homebuilt UAV's?

http://aar400.tc.faa.gov/Programs/Fl.../reqcertop.htm

Ran across this, and a few other pages after a Google but haven't yet
found an answer........

Some of the models planes are larger, faster, and more complex than
some human carrying aircraft. The large scale B-52 with 8 turbines
comes to mind.

Just where is the line drawn - if it is at all - between an FAA
regulated UAV and a model plane? Is it size, speed, weight, use
(commercial/hobby), or autonomy that's the deciding factor?

========================
Leon McAtee

On 8 Oct 2005 09:18:09 -0700, "
wrote:

http://aar400.tc.faa.gov/Programs/Fl.../reqcertop.htm

Ran across this, and a few other pages after a Google but haven't yet
found an answer........

Some of the models planes are larger, faster, and more complex than
some human carrying aircraft. The large scale B-52 with 8 turbines
comes to mind.

Just where is the line drawn - if it is at all - between an FAA
regulated UAV and a model plane? Is it size, speed, weight, use
(commercial/hobby), or autonomy that's the deciding factor?

========================
Leon McAtee

if australian regulations are a guide it is weight and location flown.

RC models such as the B-52 (which was an extraordinary effort, and not
your everyday RC model, BTW), I would not consider UAV's in the sense of
UAV's. They remain in visual range of the pilot, which actually isn't
very far.

RC pilots are not a threat to "full size" aviation, unless someone is
stupid enough to break the rules about flying too close to airports.

John

Forgot to mention. In the US, the governing body Academy of Model
Aeronautics (AMA), designates 55# as the max wieght limit for model
planes. This can be exceeded with a waiver, which is fairly easy to obtain.
The other side of this coin is, membership isn't madatory. You can fly
without AMA. Most people who belong to the AMA do it for the insurance.

John

RC pilots are not a threat to "full size" aviation, unless someone is
stupid enough to break the rules about flying too close to airports.

John

Hope I wasn't implying that R/C guys were a threat. that was most
definatly not my intent. I'm more interested in the point where the
FAA might be a significant concearn.

What I have in mind is commercial venture using a 1/4 scale sized UAV
used for aerial observation at ranges of 10 to 20 miles and elevations
of up to 1000 ft AGL. Payload for video and radio link only needs to
be about 2 to 3 lbs. The missions would be repetitive in nature and
could possibly be flown autonomously.

The UAV needed would be well under the #55 limit mentioned but would
need to be operated out of visual sight.
=================
Leon McAtee

There's an R/C airfield that is alarmingly close to the Van Nuys airfield in
SoCal. It is watched pretty closely, but I would hardly consider the R/C
guys to not be a "threat". There have been incidents. You should see the
place. Talk about "too close to airports".

"John T" wrote in message
...
RC models such as the B-52 (which was an extraordinary effort, and not
your everyday RC model, BTW), I would not consider UAV's in the sense of
UAV's. They remain in visual range of the pilot, which actually isn't
very far.

RC pilots are not a threat to "full size" aviation, unless someone is
stupid enough to break the rules about flying too close to airports.

John

Pete Schaefer wrote:

There's an R/C airfield that is alarmingly close to the Van Nuys airfield
in SoCal. It is watched pretty closely, but I would hardly consider the
R/C guys to not be a "threat". There have been incidents. You should see
the place. Talk about "too close to airports".

I used to fly at an uncontrolled where people would fly R/C at the airport.
Nice Sunday afternoon, you'd have R/C's, gliders, sky divers, ag planes,
and the odd helicopter. Kept life interesting.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

bowman wrote:
Pete Schaefer wrote:


There's an R/C airfield that is alarmingly close to the Van Nuys airfield
in SoCal. It is watched pretty closely, but I would hardly consider the
R/C guys to not be a "threat". There have been incidents. You should see
the place. Talk about "too close to airports".


I used to fly at an uncontrolled where people would fly R/C at the airport.
Nice Sunday afternoon, you'd have R/C's, gliders, sky divers, ag planes,
and the odd helicopter. Kept life interesting.


What would have been more interesting would be to have a friend at
their field with a transmitter while you fly patterns.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:07:53 -0500, "Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired"
wrote:

bowman wrote:
Pete Schaefer wrote:


There's an R/C airfield that is alarmingly close to the Van Nuys airfield
in SoCal. It is watched pretty closely, but I would hardly consider the
R/C guys to not be a "threat". There have been incidents. You should see
the place. Talk about "too close to airports".


I used to fly at an uncontrolled where people would fly R/C at the airport.
Nice Sunday afternoon, you'd have R/C's, gliders, sky divers, ag planes,
and the odd helicopter. Kept life interesting.


What would have been more interesting would be to have a friend at
their field with a transmitter while you fly patterns.

We have several pilots who are accomplished RC pilots as well. The
bring their models, some of which are big enough to require a trailer
and fly them at the field on occasion. Yes, they have several
helicopters as well. It's amazing to see a max effort take off with
one of those. Wind it right up to maximum then watch it climb
straight up several hundred feet so fast you can hardly follow it.

However the serious RCers have their own field about 5 miles from us
and there is almost always some one out there flying on a half way
decent day. Calm, warm, spring and summer days bring them out.

As to not being any threat, it all depends. Some of those models are
far faster than my Deb, or any of the other planes based at our field
and may weight several hundred pounds. OTOH I'd not want to be flying
very low over in that area anyway.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"bowman" wrote

I used to fly at an uncontrolled where people would fly R/C at the
airport.
Nice Sunday afternoon, you'd have R/C's, gliders, sky divers, ag planes,
and the odd helicopter. Kept life interesting.

It isn't that hard at a not-very-busy airport, to keep an eye out for "big
planes" entering the pattern, and landing, when they do. It is a worthwhile
trade-off for the RC'er, given the pavement and wide open spaces to enjoy!
--
Jim in NC