A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VOR technigue, don't overshoot



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old December 11th 08, 08:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Viperdoc[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Anthony, at least it looks like he has a plane and flies- what about you?



  #52  
Old December 11th 08, 08:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Viperdoc[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot


Anthony said:
Prove it. Answer your own questions, for a start. It's always useful to
share knowledge.



Anthony, why do you keep posting, when you should realize by now that every
time you make a single post, you will never receive an answer or a positive
response to what you've written?

This is because you lack credibility and experience, and are therefore
disrepected. This will never change unless the unlikely event occurs when
you actually fly an airplane and gain experience.

Until then, you will always be treated as the pompous wannabe you are.



  #53  
Old December 11th 08, 10:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Beauciphus writes:

Trying to become an internet tough-guy?


No, just calling someone's bluff.
  #54  
Old December 11th 08, 10:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Viperdoc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot




No, just calling someone's bluff.


Anthony, how would you know whether he was bluffing or not? Just a few
months ago you were askiing the location of the ejection seat switch on a
Baron! (We all know it's like an Aces II, just pull the yellow and black
ring between your legs).

Of course, it's not visible on MSFS, so this is why you probably missed it.


  #55  
Old December 12th 08, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Beauciphus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Beauciphus writes:

Trying to become an internet tough-guy?


No, just calling someone's bluff.


It really doesn't matter if he know or not. You are not worthy of an answer.


  #56  
Old December 12th 08, 06:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Viperdoc writes:

... how would you know whether he was bluffing or not?


Someone who is bluffing will never answer the question, despite the obvious
advantages of doing so.
  #57  
Old December 12th 08, 11:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Beauciphus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Viperdoc writes:

... how would you know whether he was bluffing or not?


Someone who is bluffing will never answer the question, despite the
obvious
advantages of doing so.


I see no advantage. I have no interest in the answer, and most real pilots
wouldn't. It's simply trivia.


  #58  
Old December 12th 08, 02:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Viperdoc[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Someone who is bluffing will never answer the question, despite the
obvious
advantages of doing so


There is no advantage in doing so, since any pilot would obviously know the
answer.

The premise of your logic is flawed, and based upon the fact that you do not
understand anything near to what you think about flying, since you have no
experience.

You are not worth the time or effort to formulate a considered or respectful
answer, and this is why you will always be castigated on this and other NGs.


  #59  
Old December 12th 08, 02:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Beauciphus writes:

I see no advantage. I have no interest in the answer, and most real pilots
wouldn't. It's simply trivia.


It apparently wasn't trivia when I was asked. When did its status change?
  #60  
Old December 12th 08, 06:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default VOR technigue, don't overshoot

Viperdoc writes:

There is no advantage in doing so, since any pilot would obviously know the
answer.


Then there is no point in asking me the same questions, is there? And it's a
bit contradictory to refuse to answer a question and then criticize someone
else for not answering it, isn't it?

You are not worth the time or effort to formulate a considered or respectful
answer, and this is why you will always be castigated on this and other NGs.


You post to me regularly even though I usually don't even respond, so
obviously it's worth a great deal to you. You do realize how transparent this
is, don't you?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Overshoot in Honduras? Mike Isaksen Piloting 12 June 2nd 08 01:53 PM
Hawk overshoot [1/1] Peter Twydell Aviation Photos 0 March 25th 08 07:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.