm not sure I'm barking up the wrong tree. Possibly practicing flying partial panel makes little sense. OTOH, practicing partial panel *does* teach which combinations of instruments can be used to provide the same information as the missing AI. Surely this is relevant to obtaining and maintaining a good crosscheck -- and wouldn't good crosscheck be the key to identifying the failed instrument in a "complex cockpit environment"? BTW, my reading of the accident report is that they weren't certain but what both AIs had failed -- something that was certainly within statistical likelihood given the low MTBUR Cheers, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Backup vacuum pump system STC'ed for Cherokee 180 | Chuck | Owning | 6 | September 18th 04 02:30 PM |
Good AI backup, wish me luck | Robert M. Gary | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | March 1st 04 05:36 PM |
Solid State Backup AI | Dan Truesdell | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 15th 04 09:53 PM |
Gyros - which do you trust? | Julian Scarfe | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | July 27th 03 09:36 AM |
Backup gyros - which do you trust? | Dan Luke | Owning | 46 | July 17th 03 08:06 PM |