I wish I had never gotten into this...

Kate referred to math.

She implied a substitute therefor.

She gave testimony,
providing her insight,
and expert testimony
on
feminine logic.

That may of course be a contradictory concept,
a conundrum,

worth arguing on fact;

but, of no use in argument
with the fairer sex.

Without stating so,
feminine logic was offered up to be superior to
or the superlative
to
the need for math.

Would that be
The New Math,

Miss Kate?

Is it that:

The Math That Rules is
Feminine Math.

That is your premise .

Being that the fairer sex is inately self-regulating
and self-ministering,
being it continues incessant locution and changing
and ranging
opinion,
being it forever postulates and discusses
with feminine cooperatives, who speak at the same
time,

being that the fairer sex

defines the order of things,
makes the rules,
and
keeps the score.

And it seems that
guys drool;
and
just want more;
and
never know
what's the
score ?

Girls rule ? Evermore ?

The New Math.
A feminine construct .

With kindest obedience,
I remain
subject.


Dancing on clouds,

Keep it up!

Jim Culp USA
GatorCity, Florida
Std Libelle