A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Need a 2nd nav with GNS 430?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 5th 05, 01:22 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have three 430/530 installations, two in the MU-2 and one in the Helio.
None of the Flight Manual Supplements require a current database for
approaches.

Mike
MU-2

"Peter R." wrote in message
oups.com...
Jose wrote:

3: if you can't update the database (such as you're in the middle of

a
trip during the window) you can't do IMC anymore. BTDT - at

Sun'n'Fun,
no less.


Is this a specific limitation spelled out in Garmin's POH supplement?
Not that I have done this due to burning my own cards and maintaining a
current subscription, but I was under the impression that one could
even fly an approach with an expired database, as long as a) the GPS
supplement doesn't restrict this and b) the pilot verifies the GPS
approach with a published approach plate.

If you burn your own database cards, you will note that the database
update for the Garmin GNS430/530 is normally released (at least here in
the US) ten days or so before becoming current. I suppose it is not
unrealistic to be away from home longer than ten days, but that does
provide some amount of time to plan for the expiration.

BTW, you raise some excellent points about the GPS being a single point
of failure. I also have also experienced three different GPS problems
during three different flights that rendered the unit inoperative for
five minutes or so per event. One was my fault, as I opened a bottle
of water at altitude that sprayed all over the GPS, thanks to the
pressure difference. The MSG button temporarily shorted out and I
could not see any page except the message page.

The other two problems were GPS software related. Of these two, the
notable one occurred when the database card I had in the unit became
*current* during my flight (at the crack of 00:00z of the new day - I
had placed the card in a day early for the flight). This was a
Bendix-King KLN-94 GPS and at the crack of 00z, a message appeared
stating that the unit needed to be rebooted due to the database
becoming current. Ridiculous of the unit to do this, but it caught me
with my pants down as the unit could not acquire satellites right away
upon rebooting. IMC at night and I did not have the VORs set as
backup. I scrambled to set up my VORs and only managed to drift off
course by a mile or two before getting back on course. That was a good
lesson.

--
Peter



  #22  
Old May 5th 05, 01:40 AM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 05 May 2005 00:22:53 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote:

I have three 430/530 installations, two in the MU-2 and one in the Helio.
None of the Flight Manual Supplements require a current database for
approaches.



Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

"The database confirmation page appears next and shows the current
database information on the NavData card (with the valid operating
dates, cycle number and database type included). The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?

  #23  
Old May 5th 05, 02:14 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, it is the flight manual supplement that is controlling. There may be
different supplements out there with different requirments too.

Mike
MU-2


"Peter Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 05 May 2005 00:22:53 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote:

I have three 430/530 installations, two in the MU-2 and one in the Helio.
None of the Flight Manual Supplements require a current database for
approaches.



Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

"The database confirmation page appears next and shows the current
database information on the NavData card (with the valid operating
dates, cycle number and database type included). The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?



  #24  
Old May 5th 05, 02:17 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

[...]The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?


No, it is the flight manual supplement that is controlling. There may be
different supplements out there with different requirments too.


You don't think "careless and reckless" would occur to the FAA should
such operations come to their attention?

Jose
(r.a.homebuilt retained, though I don't follow that group)
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #25  
Old May 5th 05, 04:15 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No. The only FAA approved document is the Flight Manual Supplement.

Mike
MU-2


"Jose" wrote in message
...
Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

[...]The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?


No, it is the flight manual supplement that is controlling. There may be
different supplements out there with different requirments too.


You don't think "careless and reckless" would occur to the FAA should such
operations come to their attention?

Jose
(r.a.homebuilt retained, though I don't follow that group)
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.



  #26  
Old May 5th 05, 01:19 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

3: if you can't update the database (such as you're in the middle of a
trip during the window) you can't do IMC anymore. BTDT - at Sun'n'Fun,
no less.


Chalk another one up for the 480...you can load two cycles up and it
auto switches.

4: you're in some bumpy clouds, reach over to switch off the strobes or
switch on the pitot heat or something, and a bump causes you to hit the
master. Oops - flip it back on. VORs come right back. NAV comes right
back. ADF comes right back. DME comes right back. GPS begins to
acquire satellites, do its self test, and waits for you to push the
lawyer button before continuing. Meanwhile, you're doing 150 knots in
the soup and just got an amended clearance. BTDT


Does not the 430 NAV section come up immeciately?


6: If you have an electrical failure in IMC, you may need to decide
what units to leave on the battery and what units to shut off. I don't
know the 430's current draw; you may be better off with just a single
VOR in some cases (though I wouldn't be surprised if the old VOR
receivers draw more than the new GPSs). BTDT, though without the 430.

Depends on what your other radio is. If it's comething modern like
an SL30, you're probably OK. But I was looking at the current draw
(again for the 480) and it doesn't draw much until you press the PTT
on the comm side.
  #27  
Old May 5th 05, 01:53 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does not the 430 NAV section come up immeciately?

Maybe the VOR part does, but the GPS doesn't. And if you've been
navigating by GPS, the VOR might not be set as a backup, but instead be
set for something else.

But it's a good point, and a good reason to have the 430 VOR set to back
up any navigation to/from VORs. Of course, navigating by GPS direct
this may not be that often.

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #28  
Old May 6th 05, 11:20 AM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't have one handy since I don't own one of these units, but don't
they have some language in the supplement that reads similar to "must
be operated in accordance with the pilots guide" or "see pilots guide
for further information"?

On Thu, 05 May 2005 03:15:34 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote:

No. The only FAA approved document is the Flight Manual Supplement.

Mike
MU-2


"Jose" wrote in message
m...
Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

[...]The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?

No, it is the flight manual supplement that is controlling. There may be
different supplements out there with different requirments too.


You don't think "careless and reckless" would occur to the FAA should such
operations come to their attention?

Jose
(r.a.homebuilt retained, though I don't follow that group)
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.



  #29  
Old May 6th 05, 02:12 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mine doesn't, others may vary.

Mike
MU-2


"Peter Clark" wrote in message
...
I don't have one handy since I don't own one of these units, but don't
they have some language in the supplement that reads similar to "must
be operated in accordance with the pilots guide" or "see pilots guide
for further information"?

On Thu, 05 May 2005 03:15:34 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote:

No. The only FAA approved document is the Flight Manual Supplement.

Mike
MU-2


"Jose" wrote in message
om...
Does the language in the GNS530 pilots guide, page 4:

[...]The database is
updated every 28 days and must be current for approved instrument
approach operations."

not create a requirement that the database be current to use the unit
for GPS or overlay approaches?

No, it is the flight manual supplement that is controlling. There may
be
different supplements out there with different requirments too.

You don't think "careless and reckless" would occur to the FAA should
such
operations come to their attention?

Jose
(r.a.homebuilt retained, though I don't follow that group)
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.





  #30  
Old May 7th 05, 03:55 AM
Paul Folbrecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A LORAN in an RV!! Oh, that is a hoot! I think that would be a first.

No offense.

Scott Moore wrote:

Michael wrote:

You can do everything you need to do with the 430, but there are
situations where havng only one is inconvenient. For about $250 you
can buy an M1 LORAN. Now you get a second set of nav signals



You can get one for less than $250. Just look in the garbage can
behind any avionics shop.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.