If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
http://www.eaach1.org/Design/comm6v1-1R4.pdf
Subject at hand: Landing gear design. Article in above link pretty much puts into words my understanding of why tail draggers do what they do. I've been thinking about an original design for cheap one man flying (OK, lots of borrowed stuff put together in my own unique way) and one of the little problems I keep coming up with is cross wind control. Around here if it won't land in a 10 Knot (gusting 30) side wind it's a fair weather toy. For structural and weigh reasons a conventional 2 up front gear would work best, but as we all know it isn't the best choice for low time modern pilots, or cross wind conditions. A simple solution is a castering main gear similar to John Moody's as used on the Easy Riser. The problem then becomes one of ground handling due to lack of directional control with respect to the ground. Complexity rules out a fixed tail and steering main gear. 2 solutions: 1) Angle the axis of the castoring main gear so that the weight of the craft tends to align the casters with the axis of the plane, or use a locking, maybe semi locking as used in the nose gear of the BD-5, castoring main gear. One could then use a conventional steering tail wheel. 2) Pure differential braking in combination with a negative king pin inclination - no lock or de-tent on main gear. I'm open to all ideas and references to other planes that have used similar gear - there must be some somewhere? I have not had the option of examining an Ercoupe gear so any links to pics/parts manuals would be appreciated. The B-52 gear is not under consideration.................... :-) ====================== Leon McAtee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
On Jul 9, 10:50*am, "
wrote: http://www.eaach1.org/Design/comm6v1-1R4.pdf Subject at hand: *Landing gear design. Article in above link pretty much puts into words my understanding of why tail draggers do what they do. *I've been thinking about an original design for cheap one man flying (OK, lots of borrowed stuff put together in my own unique way) and one of the little problems I keep coming up with is cross wind control. *Around here if it won't land in a 10 Knot (gusting 30) side wind it's a fair weather toy. For structural and weigh reasons a conventional 2 up front gear would work best, but as we all know it isn't the best choice for low time modern pilots, or cross wind conditions. *A simple solution is a castering main gear similar to John Moody's as used on the Easy Riser. *The problem then becomes one of ground handling due to lack of directional control with respect to the ground. *Complexity rules out a fixed tail and steering main gear. 2 solutions: 1) * * Angle the axis of the castoring main gear so that the weight of the craft tends to align the casters with the axis of the plane, or use a locking, maybe semi locking as used in the nose gear of the BD-5, castoring main gear. *One could then use a conventional steering tail wheel. 2) * * Pure differential braking in combination with a negative king pin inclination *- no lock or de-tent on main gear. I'm open to all ideas and references to other planes that have used similar gear - there must be some somewhere? I have not had the option of examining an Ercoupe gear so any links to pics/parts manuals would be appreciated. *The B-52 gear is not under consideration.................... *:-) ====================== Leon McAtee I recall flying a Cessna 170 with "crosswind gear" which was a sort of castering main gear. It was the worst handling taildragger I have ever flown. Almost all 170 owners modified their airplanes to non- castering mains. If you plan oleo type hydraulic struts for your mains, the alignment "scissors" can be skewed so the wheels steer outboard (increase toe- out) as the strut compresses. It sort of "steers into the skid" as the airplane swerves and transfers weight onto the outer wheel. That gives you an extra second or two to 'catch it" as a groundloop starts. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
Conventional gear design - no toe in - or out.
Build it as straight as you can. Then learn to fly it... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
On Jul 9, 11:40*pm, cavelamb wrote:
Conventional gear design - no toe in - or out. Build it as straight as you can. Then learn to fly it... You kind of missed my objective. I learned in a PA-12 but I'm not thinking just about myself. Many others can't or are unwilling to learn. If you want new blood (pun not intended) in the sport you have to cater the wants and - abilities - of the masses. Once we get them some stick time then they can transition to something more conventional,if they so desire. Besides, think Ercoupe, Flea, Spratt. No cross control possible. Imagine trying to land an otherwise stock Ercoupe converted to tail wheel :-) Editorial comment: If we don't find a way to get the next generation in the air for fun and recreation then the TSA/Homeland Security bunch will see to it that Class A airspace is lowered to 1000' AGL.........."for your protection" $50K LSAs won't do it! ======================= Leon McAtee |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
On Jul 10, 9:47*am, Ray Adair wrote:
Good point! We could learn from the amateur radio experience. Good analogy! I'm one you lost from the amateur radio ranks. My brain just doesn't work in the way needed to master code at a rate fast enough to pass the old tests. As a result I left something I found quite interesting. If there had been an alternate route to getting involved maybe I would have kept at it. Who knows what I might have learned in the last 40 years??? ================ Leon McAtee |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pick your brains?
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: http://www.eaach1.org/Design/comm6v1-1R4.pdf Subject at hand: Landing gear design. Article in above link pretty much puts into words my understanding of why tail draggers do what they do. I've been thinking about an original design for cheap one man flying (OK, lots of borrowed stuff put together in my own unique way) and one of the little problems I keep coming up with is cross wind control. Around here if it won't land in a 10 Knot (gusting 30) side wind it's a fair weather toy. For structural and weigh reasons a conventional 2 up front gear would work best, but as we all know it isn't the best choice for low time modern pilots, or cross wind conditions. A simple solution is a castering main gear similar to John Moody's as used on the Easy Riser. The problem then becomes one of ground handling due to lack of directional control with respect to the ground. Complexity rules out a fixed tail and steering main gear. 2 solutions: 1) Angle the axis of the castoring main gear so that the weight of the craft tends to align the casters with the axis of the plane, or use a locking, maybe semi locking as used in the nose gear of the BD-5, castoring main gear. One could then use a conventional steering tail wheel. 2) Pure differential braking in combination with a negative king pin inclination - no lock or de-tent on main gear. I'm open to all ideas and references to other planes that have used similar gear - there must be some somewhere? I have not had the option of examining an Ercoupe gear so any links to pics/parts manuals would be appreciated. The B-52 gear is not under consideration.................... :-) ====================== Leon McAtee I have a 25 year old W8 tailwind. this can be landed in conditions with the windsock rigid across the strip. this seems to be what you are attempting. the key is the tailwheel which has a solid link from the rudder bellcrank to the tailwheel control lug. any time you have the wheel (a 4" homebuilders solid wheel from aircraft spruce) on the ground you can steer the tail into position. the bellcrank at the rudder is half the distance out from centre that the tailwheel control lug is. the other requirement is that the neutral position of the tailwheel matches the neutral position of the rudder. the toe in/toe out argument regarding the mains is resolved by considering the dynamics occurring during a swing during landing. if you are turning to the right then the aircraft inertia is thrown to the outside of the turn which presses the left wheel harder onto the pavement. if this wheel at that moment is pointing in the direction of travel then it contributes no additional forces that you have to get under control. for this reason the undercarriage leg should flex into a toe out position. it is irrelevant what the static parked wheel position is within reason. understand Wittman's W8 undercarriage and you will have your solution. Stealth Pilot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Radio Should I Pick???? | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 19 | June 3rd 08 08:22 PM |
pick your poison on tow | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | April 1st 06 07:42 AM |
Where to pick up passengers at HPN? | Roberto Waltman | Piloting | 8 | August 22nd 04 05:52 PM |
Air Force asking some NCOs to pick new fields | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 27th 04 12:57 AM |
Pilot's Brains Develop Differently | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | August 22nd 03 04:48 AM |