A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Would the convair XC-99 make a profitable airliner?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 10th 04, 03:05 PM
Prowlus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Would the convair XC-99 make a profitable airliner?

Looking at a recent article of the convair xc-99 pusher transport I'm
suprised convair didn't consider turning it into a civil airlinner
during development . With the ability to carry 400 passengers,
wouldn't this plane have ushured in the concept of mass-air travel
decades before the 747 if it had been built?
  #2  
Old September 10th 04, 03:37 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Prowlus" wrote in message
m...
Looking at a recent article of the convair xc-99 pusher transport I'm
suprised convair didn't consider turning it into a civil airlinner
during development . With the ability to carry 400 passengers,
wouldn't this plane have ushured in the concept of mass-air travel
decades before the 747 if it had been built?


Way too big for its era--it would have found relatively few civil airports
that could have supported its use at that time. Way too slow--the emphasis
was quickly shifting to speed, not tremendous passenger capacity, at the
time of the XC-99 development. Not to mention it would likely have been
rather uncomfortable for the passengers (internal noise for the B-36 was
pretty high, IIRC, due to those six massive recip engines). So in summation,
you'd have had an aircraft that could only be operated from a handful of
airports at the time, would have subjected its passengers to significant
discomfort, and would have kept them in that condition for a longer period
of flight than competing aircraft--not a good business proposition, IMO.

Brooks


  #3  
Old September 10th 04, 03:44 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Prowlus" wrote in message
m...
Looking at a recent article of the convair xc-99 pusher transport I'm
suprised convair didn't consider turning it into a civil airlinner
during development . With the ability to carry 400 passengers,
wouldn't this plane have ushured in the concept of mass-air travel
decades before the 747 if it had been built?



Convair actually proposed an airliner version (Type 37).

It was rated to carry 204 pax rather than 400, the military
packed em in rather tight. The civil version would have
been a turboprop.

http://www.air-and-space.com/xc99.htm

Keith





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #4  
Old September 10th 04, 04:28 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Prowlus) writes:
Looking at a recent article of the convair xc-99 pusher transport I'm
suprised convair didn't consider turning it into a civil airlinner
during development . With the ability to carry 400 passengers,
wouldn't this plane have ushured in the concept of mass-air travel
decades before the 747 if it had been built?


They did. Pan Am ordered 15 Convair Model 37s, the commercial flavor
of the C-99, in February, 1945. The expected payload was about 200
passengers adn 15,000# of baggage & mail. Things didn't work out
quite the way they expected though - After the war ended, there
weren't enough people travelling to fill a 200-seat airplane, and the
U.S. government made surplaus C-54s (DC-4s) available for bargain
prices.

Given the history of the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser, (The airliner
version of the B-29/B-50/C-97), I wonder if the Model 37 could have
been flown at a profit even if there were a travel boom. The Strats
were more complex than the DC-4 and Constellations they were competing
with, and the 28 cylinder R4360s they were powered by - the same basic
engine used in the C-99 - was pretty troublesome in commercial
service. The B.377 wasn't commercially viable, even though its
performance was substantially higher than the DC-4 or early Connie.

IIRC, at some point, Douglas proposed a passenger version of the C-74
(The single-story predecessor to the C-124) to fill the same niche (It
was, I believe, designated DC-7 for a short time, before the DC-7
designation was used for the stretched DC-6), with the same results.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.