If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Withstanding Peak Temperatures
OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak
temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on AVWEB, and still have this question). -Sami (N2057M, Piper Turbo Arrow III) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on AVWEB, and still have this question). As you yourself just said, the engine can "stand" it. It's all about wear and tear. Why abuse the machine? Do you drive your car at redline on the tach? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? There is nothing wrong with running an engine at peak EGT if it is happy to run there. That's where I run mine, in accordance with my POH. In the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on AVWEB, and still have this question). When you read Deakin's articles, you are not too subtly encouraged to take away the belief that running 50-100 ROP is actually worse for the engine than running either much richer or much cooler. He provides graphs and text to explain why. The incorrect assumption explicit in your question suggests that you have misunderstood something fairly fundamental about what you read. You should go back and look at the graphs of EGT, CHT, HP, and peak pressure, plotted against fuel mixture. Convince yourself of where CHT and peak pressure are at a maximum, and see where that lines up against EGT. It should be around 50-100 ROP. Note how as EGT continues to increase, CHT and peak pressure (the real enemies) actually decrease. Also look at your aircraft panel. Note that CHT has a redline. Note that EGT (most probably) has no redline. Your engine is designed to tolerate maximum EGT. It is not designed to tolerate arbitrarily high CHT. You manage EGT to control CHT. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Because that additional 100 degrees of exhaust temperature translates back
to far more than an additional 100 degrees in combustion flame temperature, and requires the heads, and the oil, and especially the exhaust valves, to remove a larger total heat load than the additional 100 degrees on your egt gauge looks like to you... Engineering is not always intuitive... denny "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on AVWEB, and still have this question). -Sami (N2057M, Piper Turbo Arrow III) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in
: OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly lower in temperature than the peak temperature. There is nothing inherently wrong with running an engine at peak, or ROP, or LOP. The issue is running the engine within the engineering design constraints -- i.e. where it is not subjected to debilitating conditions. There are two temperatures to consider - the cylinder head temp, and the exhaust gas temp, as well as cylinder pressure. If all three are well within limits, then you are not hurting the engine. If they are getting near (or beyond) limits... not good. Add in the fact that most manufacturers tend to want to stretch the limits on temps in the POH, and add in instrumentation error (especially with EGT), and a little margin is a good thing. In your turbo Arrow III (nice plane, fly one myself) you can run ROP, or LOP (if it will run smoothly), or you can run at peak (see the POH - this is recommended for best economy). But regardless, you must keep the temperatures within limits. Running well rich (100 degrees or more) is one way to help do this - it sure brings down the EGT and CHT. But it also burns a LOT of excess gas, fouls the plugs, etc. Leaning it out helps keep the engine clean, and cuts WAY down on gas (same airspeed LOP in mine, vs similar temps and airspeed ROP is almost 4 gph difference). One thing to be careful of on that engine -- at LOW power settings (25" or so), the EGT's can get quite high due to the fixed mag timing. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
O. Sami Saydjari wrote:
: OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak : temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In : the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where : many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly : lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the : engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand : peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on : AVWEB, and still have this question). Sami, I think that Deakin is using TEMPERATURE, which can be determined by cockpit instrumentation to describe TIME, which cannot be seen on cockpit instruments. When running 50-100 ROP, the temperatures are well controlled. The difficulty as I understand it is because the power pulse from the piston occurs very shortly after the piston reached Top Dead Center (TDC). What this means is that the force of the piston is being transferred to the crankshaft at a very small angle - this can be demonstrated by holding your arm out, elbow straight, and pushing on the wall: you can't make your elbow bend. If you bend your elbow a little bit, and then push the wall, it is quite easy to bend your elbow more. (In my example, your elbow represents the connecting rod/crankshaft, and your hand the piston). Running at LOP values, or very rich values, slows down the buring of the gases above the piston, resulting in the push force being delivered when the crankshaft has turned a couple more degrees (Deakin claims that 16 degrees after TDC is optimum). This is easier for the engine to take, the bearings are exposed to lower forces, etc. The use of TEMPERATURE to determine TIME (crankshaft angle) is