A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Where are the armed pilots?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old December 25th 03, 12:59 AM
Brien K. Meehan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message link.net...

Let's
say that somebody notices that I am armed and calls the cops. In fact,
let's HOPE that somebody notices that I'm armed and calls the cops. That's
certainly what I would do if I saw someone who was carrying a gun on the
flight line.


Why in the world would you call the cops?
  #32  
Old December 25th 03, 01:40 AM
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michelle P wrote:

Nomen,
In Canada literally anywhere outside of Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto,
Montreal, and Quebec. In the USA only in Alaska if I remember correctly.
The 9mm Glock stays in the Night stand unless I am heading to the pistol
range.

Cats: Three; one indoor, one indoor/outdoor, one outdoor.

Michelle


Awww, a woman who packs heat. Probably married too.

Ron Lee
  #33  
Old December 25th 03, 05:08 AM
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Brien K. Meehan) wrote in
om:

Judah wrote in message
. ..


snip

Perhaps that has provided the hint that innocent people can be shot
dead while they walk down the street.


That's true. It's always been true.

Perhaps, then, it is too risky to walk down the street.


That's absurd. Only an idiot would draw (or suggest) that as a
logical conclusion.


Of course it's absurd. That's my point. It is no more or less absurd than
the OP who drew the conclusion that it is too risky to fly on an airplane
without an armed pilot, due to the hint that was provided on 9/11.

snip

So, maybe it wasn't a terrorist, but it was some other flavor of
criminal. Who? Is this incident documented somewhere? I'd like to
read more about it.



Here's one. It's not the same story that I alluded to in my earlier post,
but the point is the same. The OP would probably draw the following
conclusion: It's not safe to eat in restaurants because you might be shot
by a mobster if you don't like the entertainment.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast....reut/index.ht
ml

Go ahead and live your life in fear.


Uh, no, thanks, I'll just continue to be free and happy as I have
been.


I know of many people today who are living in fear because of the recent
incidents. They listen to these wonderful stories that the media tells, and
believe it's Armageddon and their life is in imminent danger. They run
around in a panic telling everyone to stay out of their local Town Hall
building because it could be a terrorist target. They think that the entire
world, terrorists, mobsters, and all, revolve around them.

They live in a delusional, self-serving, state of constant panic, fearing
the one and only thing in life that is guaranteed - Death.

I prefer freedom.


Based on this post, I have to wonder if you know what that means.



I believe you either read my post out of context, or you misread it
altogether. Perhaps this approach is more direct and will better clarify my
opinion.

Not that my opinion is so important in the overall scheme of things...
  #34  
Old December 25th 03, 01:44 PM
Brien K. Meehan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Judah wrote in message .. .

Of course it's absurd. That's my point. It is no more or less absurd than
the OP who drew the conclusion that it is too risky to fly on an airplane
without an armed pilot, due to the hint that was provided on 9/11.


That compares apples and oranges. These analogies make no sense.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast....reut/index.ht
ml


One interesting thing about this incident is that it took place in New
York City, where only the criminals are allowed to have guns.

I believe you either read my post out of context, or you misread it
altogether. Perhaps this approach is more direct and will better clarify my
opinion.


I think I read it just fine, but you're offering badly twisted logic
as a basis for equating vigilance with paranoia or cowardice. In real
life, it doesn't work that way.

Not that my opinion is so important in the overall scheme of things...


I'm glad that you're sharing it. :-)
  #35  
Old December 25th 03, 03:50 PM
Michelle P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron,

No I am not married, but you had better not enter my bedroom without
permission ;-) I have a 95+% kill rate at the range. I hit where I aim.

Michelle

Ron Lee wrote:

Michelle P wrote:



Nomen,
In Canada literally anywhere outside of Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto,
Montreal, and Quebec. In the USA only in Alaska if I remember correctly.
The 9mm Glock stays in the Night stand unless I am heading to the pistol
range.

Cats: Three; one indoor, one indoor/outdoor, one outdoor.

Michelle



Awww, a woman who packs heat. Probably married too.

Ron Lee



--

Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P

"Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike)

Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic

Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity

  #37  
Old December 25th 03, 09:36 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default





What a sad way to live - basing decisions on probabilities of things
happening....


That's how you make 99% of your decisions.

  #38  
Old December 25th 03, 10:54 PM
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron,

No I am not married, but you had better not enter my bedroom without
permission ;-) I have a 95+% kill rate at the range. I hit where I aim.

Michelle


hmmm, I'm afraid to ask how you know that rate...


Does not matter. I will stay out of Canada just to be on the safe
side.

Ron Lee
  #39  
Old December 26th 03, 12:18 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They're hard to field dress when you shoot them with a camera. :~)


"Michelle P" wrote in message
ink.net...
Tom,
No, It is usually for bears, Polar bears if necessary, elk, deer. If I
ever had to shoot a rabbit or squirrel I would have to aim and hit the
head. It would be for protection and I would hope not to be stuck out
long enough to have to shoot and eat an animal. I would rather shoot
them with my camera.
Michelle

Tom Sixkiller wrote:

"Michelle P" wrote in message
link.net...


Nomen,
I only carry a firearm when required to do so. Then it will be my 7mm
Remington Magnum rifle. It makes a good survival weapon.
Michelle



Hope you don't have to survive by shooting rabbits or squirrels. :~)



  #40  
Old December 26th 03, 12:19 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

"Newps" wrote in message

news:UgjGb.642095$Tr4.1649643@attbi_s03...



Damn near .50 cal, that's what. And with the 2X scope pretty heavy too.

They used them for hunting buffalo...up close.


...and personal!!!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.