A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fly tight for tight bomb patterns on the ground.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 23rd 04, 08:08 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fly tight for tight bomb patterns on the ground.


The tighter the formation you fly the tighter the bomb pattern on the ground
and the more damage you do to the enemy.


http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer/stripes.htm





Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #2  
Old August 23rd 04, 10:57 PM
Dave Eadsforth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , ArtKramr
writes

The tighter the formation you fly the tighter the bomb pattern on the ground
and the more damage you do to the enemy.


http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer/stripes.htm





Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer



For a single pass at the target, that sounds okay - as long as the
formation as a whole is mastered accurately. However, how did the
formation attack compare with say a long string of B17s in trail, each
aiming individually? The formation attack must be all or nothing,
whereas the trail attack must result in a number of well-aimed drops
amongst the average ones.

Cheers,

Dave

--
Dave Eadsforth
  #3  
Old August 24th 04, 12:13 AM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Eadsforth wrote:

However, how did the
formation attack compare with say a long string of B17s in trail, each
aiming individually?


In 1937, with career Army Air Corps crews, over Arizona with little wind it
worked great! In 1943 with crews that had been in service 18 months, over
Germany with flak and fighters...not so well.

The formation attack must be all or nothing,
whereas the trail attack must result in a number of well-aimed drops
amongst the average ones.


Except a two mile long train of B-17s looks like donuts rolling off the
production line to an Me-109 pilot.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #9  
Old August 24th 04, 05:18 AM
BUFDRVR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ArtKramr wrote:

In 1937, with career Army Air Corps crews, over Arizona with little wind it
worked great! In 1943 with crews that had been in service 18 months, over
Germany with flak and fighters...not so well.


How the hell would you know?


Books, ever heard of them? Oh, I'm sorry that's right, you don't read books
about WW II because you subscribe to the "if you weren't there, you don't know
****" theory. The problem with your theory is that nearly all of the books I've
read have been written from first hand accounts of people who were there.

Except a two mile long train of B-17s looks like donuts rolling off the
production line to an Me-109 pilot.


We never flew in "long trains".


I never said you did you ignorant old goof!

What rinky dink air force were you in?


The one from the United States. The one that has come to dominate enemies like
the Air Force of your generation could only dream of.

Too bad you never fought in a real war.


Well, I'm in good company. Kramer's "real wars" exclude everyone outside of the
World War II ETO from 1943-45. North Africa? Not real. Med? Not real. Pacific?
Please...not real. Korea? Not real. Vietnam? Not real. Desert Storm and all the
conflicts since then? Not real. In fact, I'm willing to bet the proud group of
"Kramer's not real warriors" will never stop growing.

I guess once you hit 80+ years of age its too hard to be self retrospective? If
I said half the things Kramer has I wouldn't be able to look at myself in the
mirror to shave.


BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"
  #10  
Old August 24th 04, 05:29 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I said half the things Kramer has I wouldn't be able to look at myself in the
mirror to shave.



You still can't


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A BOMB PATTER IS LIKE A FOOTBALL ArtKramr Military Aviation 17 March 3rd 04 01:54 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AIRCRAFT MUNITIONS - THE COBALT BOMB Garrison Hilliard Military Aviation 1 August 29th 03 09:22 AM
Aircraft bomb frag patterns Mike D Military Aviation 6 August 24th 03 05:16 AM
FORMATIONS, BOMB RUNS AND RADIUS OF ACTION ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 August 10th 03 02:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.