If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
Only partially correct. The Velocity initially called in that he was landing on 33 but changed to 15 when all other traffic reported that they were using 15. The wind was calm. He made a straight-in behind RV Flight and caused Red Flight (SX-300s) to alter their pattern. Keith was lead in Red Flight and saw it all. BTW -- I apologise for the multiple posts, as I am having trouble with Newswatcher. Thank you very much for taking the time to share this, and I apologize for passing along information that turned out to be less than factual. So this was not a head-to-head on the same runway, leading to a departure from the runway, as has been alleged? Dave |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news Thank you Orval, condolences to all... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
In article ,
"Blueskies" wrote: "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news Thank you Orval, condolences to all... Thank you. Flags at Spruce Creek are flying at half-staff. Phil's services are Friday, in New Smyrna Beach; I don't have info on Bill's services. It was like standing on a street corner and being hit by a runaway car. I don't think that either one saw it coming, as their flight was taxiing in from their right, so they were probably watching them. One of the other RV'ers was on the ground, watching. He said that the Velocity rammed the RV-8 on the left side, in the cockpit area and moved it about 50 feet. The RV-8 sat there for a moment, engine running, then burst into flames. Neither occupant moved. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article , Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? I don't fly as much as I would like, but I've had my license since 1978. I'll grant you a few of the FARs could be considered "control", but not in the sense that most use the word. Direction of turns, ROW, etc., constitute a very, very weak form of control, but with nobody there to monitor it really is voluntary. I don't consider the other items you mention to be forms of control at all. Matt |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
In article ,
Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? I don't fly as much as I would like, but I've had my license since 1978. I'll grant you a few of the FARs could be considered "control", but not in the sense that most use the word. Direction of turns, ROW, etc., constitute a very, very weak form of control, but with nobody there to monitor it really is voluntary. I don't consider the other items you mention to be forms of control at all. Matt Why do you think that we need that much "control" in the first place? Know the difference between pilots and Air Traffic Controllers? 1. If a pilot screws up, the pilot can die. 2. If an Air Traffic Controller screws up, a pilot can die. We don't NEED a tower at most GA airports -- most of those are there for training purposes for controllers. In fact, a "controller" "controls" nothing -- (s)he is, in reality, a coordinator. If the Swiss pilot of the Velocity had made an overhead approach instead of straight-in, he would have been behind my flight and I might have been sitting at the end of that airport when he dropped in. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article , Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? I don't fly as much as I would like, but I've had my license since 1978. I'll grant you a few of the FARs could be considered "control", but not in the sense that most use the word. Direction of turns, ROW, etc., constitute a very, very weak form of control, but with nobody there to monitor it really is voluntary. I don't consider the other items you mention to be forms of control at all. Matt Why do you think that we need that much "control" in the first place? Why do you think that I think we do need control? I never said or even implied that? Know the difference between pilots and Air Traffic Controllers? Quite well. 1. If a pilot screws up, the pilot can die. 2. If an Air Traffic Controller screws up, a pilot can die. You are just a fount of wisdom. I never heard those lines before! We don't NEED a tower at most GA airports -- most of those are there for training purposes for controllers. In fact, a "controller" "controls" nothing -- (s)he is, in reality, a coordinator. I never said we did. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
On Mar 6, 12:15*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote: In article , *Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , *Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? I don't fly as much as I would like, but I've had my license since 1978. * *I'll grant you a few of the FARs could be considered "control", but not in the sense that most use the word. *Direction of turns, ROW, etc.., constitute a very, very weak form of control, but with nobody there to monitor it really is voluntary. *I don't consider the other items you mention to be forms of control at all. Matt Why do you think that we need that much "control" in the first place? Know the difference between pilots and Air Traffic Controllers? 