A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The President Is Not Making Any Friends With His 3,000 Square Mile TFRs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 05, 07:49 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The President Is Not Making Any Friends With His 3,000 Square Mile TFRs


What can be done to keep this President in the White House? He's got
over 2,000 square miles of airspace restricted there. Believe me, no
one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.



http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...nes-california

4 Planes Forced to Land in Breach of Airspace During Bush's Visit
The small-craft pilots are grounded at area airports during Rancho
Cucamonga appearance.

By Susannah Rosenblatt, Times Staff Writer

Fighter jets forced four small airplanes to land Monday after they
strayed into restricted airspace during President Bush's visit to
Rancho Cucamonga, federal officials said.

Secret Service agents and local law enforcement officials detained and
questioned at least three of the pilots, who were forced to land their
private aircraft at airports in Corona, El Monte, Hawthorne and Hemet,
said Lt. Jody Vazquez, spokeswoman for North American Aerospace
Defense Command, or NORAD.

No arrests were made, but the Federal Aviation Administration will
determine whether any of the pilots should face sanctions, Vazquez
said.

As the president delivered remarks on Medicare and immigration, 30
nautical miles around Ontario International Airport and Rancho
Cucamonga were off-limits to most planes except military, law
enforcement, commercial and special FAA-approved aircraft, said FAA
spokesman Donn Walker.

The undisclosed number of patrol F-16s shot two flares each across the
nose of two of the planes to attract the pilots' attention and force
them to land, said Vazquez and Chris Butler, resident agent in charge
for the Secret Service in Riverside.

The flares are "one way we can try to say, 'Hey, look, you are not
where you're supposed to be," said Vazquez, who added that several
other aircraft entered the restricted zone but left immediately after
the FAA contacted them.

The couple that landed at Corona Municipal Airport had been headed to
Southern California from Northern California and were unaware of the
flight advisory Monday, Butler said.

In another of the four incidents, Marcel Avery, 62, was flying his
four-seat Cessna 182 from Hawthorne to Scottsdale, Ariz., when an F-16
appeared at his left side and waggled its wing at him twice, he
said."I was very, very surprised to see an F-16 on my wing," said
Avery, a 30-year flying veteran who said he had carefully plotted his
course with his flight instructor to avoid the restricted area.

The Manhattan Beach resident was grounded about two hours; Hemet
police and an FBI agent made a copy of his pilot's license and
searched his plane."It was a bit confusing — I didn't really
understand and think I should be [grounded]," Avery said.

"On the other hand, you don't argue with the police, and you don't
argue with the FAA. They tell you to do something and you do it, or
you suffer dire consequences."
....

  #2  
Old August 31st 05, 11:52 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Larry Dighera wrote:
What can be done to keep this President in the White House? He's got
over 2,000 square miles of airspace restricted there. Believe me, no
one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.


Expect a bunch of GA trained Saudis & Co. to remain in CA, a 9/11 cell
was from SD.

JG

  #3  
Old September 1st 05, 12:22 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 31 Aug 2005 15:52:37 -0700, wrote in
.com::


Expect a bunch of GA trained Saudis & Co. to remain in CA, a 9/11 cell
was from SD.


I'm sorry, but I'm unable to parse that comma-spliced sentence.

  #4  
Old September 1st 05, 01:38 AM
Mike Weller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:49:20 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:


Believe me, no
one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.


Where is Los Angeles?

I saw a movie where it slid off into the Pacific Ocean.

Mike Weller


  #5  
Old September 1st 05, 09:51 PM
Yossarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I know this guy and the instructor in question. In fact I was with the
instructor when the guy called afterwards to talk about the incident.
He has no business playing the role of a victim as it sounds in the
article. He was made aware of the TFR by the instructor (who did not
plot any course with him), signs all over the airport office, and most
likely flight service if he bothered to call.

