A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1 watt and 5 watt LED for Nav lights?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 18th 04, 02:45 PM
Jeff Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eric Jones wrote an nice description of leds as nav and strobe lights he

http://www.periheliondesign.com/down...ing%20LEDs.pdf

the rear and side strobes are fairly easy do with about 5 ea 5 watt luxeons

i used 6 in my tail strobe.

the required strobe intensity in the forward direction is a bit
tougher to accomplish with LEDs. still possible.

i think for my tail strobe i will uses 50% duty cycle.
not as "flashy" as a quick pulse, but actually easier see at a distance.

the human eye averages for 200 ms so for quick pulses its the
total light energy in the pulse that matters. stobes cant make long pulses
but LEDs can, so long pulses are the right choice with leds.


circuit will be like this

IRF2804
---------
| | |----parallel LEDs----Resistor----+12V
| LM555 |--------|
| | |-----gnd
---------

the 2804 is WAY overkill. it can switch 100s of amps. but its only 3 bucks,
so why not use the best.

i ordered a handful and when i get back form snf i will give the circuit a try.

-Jeff
  #12  
Old April 19th 04, 01:39 AM
Jay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'd modify the circuit like this...



|----serial LEDs(3?)----Resistor----+12V
|----serial LEDs(3?)----Resistor----+12V
|
| repeat as necessary...
|
|----serial LEDs(3?)----Resistor----+12V
--------- |----serial LEDs(3?)----Resistor----+12V
| | |
| LM555 |------|
| | |-----gnd
--------- IRF2804


By putting the LEDs in series instead of parallel you'll cut the
current drain by 2/3 (in the case of 3 leds series). Also with each
leg having its own resistor the LEDs don't have to be matched by
forward voltage.

Regards

(Jeff Peterson) wrote in message . com...
Eric Jones wrote an nice description of leds as nav and strobe lights he

http://www.periheliondesign.com/down...ing%20LEDs.pdf

the rear and side strobes are fairly easy do with about 5 ea 5 watt luxeons

i used 6 in my tail strobe.

the required strobe intensity in the forward direction is a bit
tougher to accomplish with LEDs. still possible.

i think for my tail strobe i will uses 50% duty cycle.
not as "flashy" as a quick pulse, but actually easier see at a distance.

the human eye averages for 200 ms so for quick pulses its the
total light energy in the pulse that matters. stobes cant make long pulses
but LEDs can, so long pulses are the right choice with leds.


circuit will be like this

IRF2804
---------
| | |----parallel LEDs----Resistor----+12V
| LM555 |--------|
| | |-----gnd
---------

the 2804 is WAY overkill. it can switch 100s of amps. but its only 3 bucks,
so why not use the best.

i ordered a handful and when i get back form snf i will give the circuit a try.

-Jeff

  #13  
Old April 19th 04, 01:27 PM
anonymous coward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay wrote:

Using the web, I found in part 23 section 23.1391 a list of the
intensity (candels) by angle required. From what it looks like,
someone measured the system that was already being made (a bulb and
filter) and put in in the book. So what this means is that you're
stuck emulating a technology inferior in almost every way using a new
technology. The spec emphasizes what light bulbs do well (high flux,
even illumination) and de-emphasizes what it doesn't (spectral purity,
reliability).

You could probably do the math from the minimum guaranteed intensity
and the beam shapes and meet the spec on paper, but it would be nice
to actually measure it. You can buy equipment to do this if you want
to add to your tool box yet another single purpose tool.

The other issue is that the manufacturer beam shapes are really a
little bogus because the high intensity LEDs use clear lenses and
actually project an image of the semiconductor chip inside. So
instead of a nice round shape, you get a picture of a little bright
chicklet and reflector cup.


This is very true for the LEDs with a very narrow beam (half angles down to
8-degrees or so) - but luxeons give a much broader beam and for whatever
reason this isn't the case in my experience (lambertian beam pattern only).
You can buy an optical widget that fits over the LED to make a narrower
beam again, and IMO your criticism is very valid for this case.

A solution is to shine the LEDs through some five or ten-degree holographic
diffusing filter from the POC (Physical Optics Corporation - if memory
serves). They're nice people to deal with, and were giving out free 1"
samples last time I asked.

AC

So how many LEDs? Depends on if your using "typical" or minumum
guaranteed intensity. Depends on what direction you array them,
depends on what bin they came from, depends on a lot of things.




(Bill) wrote in message
. com...
To Jim Weir and Group

I am interested in using the new (to me) 1 watt and 5 watt LEDs for
nav lights.
Not having to worry about changing bulbs or the power requirements are
very attractive.

I have seen some posts about leds but would like to tie it all
together.
I know of two sites showing their versions and one is using 9 LEDs
while the other is using more.

What it boils down to is this: how many leds for the the right and
left wings, how many for the tail and can the leds be strobed or any
thing else I don't know?

