Small turbines for homebuilts?

...Not enough thrust for take-off ...

If your plane is small enough...

http://flight.cz/cricri/photos/unsor...10_gallery.jpg

Piero

Bill Daniels wrote:
"Rich S." wrote in message
. ..

"Morgans" wrote in message
...

Lets see, what if you put 6 or 8 of those 50 pound thrust units in a
jetpack
type of arrangement. You should be able to maintain level hovering

flight,

right? Fuel demands would mean that you could not hover for very long,
but
it would be much longer than the current jet packs in use, right?

You know, if I had enough money, I might just take that project on!

Damn, Jim. I'd spend a buck to watch!

Rich S.


You guy thinking of trying for a 'Darwin Award'?


Hey, live in fame, go down in flames

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

If your plane is small enough...

http://flight.cz/cricri/photos/unsor...10_gallery.jpg

I believe that plane lifted off from the roof of a speeding car, so really,
not enough to take off. Perhaps if you had a very very long runway? g
--
Jim in NC

"clipclip" wrote in message
...

David Findlay Wrote:
Has there been any development of small jet engines for light aircraft,
like
the engines used on the Eclipse 500? Small turbines would be great for
high
performance homebuilts if they were cheap enough. Anything down to the
price level that could compete with high horsepower Lycoming's or
Continentals? Thanks,

David

there are "scratch designed & built" 150 hp-equivalent turboprop
engines on the market - check out www.innodyn.com - they flew to
oshkosh with a turbine equipped super cub (
http://www.innodyn.com/aviation/news..._05_05_01.html ).
furthermore, they claim to burn only slightly more than a piston
engine, which i find remarkable. they say they have a twinpac planned
which would output 300 hp.

francois


--
clipclip

If you read more carefully, Innodyne is taking existing turbines and adding
their fuel control system. Also, given the consensus that a turbine simply
can't offer the specific fuel consumption (or even close) to a recip, their
data on fuel consumption (or rather, the lack of hard data) seems suspicious
to me.

Innodyne has been in this game for years and to the best of my knowledge
have never delivered a single customer engine. I'd stay away until they
have a track record and can provide substantial independant confirmation of
their fuel consumption claims.

KB