because there is no instrument to determine crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. Please note that this is a significant difference from auto engines! Car engines have adjustable spark timing to overcome these difficulties, while airplane magneto engines almost always have fixed timing (there is an adjustable timing system for airplane engines). I am not sure that I explained this as well as it is possible to do so, but the basic point that I am trying to make is that the TEMPERATURE is not in itself the critical issue, so long as you don't melt the cylinder heads. Rather, TEMPERATURE is used to indirectly indicate another, immesurable, parameter, crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. -- Aaron Coolidge (N9376J) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Aaron Coolidge" wrote in message ... O. Sami Saydjari wrote: : OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak : temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In : the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where : many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly : lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the : engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand : peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on : AVWEB, and still have this question). Sami, I think that Deakin is using TEMPERATURE, which can be determined by cockpit instrumentation to describe TIME, which cannot be seen on cockpit instruments. When running 50-100 ROP, the temperatures are well controlled. The difficulty as I understand it is because the power pulse from the piston occurs very shortly after the piston reached Top Dead Center (TDC). What this means is that the force of the piston is being transferred to the crankshaft at a very small angle - this can be demonstrated by holding your arm out, elbow straight, and pushing on the wall: you can't make your elbow bend. If you bend your elbow a little bit, and then push the wall, it is quite easy to bend your elbow more. (In my example, your elbow represents the connecting rod/crankshaft, and your hand the piston). Running at LOP values, or very rich values, slows down the buring of the gases above the piston, resulting in the push force being delivered when the crankshaft has turned a couple more degrees (Deakin claims that 16 degrees after TDC is optimum). This is easier for the engine to take, the bearings are exposed to lower forces, etc. The use of TEMPERATURE to determine TIME (crankshaft angle) is because there is no instrument to determine crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. Please note that this is a significant difference from auto engines! Car engines have adjustable spark timing to overcome these difficulties, while airplane magneto engines almost always have fixed timing (there is an adjustable timing system for airplane engines). I am not sure that I explained this as well as it is possible to do so, but the basic point that I am trying to make is that the TEMPERATURE is not in itself the critical issue, so long as you don't melt the cylinder heads. Rather, TEMPERATURE is used to indirectly indicate another, immesurable, parameter, crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. -- http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182084-1.html (Review the charts and graphs) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"James M. Knox" wrote in message
... There are two temperatures to consider - the cylinder head temp, and the exhaust gas temp, as well as cylinder pressure. If all three are well within limits, then you are not hurting the engine. If they are getting near (or beyond) limits... not good. Is there a limit on EGT? I've never seen an explicit one, but I've only operated normally aspirated engines. Are there TIT limits? Julian Scarfe |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:32:34 -0000, "Julian Scarfe"
wrote: Is there a limit on EGT? I've never seen an explicit one, but I've only operated normally aspirated engines. Are there TIT limits? There are TIT limits -- IIRC around 1650°F I don't know what the limit is on the Lycoming valves. In my TN Lyc IO360, I've never seen the TIT above about 1500°F. But in fully turbocharged engines, the TIT limit can be exceeded. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Rosenfeld wrote in
: Is there a limit on EGT? I've never seen an explicit one, but I've only operated normally aspirated engines. Are there TIT limits? There are TIT limits -- IIRC around 1650°F I don't know what the limit is on the Lycoming valves. In my TN Lyc IO360, I've never seen the TIT above about 1500°F. But in fully turbocharged engines, the TIT limit can be exceeded. There are limits, depending upon the material used to construct the exhaust system. It's usually in the 1550 F to 1650 F range. [I want to say that the Iconel system is TCM and good for 1650, but please don't take my word for it.] The problem is that EGT probes are VERY subject to error, and it is hard to truly measure the temperatures accurately. The probes themselves are very accurate, but the tiniest changes in placement, or even positioning, can make a significant difference in reading. That's why we tend not to look TOO CLOSELY at absolute EGT readings, and to want some "margin" between what is allowed and what is read. For instance, my TSIO-360-FB allows temps up to 1650. I try to keep them below 1550 in cruise, however, and only VERY seldom let them go anywhere near 1600 even in hot/heavy climb. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|