Thanks
Bill


  #14  
Old April 20th 04, 01:13 AM
Dean Head
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jeff,
Who did you order the 2804's from?
Thanks
Dean

"Jeff Peterson" wrote in message
om...
Eric Jones wrote an nice description of leds as nav and strobe lights

he


http://www.periheliondesign.com/down...ing%20LEDs.pdf

the rear and side strobes are fairly easy do with about 5 ea 5 watt

luxeons

i used 6 in my tail strobe.

the required strobe intensity in the forward direction is a bit
tougher to accomplish with LEDs. still possible.

i think for my tail strobe i will uses 50% duty cycle.
not as "flashy" as a quick pulse, but actually easier see at a distance.

the human eye averages for 200 ms so for quick pulses its the
total light energy in the pulse that matters. stobes cant make long pulses
but LEDs can, so long pulses are the right choice with leds.


circuit will be like this

IRF2804
---------
| | |----parallel LEDs----Resistor----+12V
| LM555 |--------|
| | |-----gnd
---------

the 2804 is WAY overkill. it can switch 100s of amps. but its only 3

bucks,
so why not use the best.

i ordered a handful and when i get back form snf i will give the circuit a

try.

-Jeff



  #15  
Old April 20th 04, 08:03 PM
Jay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can get all the parts from Digi-key for less than $10 +S/H except
those fancy LEDs.

Regards


"Dean Head" wrote in message ...
Jeff,
Who did you order the 2804's from?
Thanks
Dean

  #16  
Old April 24th 04, 03:27 AM
Jeff Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dean Head" wrote in message ...
Jeff,
Who did you order the 2804's from?
Thanks
Dean

digikey.

built the circuit today and will post photos and schematic soon

-Jeff
  #17  
Old April 24th 04, 03:06 PM
Dean Head
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jeff,

Anxious to see the results. I am thinking of some pretty slick ways to embed
these into my Cozy winglets. I hope to find a way to replace the Xenon
strobes completely.

Dean

"Jeff Peterson" wrote in message
om...
"Dean Head" wrote in message

...
Jeff,
Who did you order the 2804's from?
Thanks
Dean

digikey.

built the circuit today and will post photos and schematic soon

-Jeff



  #20  
Old April 27th 04, 02:48 PM
BllFs6
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Guys...

Havent followed this thread carefully...been away for awhile...so forgive me if
this has been covered already...

There is one disadvantage to using mostly the forward voltage drop of a LED to
"span" the battery voltage ...as opposed to say a big resistor taking a good
fraction of the voltage drop...

An LED's voltage drop/resistance is pretty temp dependent....

And here is what can happen....the LED gets warm.....resistance drops....more
power flows through....LED gets warmer still...still more power
flows....warmer,more power....can easily become a runaway situation...leading
to burnout or even worse a fire somewhere in the electrical cicuit..

Now, this isnt much of a problem in very low powered LEDS, but in high powered
ones that get warm to touch just sitting on the bench, its something you need
to worry about....

If you have a circuit in mind...you need to make it and THEN run it in absolute
hottest environment at the absolute highest voltage it will ever see (ie the 14
or whatever volts is MAX from the alternator rather than the nominal 12 from
the battery)....then if that works and current limits werent exceeded back the
power flow down say 10 to 20 percent just to be safe....

What the max temp of a "lexan lighting housing" at the tip of a wing in August
on a no wind day sitting on a black asphalt runway at high noon in Texas?

I can easily imagine it being 60 degrees or more than the temp you tested it in
on the bench.....so just because it didnt suffer thermal runaway on the bench
doesnt tell you much about how it"ll behave in the plane....

Another related problem is if you have multiple parallel LED/resistor paths
running from the same voltage source....at room temp you may test the setup and
each path is taking the same power....but then there is that pesky
temp/resistance property of the LEDs...if they are different enough, when your
setup is run in a higher temp or poor cooling conditions....one path may become
a significantly lower resistance path than the other (the resistors can cause
it as well)...and all of a sudden you have way more power flowing through one
path than was intended to....and you have another thermal runaway situation...

Which brings up fuses....lets say you 3 parallel LED resistor paths, running
off of one wire pair that runs out the wing tips....

You design it so each branch takes a bit under 5 amps, so you have that wire
pair fused at 15 amps....

If you suffer something like one dead branch in combo with a thermal runaway of
another branch (or even perhaps just a thermal runaway of one branch)....you
can have a situation where one branch is WAY exceeding its design limits...yet
the total power isnt enough to trip the fuse back in the cockpit...

So, EACH branch should be fused seperately in addition to the main overall wire
fuse...

Now, if youve designed and tested your circuit worth a hoot the chances of one
branch going amook are pretty low, so something like "semi permanent" circuit
board fuses soldered into each branch probably make more sense and would
provide better reliability than removeable fuses...

Another thing....precision resistors, temp stable resistors, and even resistors
with a significant negative temp coefficient ARENT that expensive compared to
other expensense for an airplane/high powered LED project....so the might be
worth investigating, especially since your only talking a handful of them and
they could significantly ease your engineering problems as well as improve the
reliability of the setup...

Just my 10 cents....

take care

Blll
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.