If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
From: Mark and Kim Smith
Date: 9/8/2004 3:14 AM Central Daylight Time Message-id: ArtKramr wrote: Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: "Jack G" Date: 9/7/2004 7:54 PM Pacific Art, Being a bombadeer / navigator is not like piloting anything. Admit it Art, you were a just a crew member on an airplane flown by a real pilot. Do you know why they have pilots on bombers? Just for one reason which was to put a bombardier over a target for 30 seconds. Do you know why they have gunners on a bomber? Just one reason. To protect that bombardier and get him over the target for 30 seconds. Do you know why they have fighter cover? Just to get a bombardier over a target for 30 seconds. The pilot is only a bus driver to deliver him where he can hurt the enemy. So don't make too big a deal of pilots . Some are good and some are not..If you get one who can fly a good bomb run, not dump your gyro and keep the wings level so you don't dump bombs all over the landscape, you are lucky.But good bomb run pilots are not all that easy to find. And as far as judging pilots performance on a bomb run, no one is more qualified to make that judgement than a bombardier. But this is a subject you would know nothing about. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer Wow! Tell that to Paul Shorts face! Get rid of all the useless people and how does the bombardier get to the target?? Haven't you heard? There was no one else in the entire ETO. Art won that air war all by himself. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
|
#214
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Steven P. McNicoll" Date: 9/8/2004 5:30 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: .net "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Never was in pilot traning. I didn't say you were. I said it sounds like you're bitter over washing out of pilot training and being made a bombardier. Not everyone was qualified to be a pilot. I'd say you are a living example of someone not qualified to be anything military. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: (B2431) Date: 9/8/2004 8:15 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: No I wasn't there, but you yourself have said that would be the case. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired That says it all. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 9/8/2004 5:22 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: (BUFDRVR) Date: 9/7/2004 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: ArtKramr wrote: A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you have done harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed airliner. Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is something else. Ahh, now we have a new Kramer version of combat. Now, to qualify, you must have delivered explosive ordnance. C-47s flying over "the Hump" and intercepted by Japanese Zeros...not "real combat". C-130s landing in Khe Sahn during artilliary and mortor fire...not combat. UH-60s inserting SF forces behind Iraqi lines before the beginning of Iraqi Freedom...not combat. Hell, Ed Rasimus in an F-4E on MiGCAP over Hanoi...not combat. The list gets shorter and shorter.... BUFDRVR Don't try to mix Ed with the wannabbes on this NG. Ed fought the good fight. But why are you still on that eternal bomb run that never ends? You have been on that bomb run for years and never reached the target. No, Bufdrvr has hit a few targets, and no doubt he demonstrated better accuracy than you could ever have acheived (despite your whining protestations that you *never* missed a target...yeah, right...). And you curiously missed responding to his other examples of what you have termed "non-combat" flying...I guess my brother was not in combat when he got shot down during a Dustoff mission in Vietnam? So you are again lying...which seems to be about all you are capable of doing anymore. Sad. Brooks Arthur Kramer And your combat experience was what oh pathetic one? Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 9/8/2004 5:24 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: Ian MacLure Date: 9/7/2004 9:36 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: (ArtKramr) wrote in : Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: (B2431) Date: 9/7/2004 1:52 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: I'll bet he saw more combat than you did and he flew C-54s. A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you have done harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed So being fired on multiple times doesn't count. Taxiing in wearing substantial portions of your deceased copilot and good friend doesn't count. Having a second copilot killed during landing doesn't count. Flying onto disputed airfields doesn't count? Losing 20 ft of fuselage to an artillery round and flying whats left of the airplane to Guam doesn't count? So I guess whatever it was he was delivering under fire could not have been that important. Well, I'm glad you cleared that up. I have a friend who was a C-47 driver on D-Day, dropped paras. I guess what he did doesn't count. A gentleman I sat next to in our town band went ashore with the first wave on D-Day but he was only a doctor so I guess he doesn't count. airliner. Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is something else. Does the word tactical transport mean anything to you? Do you know what day it is even? IBM There is the tip of the spear. Then there is everything else. The very best are at the tip of the spear. Where were you? Then you must not have been at the "tip of the spear", being as you have repeatedly proven to be anything but "the very best" (how can a pilot washout call himself the "very best"?). Brooks Arthur Kramer You weren't even good enough to make it to combat at all. How pathetic you are little boy hiding under a desk while a war raged and men fought. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... I'd say you are a living example of someone not qualified to be anything military. You'd be wrong about that too. |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
"ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 9/8/2004 5:22 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard? From: (BUFDRVR) Date: 9/7/2004 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: ArtKramr wrote: A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you have done harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed airliner. Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is something else. Ahh, now we have a new Kramer version of combat. Now, to qualify, you must have delivered explosive ordnance. C-47s flying over "the Hump" and intercepted by Japanese Zeros...not "real combat". C-130s landing in Khe Sahn during artilliary and mortor fire...not combat. UH-60s inserting SF forces behind Iraqi lines before the beginning of Iraqi Freedom...not combat. Hell, Ed Rasimus in an F-4E on MiGCAP over Hanoi...not combat. The list gets shorter and shorter.... BUFDRVR Don't try to mix Ed with the wannabbes on this NG. Ed fought the good fight. But why are you still on that eternal bomb run that never ends? You have been on that bomb run for years and never reached the target. No, Bufdrvr has hit a few targets, and no doubt he demonstrated better accuracy than you could ever have acheived (despite your whining protestations that you *never* missed a target...yeah, right...). And you curiously missed responding to his other examples of what you have termed "non-combat" flying...I guess my brother was not in combat when he got shot down during a Dustoff mission in Vietnam? So you are again lying...which seems to be about all you are capable of doing anymore. Sad. Brooks Arthur Kramer And your combat experience was what oh pathetic one? Combat experience is not required in order to properly define you as a pathological liar. And are your veterans' benefits any different from mine--no? Figures. Brooks Arthur Kramer |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
ArtKramr wrote:
There is the tip of the spear. Then there is everything else. The very best are at the tip of the spear. C-47s delivered paratroopers the night before D-Day. The only other aircraft airborne were allied fighters. Sounds like "tip of the spear" to me. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
George W. Bush Abortion Scandal that should have been | Psalm 110 | Military Aviation | 0 | August 12th 04 09:40 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |