If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
CJ wrote:
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message ... "Anthony W" wrote in message news:M3tce.375$7K.98@trnddc06... Juan Jimenez wrote: Kinda pointless suing someone who barely has two nickles to rub together, ain't it? That's probably the reason no one sues you, ain't it? It must be hard to type with Zoom's hand up your ass. Wouldn't know. But you seem to be the expert, why don't you tell us about it? Well, this is a classic. An intelligent ****wad would ignore the insult An average ****wad says, "Wouldn't know...". Juan, connect the dots! Anthony was insulting you! You graced his insult with, "Wouldn't know". I think I speak for many hundreds of people who evaluate you as an avergage ****wad on your best day. Poll? - cj His reply didn't make it back to my server. The reason I and the rest of us here are experts on this, is that we can plainly see the effects of Zoom's hand up juan's ass. Tony |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
"CJ" wrote in message ... Well, this is a classic. An intelligent ****wad would ignore the insult An average ****wad says, "Wouldn't know...". Juan, connect the dots! Anthony was insulting you! You graced his insult with, "Wouldn't know". I think I speak for many hundreds of people who evaluate you as an avergage ****wad on your best day. Poll? What would you know about intelligence? You see, if you were the owner of a IQ in anything over two digits you'd figure out that 1) Anthony doesn't have the brainmass to figure out how to put together a decent insult, let alone one that deserves a response at his level, and 2) there aren't enough people at your level of idiocy for you to claim that you speak for "hundreds". Now, it may be the case that you're suffering from multiple personality disorder, in which case, all I can say is that y'all need help with this personal problem of yours. Any questions? One at a time, please. rofl |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Hmm haven't seen you near my tent either so I guess your "spineless " like me. So do you do the toilet thing too??? LOL!!! How quickly you've forgotten that you don't rate the privilege. Alzheimer's already? *8) Spineless Putz ? That's coming from a guy who won't test fly the BD-4 1/2 he built. Ah, but in my case, ye spineless one, I will have the opportunity to do so, whereas in your case, you can only wish for the opportunity, because you will never, ever have the chance to fly something the likes of which I own. That I can guarantee to you, in writing, stapled to that stripe on your back. chuckle |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Stuart & Kathryn Fields says...
Well Chuck, I assume by your reply that something measurably positive is being created by all of this bashing? Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the posts is to instruct not bash for bashing sake. It evident to me that you missed the point of the postings. Did you go to http://www.ousterhout.net/ to get some background before assuming that there was no positives to all this? Did you do any Google searches to get a feel for what this is all about or are you just playing newsgroup censor? In my opinion zoom is a phony and thru the years he has damaged many peoples name ,reputation and livihoods, is this OK with you? I would hope not. I'm sure the 2 companies he just sued at SnF for non payment of unwanted ads wish they could have been informed before doing business with him. That's the positve message. I wish there was as much creative information about homebuilts here. There is loads of homebuilt info here and from time to time a zoom thread will pop up, run a while and stop .No big deal. Maybe you don't realize that most of the people and companies zoom has hurt are deeply involved in the homebuilt field. People that he bullied into silence while he had his magazine where he controlled the content and never ran a letter to the editor from a lot of us defending our positions. His side was the only one heard for a long time. Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were zoomed have a voice. I never knew that there were more then a couple of us who had been zoomed until I started posting my story on the net. Then the gates opened and the truth about zoom was opened to the light of day. The list of those who have been zoomed reads like a "Who's Who in homebuilt aviation" list. If you look at the relative amount of postings and the content, the name of the newsgroup might be better called "Bashing Practice 101" Maybe from you seemingly uninformed perspective it may seem that way but I respectfully disagree with your conclusions. Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret "zoom can fool most of the people some of the time ,some of the people none of the time& jaun all of the time" anon |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
... Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the posts is to instruct not bash for bashing sake. ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in this country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or maybe you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anything you want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wall because it feels good when you stop. Who knows. Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were zoomed have a voice. And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive mentality... Juan |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
"Stuart & Kathryn Fields" wrote in message ... Well Chuck, I assume by your reply that something measurably positive is being created by all of this bashing? Granted, there is bashing going on, but they are always doing it with the word zoom in the subject. Simply put that word in your filter, and you never will have to look at the zoom bashing again. -- Jim in NC |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 1 May 2005 19:25:29 -0400, "Juan Jimenez"
wrote: "ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message ... Granted there is some bashing in some of the posts but the point of the posts is to instruct not bash for bashing sake. ROFLMAO! Instruct what, that guilt by association is the standard in this country? Perhaps in your native Poland, but certainly not here. Or maybe you're just trying to prove that being dense is an excuse to do anything you want on Usenet? Or maybe you're just banging your head against the wall because it feels good when you stop. Who knows. Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were zoomed have a voice. And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive mentality... Juan Juan, Your post has no relevance to what Chuck posted. Chuck made the point that Jim Campbell had a magazine that he edited and that he used to attack various people and companys. However, he NEVER allowed any "letters to the editor" telling their "side of the story" to be published. The only way the "rest of the story" could be told was RAH and the internet. Only here did everyone have the same ability to post. Jim Campbell soon found out that his lies and accusations would be found out and exposed for the rest of the aviation world to see. It's documented that he said he flew rescue missions in Ethopia... He did not It's documented that he said he fathered a child .... He did not It's documented that he represented himself as a Medical Doctor.... He is not It appears that Jim Campbell hasn't changed any... In that light, it's pretty obvious that RAH is the only menu available for the truth to come out about Jim Campbell. Do you have any suggestions as to a better means to exposing Jim Campbells past and current actions?? Actually, John Ousterhout's website does quite a good job of it and I highly recommend anyone even thinking of believing what Jim Campbell says to check it out thoroughly.... http://www.ousterhout.net/ |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
|
#180
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Juan Jimenez says...
Only thru the Internet and RAH in particular did those of us who were zoomed have a voice. And then again only because not one of you have the gonads to do it in person. Hide behind the keyboard and throw rocks. Such a positive mentality... Seems you have me mixed up with your hero.He sends you to do his dirty work for him since he lacks the courage of his convictions to speak for himself..Did he or did he not sue 2 ex advertizers on the 15 of April? I bet your proud of that .Not rocks just facts,something you don't understand FACTS. Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zoom for Free | Quilljar | Simulators | 2 | January 17th 05 05:57 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
new URL for the Captain Zoom web page | John Ousterhout | Home Built | 20 | August 23rd 04 02:11 AM |
Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 49 | July 22nd 04 06:06 PM |
Old Time RAH Zoom Warriors read this! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 3 | March 23rd 04 02:50 AM |