My 1 2 3 Test info

"Clem" schreef in bericht
. 97.136...
JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
@news.wanadoo.nl:

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.





Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

Don't know about ABPA, but I posted a couple of pictures to
alt.binaries.pictures.military recently alll about 500 k in size and they
came through fine. I think this should work here too. Posted them one at a
time, though.

Regards,
Herman

Clem..
a full evening resizing???
I can take 500 NEF (RAW) files with my Nikon...
convert them to JPEG
Resize them for posting...
All in less then 15 minutes... all automated too...

Glen in Orlando

Clem wrote:
"Glen in Orlando" wrote in news:48afebf6$0$28433
:

Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.


begin 666 E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg

Attachment decoded: E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg
`
end



I agree you can take a file and resize it. If all you have are a few files
it's worthy way to do it. Some people post 20-30 or more files from an
airshow. They can spend a full evening just to resize each picture.

There are some nice shows around here. I would love to take pictures and
share them, but I need to reduce the overhead. I'm not going to reduce each
one seperately unless it's only a few shots.

I collect nose and tail art that's usually taken in high quality. If you take
a high quality picture that's been reduced, you can enlarge it again with
little loss to the quality of it. The question is, which method of reduction
leads to the least amount of quality loss.

Posting a side by side comparison of different transfer techniques seemed
like a logical way to compare them. I would also like to know how everyone is
receiving the files off their servers.

I'm still having problems just seeing all the standards pictures posted. I
see replies regarding them, but I fail to see some of the original posts and
I'm tired of doing a parent search half the time.

Don't worry, I'm not uploading anymore files that size. If anyone could
recommend software that reduces a batch of files at one time, I would
appreciate hearing about it.

Try this:

http://www.gpsoft.com.au/

OK, it comes at a cost, but the "Tools" "Convert Images" facility is
superb - once you work out what to do.

I understand that Irfanview, free of charge, has a similar facility.

--
Moving things in still pictures!

Clem wrote:
"Glen in Orlando" wrote in news:48afebf6$0$28433
:


Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.


begin 666 E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg

Attachment decoded: E-14209LARGE (Large).jpg
`
end




I agree you can take a file and resize it. If all you have are a few files
it's worthy way to do it. Some people post 20-30 or more files from an
airshow. They can spend a full evening just to resize each picture.

There are some nice shows around here. I would love to take pictures and
share them, but I need to reduce the overhead. I'm not going to reduce each
one seperately unless it's only a few shots.

I collect nose and tail art that's usually taken in high quality. If you take
a high quality picture that's been reduced, you can enlarge it again with
little loss to the quality of it. The question is, which method of reduction
leads to the least amount of quality loss.

Posting a side by side comparison of different transfer techniques seemed
like a logical way to compare them. I would also like to know how everyone is
receiving the files off their servers.

I'm still having problems just seeing all the standards pictures posted. I
see replies regarding them, but I fail to see some of the original posts and
I'm tired of doing a parent search half the time.

Don't worry, I'm not uploading anymore files that size. If anyone could
recommend software that reduces a batch of files at one time, I would
appreciate hearing about it.

You must have missed where I mentioned this. Resize and batch rename
all in one and free.
http://www.faststone.org/

Other free stuff to download also.
Good luck

I really like the photo resizer.

JRW

Clem wrote:
JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
@news.wanadoo.nl:


WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:

Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.






Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

Yes I agree, but that's what the "test" newsgroups are about... ))
Also underused because everyone "tests" in the actual newsgroups...lol
Not a dig at you, just mentioning the tests groups. ))

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Clem..
a full evening resizing???
I can take 500 NEF (RAW) files with my Nikon...
convert them to JPEG
Resize them for posting...
All in less then 15 minutes... all automated too...

Glen in Orlando



Yup, I do it also with my Pentax digital.
I then place the original files to disc and save the resized files to my
backup drive.

