A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why did Bush join the national guard?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #212  
Old September 8th 04, 04:29 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: Mark and Kim Smith
Date: 9/8/2004 3:14 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

ArtKramr wrote:

Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Jack G"

Date: 9/7/2004 7:54 PM Pacific





Art,

Being a bombadeer / navigator is not like piloting anything.

Admit it Art, you were a just a crew member on an airplane flown by a real
pilot.



Do you know why they have pilots on bombers? Just for one reason which was

to
put a bombardier over a target for 30 seconds. Do you know why they have
gunners on a bomber? Just one reason. To protect that bombardier and get him
over the target for 30 seconds. Do you know why they have fighter cover?

Just
to get a bombardier over a target for 30 seconds. The pilot is only a bus
driver to deliver him where he can hurt the enemy. So don't make too big a
deal of pilots . Some are good and some are not..If you get one who can fly

a
good bomb run, not dump your gyro and keep the wings level so you don't

dump
bombs all over the landscape, you are lucky.But good bomb run pilots are not
all that easy to find. And as far as judging pilots performance on a bomb

run,
no one is more qualified to make that judgement than a bombardier. But this

is
a subject you would know nothing about.






Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Wow! Tell that to Paul Shorts face!

Get rid of all the useless people and how does the bombardier get to the
target??


Haven't you heard? There was no one else in the entire ETO. Art won that air
war all by himself.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #216  
Old September 8th 04, 07:41 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Kevin Brooks"
Date: 9/8/2004 5:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From:
(BUFDRVR)
Date: 9/7/2004 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

ArtKramr wrote:

A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you have

done
harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed

airliner.
Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is something

else.

Ahh, now we have a new Kramer version of combat. Now, to qualify, you

must
have
delivered explosive ordnance. C-47s flying over "the Hump" and

intercepted by
Japanese Zeros...not "real combat". C-130s landing in Khe Sahn during
artilliary and mortor fire...not combat. UH-60s inserting SF forces

behind
Iraqi lines before the beginning of Iraqi Freedom...not combat. Hell, Ed
Rasimus in an F-4E on MiGCAP over Hanoi...not combat. The list gets

shorter
and
shorter....


BUFDRVR



Don't try to mix Ed with the wannabbes on this NG. Ed fought the good

fight.
But why are you still on that eternal bomb run that never ends? You have

been
on that bomb run for years and never reached the target.


No, Bufdrvr has hit a few targets, and no doubt he demonstrated better
accuracy than you could ever have acheived (despite your whining
protestations that you *never* missed a target...yeah, right...). And you
curiously missed responding to his other examples of what you have termed
"non-combat" flying...I guess my brother was not in combat when he got shot
down during a Dustoff mission in Vietnam? So you are again lying...which
seems to be about all you are capable of doing anymore. Sad.

Brooks



Arthur Kramer



And your combat experience was what oh pathetic one?


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #217  
Old September 8th 04, 07:43 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Kevin Brooks"
Date: 9/8/2004 5:24 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: Ian MacLure

Date: 9/7/2004 9:36 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

(ArtKramr) wrote in
:

Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From:
(B2431)
Date: 9/7/2004 1:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

I'll bet he saw more combat than you did and he flew C-54s.


A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you have
done harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed

So being fired on multiple times doesn't count.
Taxiing in wearing substantial portions of your
deceased copilot and good friend doesn't count.
Having a second copilot killed during landing doesn't count.
Flying onto disputed airfields doesn't count?
Losing 20 ft of fuselage to an artillery round and flying whats
left of the airplane to Guam doesn't count?
So I guess whatever it was he was delivering under fire could not
have been that important.
Well, I'm glad you cleared that up.

I have a friend who was a C-47 driver on D-Day, dropped paras.
I guess what he did doesn't count.

A gentleman I sat next to in our town band went ashore with the
first wave on D-Day but he was only a doctor so I guess he doesn't
count.

airliner. Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is
something else.

Does the word tactical transport mean anything to you?
Do you know what day it is even?

IBM



There is the tip of the spear. Then there is everything else. The very

best are
at the tip of the spear. Where were you?


Then you must not have been at the "tip of the spear", being as you have
repeatedly proven to be anything but "the very best" (how can a pilot
washout call himself the "very best"?).

Brooks



Arthur Kramer




You weren't even good enough to make it to combat at all. How pathetic you are
little boy hiding under a desk while a war raged and men fought.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #218  
Old September 8th 04, 07:47 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...

I'd say you are a living example of someone not qualified to be anything
military.


You'd be wrong about that too.


  #219  
Old September 8th 04, 08:01 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From: "Kevin Brooks"
Date: 9/8/2004 5:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Why did Bush join the national guard?
From:
(BUFDRVR)
Date: 9/7/2004 8:18 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

ArtKramr wrote:

A C-54 is not a combat aircraft. Seeing "action" implies that you

have
done
harm to the enemy. You can't do harm to the enemy in an unarmed

airliner.
Flying combat airccraft is one thing, Flying airliners is something

else.

Ahh, now we have a new Kramer version of combat. Now, to qualify, you

must
have
delivered explosive ordnance. C-47s flying over "the Hump" and

intercepted by
Japanese Zeros...not "real combat". C-130s landing in Khe Sahn during
artilliary and mortor fire...not combat. UH-60s inserting SF forces

behind
Iraqi lines before the beginning of Iraqi Freedom...not combat. Hell,

Ed
Rasimus in an F-4E on MiGCAP over Hanoi...not combat. The list gets

shorter
and
shorter....


BUFDRVR



Don't try to mix Ed with the wannabbes on this NG. Ed fought the good

fight.
But why are you still on that eternal bomb run that never ends? You

have
been
on that bomb run for years and never reached the target.


No, Bufdrvr has hit a few targets, and no doubt he demonstrated better
accuracy than you could ever have acheived (despite your whining
protestations that you *never* missed a target...yeah, right...). And you
curiously missed responding to his other examples of what you have termed
"non-combat" flying...I guess my brother was not in combat when he got

shot
down during a Dustoff mission in Vietnam? So you are again lying...which
seems to be about all you are capable of doing anymore. Sad.

Brooks



Arthur Kramer



And your combat experience was what oh pathetic one?


Combat experience is not required in order to properly define you as a
pathological liar. And are your veterans' benefits any different from
mine--no? Figures.

Brooks



Arthur Kramer



  #220  
Old September 8th 04, 08:14 PM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ArtKramr wrote:

There is the tip of the spear. Then there is everything else. The very best
are
at the tip of the spear.


C-47s delivered paratroopers the night before D-Day. The only other aircraft
airborne were allied fighters. Sounds like "tip of the spear" to me.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
George W. Bush Abortion Scandal that should have been Psalm 110 Military Aviation 0 August 12th 04 09:40 AM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.