1. If a pilot screws up, the pilot can die. 2. If an Air Traffic Controller screws up, a pilot can die. We don't NEED a tower at most GA airports -- most of those are there for training purposes for controllers. In fact, a "controller" "controls" nothing -- (s)he is, in reality, a coordinator. If the Swiss pilot of the Velocity had made an overhead approach * instead of straight-in, he would have been behind my flight and I might have been sitting at the end of that airport when he dropped in. -- Remove _'s *from email address to talk to me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Orval Fairbairn wrote: Only partially correct. The Velocity initially called in that he was landing on 33 but changed to 15 when all other traffic reported that they were using 15. The wind was calm. He made a straight-in behind RV Flight and caused Red Flight (SX-300s) to alter their pattern. Keith was lead in Red Flight and saw it all. Ok Now I am confused again, :)... The velocity departed from Sebastian Fla, which is south of the field where the crash happened. He would have been making a straight in on 33. If he did change his plan and land on 15 he would have had to enter a left or right downwind. turn base and then final... Is it because your squadran of Rv's might have got him a little rattled? Did your group make a low pass before they landed? I am guessing they probably do every time they come down for pancakes. I am not trying to start a fuss but it does seem strange you did make the point to say his straight in caused Keith and Red Flight to alter their pattern. It sounds on face value like this was your sandbox and the Velocity was an intruder... Jus curious ya know.. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Experimentals down in Fla
In article
, stol wrote: On Mar 6, 12:15*pm, Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , *Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , *Matt Whiting wrote: Orval Fairbairn wrote: He explained that there is no such thing as an ³uncontrolled airport,² that there are towered and untowered airports, but both have some type of control. He also explaind that a tower would not have prevented the accident. It sounds like an impressive briefing, but I am curious as to what "control" is available at non-towererd airports? Matt FARs, pilot responsibility, Good Operating practices, Mk I eyeballs, CTAF. I take it that you do not fly? I don't fly as much as I would like, but I've had my license since 1978. * *I'll grant you a few of the FARs could be considered "control", but not in the sense that most use the word. *Direction of turns, ROW, etc., constitute a very, very weak form of control, but with nobody there to monitor it really is voluntary. *I don't consider the other items you mention to be forms of control at all. Matt Why do you think that we need that much "control" in the first place? Know the difference between pilots and Air Traffic Controllers? 1. If a pilot screws up, the pilot can die. 2. If an Air Traffic Controller screws up, a pilot can die. We don't NEED a tower at most GA airports -- most of those are there for training purposes for controllers. In fact, a "controller" "controls" nothing -- (s)he is, in reality, a coordinator. If the Swiss pilot of the Velocity had made an overhead approach * instead of straight-in, he would have been behind my flight and I might have been sitting at the end of that airport when he dropped in. -- Remove _'s *from email address to talk to me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Orval Fairbairn wrote: Only partially correct. The Velocity initially called in that he was landing on 33 but changed to 15 when all other traffic reported that they were using 15. The wind was calm. He made a straight-in behind RV Flight and caused Red Flight (SX-300s) to alter their pattern. Keith was lead in Red Flight and saw it all. Ok Now I am confused again, :)... The velocity departed from Sebastian Fla, which is south of the field where the crash happened. He would have been making a straight in on 33. If he did change his plan and land on 15 he would have had to enter a left or right downwind. turn base and then final... Is it because your squadran of Rv's might have got him a little rattled? Did your group make a low pass before they landed? I am guessing they probably do every time they come down for pancakes. I am not trying to start a fuss but it does seem strange you did make the point to say his straight in caused Keith and Red Flight to alter their pattern. It sounds on face value like this was your sandbox and the Velocity was an intruder... Jus curious ya know.. "Our sandbox?" No, but we do frequent their pancake breakfast with 20-30 airplanes, which does strain parking. We do not treat others as "intruders." We also try to give others room in the pattern, so I really do not know about the "rattle factor." According to other reports, the Velocity pilot was a Swiss national, living near Sebastian and was supposedly an experienced pilot. The Velocity initially called in from the south, wanting to make a straight-in for 33; however, everybody else was using 15, so he was so informed. The RVs did overfly, some with smoke. I am not sure whether or not they made more than one pass per flight. They broke left from the overhead to downwind and landed. The Velocity apparently circled wide and entered a straight-in for 15. He did NOT enter a standard downwind pattern, otherwise the flights would have adjusted their break to accommodate him. That is what Keith did when he followed the Velocity. I do not know why the Velocity pilot added full power once he left the runway. Had he not done so, he might have ended up with a bent bird, but that is about all, as the grass and rough terrain would have stopped him pretty quickly. According to Keith, he was kicking up a lot of grass and debris after he left the runway. It is even possible that his prop impacted the ground and started to come apart. -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audio panel for experimentals | [email protected] | Home Built | 1 | January 13th 08 11:45 PM |
Can all US Experimentals fly IFR? | C J Campbell[_1_] | Home Built | 5 | July 14th 07 01:12 PM |
Experimentals and flight training | Chris Wells | Home Built | 30 | October 22nd 05 08:59 PM |
Flying Gators annual Fly-in for experimentals and ultralights | Gilan | Home Built | 8 | November 21st 03 02:09 PM |
lycoming turbo normalizers (for experimentals) | ivo welch | Home Built | 1 | July 21st 03 05:10 PM |