If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:24:54 PM UTC-8, Bill D wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 3:19:21 PM UTC-7, Kimmo Hytoenen wrote: After Argentina some competition pilots were quite disappointed with the new variometers using acceleration to calculate lift. I have not tested myself, just telling their opinion. At 21:49 14 February 2013, John Galloway wrote: If the butterfly -- or clearnav, with future software -- did read out 3 d w= ind 20 times a second, this would be a big advantage. Not only could you de= tect lift long before F =3D MA gets the glider moving upward, you could tel= l upward gusts from forward gusts and sideways gusts. Dynamic soaring might= even become possible, or at least better energy extraction from gusts. Eve= n the 302 has the necessary sensors, my impression is that we're all waitin= g on the software development.=20 John Cochrane Regarding gusts, the Butterfly website (in FAQ) already claims: "A conventional variometer uses changes in air pressure (TE- pressure, static- and total-pressure) to determine energy changes the aircraft experiences. Butterfly Vario does the same. Additionally it uses an inertial sensing platform that allows for real-time determination of airmass-movement and realtime determination of wind. With this technology a pilot can judge the difference between gust induced energy changes and thermal induced energy changes." John Galloway Not sure, but I suspect they are mixing frames of reference. In theory, the way to do this is solve the TE equations in the inertial and air-data domains separately then compare them. A gust will show up strongly in the air-data but less so in the inertial data so a computer - or a pilot - can tell the difference. A purely inertial vario will require a full IMU with GPS updating. These things are probably still too expensive for sailplanes but only just. If we have some EE guys here, SparkFun electronics offers several IMU sensor system under $150: https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/160 |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 4:24:54 PM UTC-8, Bill D wrote:
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 3:19:21 PM UTC-7, Kimmo Hytoenen wrote: After Argentina some competition pilots were quite disappointed with the new variometers using acceleration to calculate lift. I have not tested myself, just telling their opinion. At 21:49 14 February 2013, John Galloway wrote: If the butterfly -- or clearnav, with future software -- did read out 3 d w= ind 20 times a second, this would be a big advantage. Not only could you de= tect lift long before F =3D MA gets the glider moving upward, you could tel= l upward gusts from forward gusts and sideways gusts. Dynamic soaring might= even become possible, or at least better energy extraction from gusts. Eve= n the 302 has the necessary sensors, my impression is that we're all waitin= g on the software development.=20 John Cochrane Regarding gusts, the Butterfly website (in FAQ) already claims: "A conventional variometer uses changes in air pressure (TE- pressure, static- and total-pressure) to determine energy changes the aircraft experiences. Butterfly Vario does the same. Additionally it uses an inertial sensing platform that allows for real-time determination of airmass-movement and realtime determination of wind. With this technology a pilot can judge the difference between gust induced energy changes and thermal induced energy changes." John Galloway Not sure, but I suspect they are mixing frames of reference. In theory, the way to do this is solve the TE equations in the inertial and air-data domains separately then compare them. A gust will show up strongly in the air-data but less so in the inertial data so a computer - or a pilot - can tell the difference. A purely inertial vario will require a full IMU with GPS updating. These things are probably still too expensive for sailplanes but only just. Sparkfun has several IMU systems under $150: https://www.sparkfun.com/categories/160 |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Best performing Vario?
To me the best vario would have audio the pilot can really relate to. This allows adjustments to thermal turns to be consciously made by the idiot behind the stick, while looking at the display usually marketed by Mecaplex.
Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 57mm Cambridge Vario/FS: 80mm Cambridge Vario | ufmechanic | Soaring | 0 | March 24th 09 05:31 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Aviation Photos | 3 | January 20th 08 03:10 PM |
Martin Mars, Performing Live In Downtown Vancouver! | Zomby Woof | Naval Aviation | 2 | January 11th 08 06:10 PM |
Navy Performing Well, Keeps Eye on Future Force | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 14th 05 10:06 PM |
AN-2 performing a loop | Maro_SK | Aerobatics | 1 | March 25th 04 08:18 PM |