Larry Dighera wrote:

In another of the four incidents, Marcel Avery, 62, was flying his
four-seat Cessna 182 from Hawthorne to Scottsdale, Ariz., when an F-16
appeared at his left side and waggled its wing at him twice, he
said."I was very, very surprised to see an F-16 on my wing," said
Avery, a 30-year flying veteran who said he had carefully plotted his
course with his flight instructor to avoid the restricted area.

The Manhattan Beach resident was grounded about two hours; Hemet
police and an FBI agent made a copy of his pilot's license and
searched his plane."It was a bit confusing - I didn't really
understand and think I should be [grounded]," Avery said.

"On the other hand, you don't argue with the police, and you don't
argue with the FAA. They tell you to do something and you do it, or
you suffer dire consequences."
...


  #6  
Old September 1st 05, 11:21 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 1 Sep 2005 13:51:21 -0700, "Yossarian"
wrote in .com::

I know this guy and the instructor in question. In fact I was with the
instructor when the guy called afterwards to talk about the incident.
He has no business playing the role of a victim as it sounds in the
article.


Given the fact that the F-16s had to fire flairs to get the pilot's
attention, I would have to agree with you. I'm wondering why he
didn't he tune to 121.5 MHz per intercept procedures. Did the CFI
brief those procedures?

  #7  
Old September 2nd 05, 01:45 AM
Jim Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Dighera wrote:

What can be done to keep this President in the White House?


A lot of us were asking the same thing about this time last year.

He's got
over 2,000 square miles of airspace restricted there. Believe me, no
one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.


Well to be sure, we are talking about THIS President I believe, so we have a flawed premise fallacy
there. If we were afraid of lies we should be talking about the LAST President.

  #8  
Old September 2nd 05, 05:24 AM
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Weller wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote:


Believe me, no one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.


Where is Los Angeles?

I saw a movie where it slid off into the Pacific Ocean.


Escape from L.A. (1996)
http://imdb.com/title/tt0116225

Another film about turning a major city into a prison:

Escape from New York (1981)
http://imdb.com/title/tt0082340

Can New Orleans be far behind?
  #9  
Old September 2nd 05, 06:00 AM
Yossarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He told the CFI that he tried 121.5 but got no response. How true that
is I have no idea. Instead he was able to contact Socal Approach who
said that they had been watching him for a while and that he needed to
land immediately.

He wasn't one of the ones that got flares. I think that would look
kinda cool personally (as long as it wasn't my license on the line


Larry Dighera wrote:
On 1 Sep 2005 13:51:21 -0700, "Yossarian"
wrote in .com::

I know this guy and the instructor in question. In fact I was with the
instructor when the guy called afterwards to talk about the incident.
He has no business playing the role of a victim as it sounds in the
article.


Given the fact that the F-16s had to fire flairs to get the pilot's
attention, I would have to agree with you. I'm wondering why he
didn't he tune to 121.5 MHz per intercept procedures. Did the CFI
brief those procedures?


  #10  
Old September 2nd 05, 08:03 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Taylor" wrote in message
...
He's got
over 2,000 square miles of airspace restricted there. Believe me, no
one wants to hear his lies in Los Angeles.


Well to be sure, we are talking about THIS President I believe, so we
have a flawed premise fallacy there. If we were afraid of lies we
should be talking about the LAST President.


Huh? Getting reelected made him a different person?

For sure, "the LAST President" -- that is, the one in office from 2000 to
2004 -- told plenty of lies. And unlike the previous one, his lies got tens
of thousands of people killed.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution WalterM140 Military Aviation 20 July 2nd 04 04:09 PM
Ambassador Wilson to Out Bush Regime Leaker of CIA Operative MORRIS434 Military Aviation 0 May 1st 04 01:05 AM
Making my landing gear Lou Parker Home Built 8 March 31st 04 10:34 PM
LONG DEPLOYMENTS, BENEFIT CUTS ERODE SUPPORT FOR PRESIDENT Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 0 March 17th 04 07:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.