You are right Glen, it's easy as hell. I just posted the link for a
batch resizer and batch renamer. You can do it all at once....in less
than 15 minutes..ha ha

http://www.faststone.org/

JRW

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:35:20 -0500, Clem
wrote:

JRW wrote in news:48afee53$0$19192$dbd4b001
:

WTG Glen.........the quality is great. Thanks for posting.

I use Fast Stone photo resizer for all my digital needs. It's fast,easy
to use and I reduce the photos to screensaver size. Fast Stone is free
which is even better.

I agree, what is the point to such large files?

Proving "points" is not what this group is about. But then you'll always
have a few that have to post differently, because they can.
I think far more folks will look if they are posted just like you have
done. I think they'd have then many positive reactions.

JRW

Glen in Orlando wrote:
Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

Glen in Orlando.





Let me ask this question, it's yEnc free.

What is the maximum file size, not lines in a file, but the actual file
size before it's broken into sections by a server? I would say 8K max. Did
anyone elses server reduce my one large file into anything larger than an
8K file?

No, this is not about proving points or anything else except to provide
better through-put on the servers. Until you experiment a little or ask
questions how can you impove on anything?

The units are all mixed up in this thread. 8000 lines perhaps, but 8K
means 8KB, which is minute.

The max for some servers is 1MB per post. For mine it's 10MB. Try it
and see.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Two car salesmen were sitting at the bar.
One complained to the other, "Boy, business sucks. If I don't sell more cars this month, I'm going to lose my ****ing ass."
Too late he noticed a beautiful blonde sitting two stools away.
Immediately, he apologized for his bad language.
"That's okay," the blonde replied, "If I don't sell more ass this month, I'm going to lose my ****ing car."

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:29:35 +0200, "Fabio" wrote:


"Clem" ha scritto nel messaggio
.97.136...
Using Xnews, I............................. I'm not trying to start an
argument, I'm trying to discover the most
effective method to upload as compared to a standard generic upload.

The fact is that actually I got only 7 parts out of 11 . No matter if yenc
or any different program is used, when multipart.. pictures are posted very
often I cant open them.There are always parts missing . As a result I get
only very puzzling jigsaw useless images. I must then find different usenet
links to recover -with some difficulty - what I lost on my news server. So
please, please, please send simple .jpg images!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Agreed - no point in splitting unless it's very very big. And I can
post 10MB in one article without splitting.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Mrs. Jones went to see her doctor.
When he inquired about her complaint she replied that she suffered from a discharge.
He instructed her to get undressed and lie down on the examining table. She did so.
The doctor put on rubber gloves and began to massage her private parts.
After a couple of minutes he asked, "How does that feel?"
"Wonderful," she replied, "but the discharge is from the ear."

On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:52:31 -0400, "Glen in Orlando"
wrote:

Hey Clem...
the most effective method, as compared to your three posts.. is right
here....
Resized to a whopping 135kb...
Quck, easy, and guess what.. a good old fashioned JPEG....
I can view anything posted here...yENC, Mime, etc..etc..
but WHAT IS THE POINT?

The point is you've removed half the data in the file.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.

There is a test binary group. May I suggest using that so that you don't
flood this group until you are prepared to post. Not trying to be a smart
a.. - just a friendly suggestion as I know you were trying to accomplish
something good.


"Clem" wrote in message
. 97.136...
Using Xnews, I just did 3 uploads of an F-4 picture file which shows
almost
4KB.

The first test was a straight upload. It was broke into 10 files of 8K and
one at 5714.

The second was with MIME. It also was broke into 11 files with very near
the
same results.

The third test was an upload in yEnc. This time the file was broke into
only
10 sections nine of which were in the 3200 range and one in the 2000
range.

Someone said yEnc creates a larger file. I'm at a loss how that is figured
seeing as this test indicates the opposit.

I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm trying to discover the most
effective method to upload as compared to a standard generic upload.