Lets go have lunch with Dr. Phil

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote: On Thu, 16
Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:

Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
www.turiss.com

Not good, not good at all.

How the hell do they get it to do that?

Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?

Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.

The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
company.

If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
good at all".

Turiss was Computer Forensic Group Inc and was acquired by
LanpherWilson Corp renamed Turiss, a digital investigations and
information protection firm with target markets in the corporate,
legal and government arenas. LWC is a subsidiary of Google, Inc.

Phil wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote: On Thu, 16
Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:

Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
www.turiss.com
Not good, not good at all.
How the hell do they get it to do that?
Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
company.
If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
good at all".



smile

Silence, thou rough beast!

Bob

none wrote:
Phil wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:19:19 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote: On Thu, 16
Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:

Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
www.turiss.com
Not good, not good at all.
How the hell do they get it to do that?
Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
company.
If Google bought the company from Phil Mellinger then anyone posting
to newsgroups is completely exposed. Threats have been made. Threats
of bodily injury, identity theft and death. I repeat "Not good, not
good at all".



smile

Silence, thou rough beast!

Bob

whoops...

Sorry, Phil. I thought I was "in" alt.slack


Bob

Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:12:19 +0000 (UTC), Anthony Atkielski wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:46:57 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:45:23 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote: On Thu, 16
Dec 2010 19:41:22 -0500, vern wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:37:36 -0500, Linton Yarbrough wrote:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500, Justin Eriksen wrote:

Be careful. Note what happens when you click on Ari's link.
www.turiss.com
Not good, not good at all.
How the hell do they get it to do that?
Wrong question. The correct question is /why/ does the link to /that/
particular site? Followed by how the hell would /they/ allow that?
Google only allows very few to do that. Not good, not good at all.
The _only_ way Google allows this redirection is if they own the
company.

We have a winner.

Where do I go to cash in?

Bon Bob

LOng live America!

Long live Israel!

Long live Great Britain!