If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Round vs Square E-Chute
Yes, Mark, the experienced pilot should have no trouble at all flying a
rectangular parachute. On my first and second jumps, the jump master on the ground rigged a radio receiver to my chest strap, common for all new students.Â* I had difficulty making out the commands and just did the maneuvers briefed before the jumps.Â* My wife, at the drop zone, told me that the jump master said something like, "He's not paying attention to the radio, but he's doing the maneuvers, so we'll just eliminate the radio."Â* The maneuvers he was talking about are simply, turn right, turn left, and flare. Not intending to be a sport jumper, that's all I needed.Â* Simply pull down on the right, or the left, or both toggles.Â* After an emergency jump the pilot should look up to check the canopy (either round or square), clear any malfunctions (about all you can do is kick your legs and twist at the risers - experienced jumpers can probably add a lot to this), or in the extreme, cut one or more lines if you have the proper tool https://www.ebay.com/itm/US-Air-Force-Parachute-Suspension-Line-Cutter/163102014613?hash=item25f9a33c95:g:-eAAAOSw2q9a55h8.Â* I note with sadness that this tool only has the hook blade.Â* Back in the day we had both the manual hook blade and a switch blade knife, as well. The real benefit, in my opinion, is the higher forward speed, IIRC around 11 kts vs 3 or less for the round canopy, with a 4-line cut or mesh panel at the back, and the quick steering which gives the user the ability to fly to a "better" landing area and turn into the wind, or across the wind, whichever seems better at the time. On 6/22/2018 9:53 PM, wrote: To quote my rigger, when asked about a round vs. squa "A Round will get you down. A Square will get you there." His opinion is that a square, with better directional control and a lower descent rate is a viable and desirable solution for users (or unwilling victims) who have the basic skills to line up into the wind and execute even a minimal flare as the ground approaches. His advice indicates that proper training is definitely recommended, but since we are supposedly experienced aviators with a healthy desire to make it out alive, it is better to be a Pilot In Command of the emergency equipment. A steerable, lower descent rate square chute will beat any of the semi-steerable round chutes commonly used in the sailplane community. (Provided it is implemented correctly.) Of course, because of the higher forward speed of the square design, the implications of landing downwind are a significant concern. But then attempting to land a "steerable" round in high wind conditions also presents a significant danger of being slammed backwards and then dragged. My 2000 Paraphernalia Softie is getting close to the manufacturer's 20 year life limit. I know all the pro vs. con arguments, but since it is my own little pink body that is at stake, I intend to replace the old round with a square and take some training. -- Dan, 5J |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Square Chutes... | sisu1a | Soaring | 4 | December 9th 08 06:04 PM |
Square | sisu1a | Soaring | 0 | December 9th 08 04:59 AM |
running over-square | Dan Luke[_2_] | Piloting | 32 | September 19th 07 07:19 PM |
600 square miles? | Hilton | Piloting | 6 | September 8th 07 04:39 PM |
the square end of the Kiev | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 07 06:10 AM |