If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ Record results
"Al G" wrote in message ... "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message .. . The NAA has some aviation-related records that FAI doesn't keep track of. Guinness World Records has others as well. That's easy to verify. Ok, Juan, I did. James Campbell holds NO World records. He holds NO National Records. He is a confirmed Liar. Your opinion has been noted. shrug -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ Record results
"John Ousterhout" wrote in message news:WWGgh.271544$FQ1.18418@attbi_s71... Al G wrote: James Campbell holds NO World records. He holds NO National Records. He is a confirmed Liar. As a matter of fact Zoom was once determined to be a liar by an Administrative Law Judge. Well, sure, but that was just a judge, not a Flight Instructor! I sent a copy of the letter from NAA, to the Rocket Racing league. Al G |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ Record results
"Al G" wrote in message ... "John Ousterhout" wrote in message news:WWGgh.271544$FQ1.18418@attbi_s71... Al G wrote: James Campbell holds NO World records. He holds NO National Records. He is a confirmed Liar. As a matter of fact Zoom was once determined to be a liar by an Administrative Law Judge. Well, sure, but that was just a judge, not a Flight Instructor! I sent a copy of the letter from NAA, to the Rocket Racing league. If you want to join RRL, have you considered just sending an application. I find it intensely amusing how many of you schmucks run around trying to make trouble for Campbell, and wind up bouncing off the wall, over and over again. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt? If so, who was this disinterested party and what organization, if any, does he represent? Notary public? OK, what is his seal number and state? My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It's just that simple. You claim to have been a Marine, what would have happened to you if you wore an unauthorized award, decoration or other distinctive insignia on your uniform? It's all about integrity. I have seen documentation of cambell's impersonation of a doctor, parachute instructor etc. That is sufficient for me to doubt his claiming this record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by anyone. Then it's not a record. Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. I don't think he can at this point. One of the advantages of an FAI certified record is it's rather hard to disprove it. I don't know about you, but if I had set a record and wanted to announce it I'd have all the verification I could get and get it recognized by FAI. Then again, if I had done what he said just for the fun of it I would never claim the record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt? Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All bark, no bite. My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand. I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your chance. Juan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by anyone. Then it's not a record. Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. Sorry, but no. Wrong answer. Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer. The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such a conclusion. No one here does. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "DABEAR" wrote in message oups.com... snipped FWIW, I don't recall Zoom claiming his 'record' was recognized by anyone. Then it's not a record. Sorry, but that's wrong too. A record is a record if you document it to a sufficient level that it can be verified. Whether or not the person chooses to submit it to the FAI does not change that. An "FAI Record" is only such if it is recognized by the FAI. Two different statements. The problem is cambell provides no disinterested documentation. Sorry, but no. Wrong answer. Have you asked him? Never mind, I already know the answer. The simple, incontrovertible fact is that you have no evidence to reach such a conclusion. No one here does. He hasn't yet provided proof in any publication. If you have such proof provide it. As for asking him, why should I? It's up to him to provide proof especially since he's on record about lying about other accomplishments. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
FYI Bio zoom ZZZZZZZZ
Juan Jimenez wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... Juan Jimenez wrote: http://www.aero-news.net/news/featur...B643&Dynamic=1 Gee, he lost his chase plane according to your cite. No witnesses no record. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired Still trying to prove intelligence? Notice the word "barograph" in the article? chuckle Get over it. Yawn, is there an unbiased party who who verified calibration of said barograph, sealed said barograph, placed said barograph in the aircraft and verified that said barograph remained sealed with its original seal and verified the maximum altitude upon completion of the attempt? Go ask Jim. That is, assuming you can muster the cojones to do so, given no one else around seems to have any when it comes to going to the source. All bark, no bite. My point is he made a claim and has yet to prove it. If he wants to be taken seriously on this point he should have submitted it to a controlling authority. It really isn't that difficult to understand. I don't think he really gives a damn what anyone else here thinks of what he did or didn't do, Dan. If you haven't figured that out yet, here's your chance. Juan As a publisher he should care what people think of him. I used to read ANN, but don't anymore. He's a proven liar which makes me suspect everything he says. On the other hand you criticize people who question his claims without providing any proof of your own. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Zoom | Cy Galley | Home Built | 213 | May 17th 05 01:19 AM |
Zoom sues...again | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 9 | April 28th 05 01:11 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 49 | July 22nd 04 06:06 PM |
ANN is biased ZZZJJJ | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 30 | January 4th 04 01:58 PM |