A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why didn't GWB join the U.S. Air Force ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old July 13th 04, 08:25 PM
Brooks Gregory
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ace" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:45:21 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:

Go find yourself a playmate kid. I was in the political arena way too

long
to play your games.


The truth is too painful to admit. I see.


Yea, if that works, take it.

PLONK


  #72  
Old July 13th 04, 09:59 PM
ian maclure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:24:01 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:

[snip]

So do flying officers in the US Air Force go through six weeks of training --
as enlisted men -- and then are commissioned as officers?


What part of Ed Rasimus' explanation did you not understand?
And what was common 30 years ago is probably not so today.

The reason for that is pretty clear. Bush skipped out on the last two years
of his commitment.


No he did not. This too has been explained in detail by those who
have some chance of getting it right.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #73  
Old July 14th 04, 01:02 AM
Leslie Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ace:

Do your homework. Fact- not opinion, fact- is that eht so-called "popular
vote" was undecided. A statistical tie, more accurately. We will *never*
know who actually received the most votes, because:

1) Not all votes were counted. It's legal in most places to discard votes
if they won't tip the electoral scales. Therefore, in the "Bush" states
many Gore votes (and potential additional Bush votes) were discarded, and
vice versa.
2) Out of the votes that *were* counted, the totals were within the margin
of errors of the mechanical counting systems used. Even with "perfectly"
filled out ballots, the machine counters have margins of error (within a 95%
confidence interval) of ~3% of total votes cast. Basically, any vote tally
within 6% of each other is at least 5% chance we gave the win to the wrong
guy . . . as teh tallies get closer, the probability of error gets higher.
3) *Now* you may apply whatever sense of the typical "irregularites"
(10,000 absentee ballots discarded in Florida) you feel exist, and hte
margins are even higher.

STOP REPEATING HTE "GORE WON POPULAR ELECTION" BULL****!

You are no longer ignorant- if you repeat this lie, you are evil.

Steve Swartz





"Ace" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:

Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you

think
that was pure coincidence?

Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by
trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore.
They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat
down there since 1963.

Who won the popular vote?


Who won the Grammy?


I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a
different question.

I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner.



  #74  
Old July 14th 04, 01:03 AM
Leslie Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are one ignorant- or evil- SOB, Ace.

Steve Swartz



"Ace" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:25:13 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:

The truth is too painful to admit. I see.


Yea, if that works, take it.

PLONK


Another one bites the dust!!!



  #75  
Old July 14th 04, 01:47 AM
D. Strang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ace" wrote
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 01:24:12 -0500, "D. Strang"
"Ace" wrote

Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think
that was pure coincidence?


Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by
trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore.
They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat
down there since 1963.


Who won the popular vote?


Who cares.


  #76  
Old July 14th 04, 04:45 AM
Mike Williamson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WalterM140 wrote:
He didn't go to officer candidate school because the Air National Guard
doesn't have one. You have been told that repeatedly but keep
repeating the same old tired lies even when you know they are lies.



Someone -- I didn't keep track -- said that Bush DID go to OTS. When I asked
if OTS attendees were considered to be enlisted men, I got nothing back.


Personnel attending officer training programs typically do have
enlisted rank, even if only for administrative purposes (IIRC, I was an
E-2 while in ROTC in college, although the closest I ever came to
wearing a uniform with enlisted rank were the cadet ranks during my
first two years of ROTC).

Several enlisted troops in my group have been selected for OTS, and
will maintain their enlisted rank until completion of training, at which
time they will be discharged from enlisted service and then sworn in
as 2Lt's.

Mike Williamson

  #77  
Old July 14th 04, 04:52 AM
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Ace wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:

Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think
that was pure coincidence?

Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by
trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore.
They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat
down there since 1963.

Who won the popular vote?


Who won the Grammy?


I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a
different question.

I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner.


According to the Constitution, he was.

You've heard of the document, I suspect.
  #78  
Old July 14th 04, 04:59 AM
Mike Williamson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

George Z. Bush wrote:


That does not change a thing. Whether or not you agree, the ANG is NOT a part
of the active establishment until it is federalized and activated. Until that
time, they answer to their governors only, regardless of where the money for
their operations comes from.


Not strictly true- they follow the appropriate Regulations or
Instructions appropriate to their service and operational requirements.
In the Air Force these would be all of the appropriate Air Force
Instructions (AFIs).

In addition, they are inspected and evaluated under a program
which includes Guard and Reserve representation, but they are
inspected under the same standards as active duty units and
their inspection teams will have both active and non-active members.

Mike

  #79  
Old July 14th 04, 05:16 AM
Mike Williamson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ace wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:


Is it following the law to vote along partisan lines? Or do you think
that was pure coincidence?

Go play with your chads. Chicago and New York screwed-up by
trying to trust the Cubans to elect them. The Cubans don't like Gore.
They don't like Kerry either. The Democrats have missed the boat
down there since 1963.

Who won the popular vote?


Who won the Grammy?



I see. When you find an uncomfortable question you answer with a
different question.

I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner.


In point of fact, no one won a majority of the popular vote, nor did
they in the previous presidential election. But neither of those
tidbits are relevant to the discussion, as the President of the United
States has never been elected via a popular vote. The number of
people in the news (including, IIRC, Chelsea Clinton) who expressed
surprise and dismay at this fact should be made to retake high school
civics. As should those who still seem to cling to it as though it
does, or ever did, have some relevance. If you want a leader elected
through direct popular vote, move to -- hmm, having a hard time
finding one. Even Castro was listed as being elected via
"legislative vote."

Mike

  #80  
Old July 14th 04, 06:27 AM
Ian MacLure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steve Hix wrote in
:

In article ,
Ace wrote:

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:47:07 GMT, "Brooks Gregory"
wrote:


[snip

I'll give you a hint. George Bush wasn't the winner.


According to the Constitution, he was.

You've heard of the document, I suspect.


Hmmm, might be an unsafe bet on this occasion.

IBM


__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 10th 04 11:06 PM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Air Force announces acquisition management reorganization Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 21st 03 09:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.