A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

777 again.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 08, 11:34 PM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks
Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default 777 again.

Eeyore wrote in
:



john bates wrote:

*** I've heard of fly by wire but don't know much about it - What
bugs me is that if it were just engine failure, that must mean that
controls were not affected.


No. The engines didn't fail. This is gross oversimplification by the
press. It was the CONTROL SYSTEM that failed (or the fuel feed).


Yeah right big difference fjukkwit.



Bertie
  #2  
Old January 19th 08, 11:41 PM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks
Aratzio
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 143
Default 777 again.

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:34:32 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip got double secret
probation for writing:

Eeyore wrote in
:



john bates wrote:

*** I've heard of fly by wire but don't know much about it - What
bugs me is that if it were just engine failure, that must mean that
controls were not affected.


No. The engines didn't fail. This is gross oversimplification by the
press. It was the CONTROL SYSTEM that failed (or the fuel feed).


Yeah right big difference fjukkwit.


"Ladies and gentlemen, the engines are fine, they just are not getting
fuel. Those who are staying at downtown hotels will be arriving at
your hotel a little earlier than expected"

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2
  #3  
Old January 20th 08, 12:25 AM posted to alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,alt.usenet.kooks
Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default 777 again.

Aratzio wrote in
:

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:34:32 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip got double secret
probation for writing:

Eeyore wrote in
:



john bates wrote:

*** I've heard of fly by wire but don't know much about it - What
bugs me is that if it were just engine failure, that must mean that
controls were not affected.

No. The engines didn't fail. This is gross oversimplification by the
press. It was the CONTROL SYSTEM that failed (or the fuel feed).


Yeah right big difference fjukkwit.


"Ladies and gentlemen, the engines are fine, they just are not getting
fuel. Those who are staying at downtown hotels will be arriving at
your hotel a little earlier than expected"


Well, exactly.

Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.