If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Older Bo's
All,
I was recently perusing through some of the newer Trade-A-Plane listings, and I saw tons of old Bonanzas. Within the last 3 days of listings, there were probably 10 or more. From previous threads in this newsgroup, I have read that the older Bo's are expensive to maintain, typically due to the high cost on parts. So, I was wondering why the parts are so expensive and/or hard to come by if there are so many planes out there? Does someone have an older Bonanza who could comment on this? Adam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Depends on what you consider "old". Parts for some of the older E225
engines are getting scarce, but airframe parts are pretty much available. They're really not much more expensive than Piper or Cessna, and probably last longer with proper maintenance. The real question you should be asking is how well maintained are the aircraft you're looking at. I've seen 1960 models go from $40K to $110K. Yes, those were selling prices, On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:46:04 -0700, "The Weiss Family" wrote: All, I was recently perusing through some of the newer Trade-A-Plane listings, and I saw tons of old Bonanzas. Within the last 3 days of listings, there were probably 10 or more. From previous threads in this newsgroup, I have read that the older Bo's are expensive to maintain, typically due to the high cost on parts. So, I was wondering why the parts are so expensive and/or hard to come by if there are so many planes out there? Does someone have an older Bonanza who could comment on this? Adam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stu Gotts wrote
airframe parts are pretty much available. They're really not much more expensive than Piper or Cessna Not my experience. A friend of mine just bought an older Baron. Elevator trim tab is a bit loose, needs a new Clevis fork. On a Cessna or Piper, that would be a standard AN part, maybe $10-$20. On the Baron, it's a Beech-specific part. Sure, it's available. $156. Beech-specific parts ARE more expensive, often by an order of magnitude. Whether they last longer or not is debatable. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Michael wrote:
Stu Gotts wrote airframe parts are pretty much available. They're really not much more expensive than Piper or Cessna [snip] Beech-specific parts ARE more expensive, often by an order of magnitude. Whether they last longer or not is debatable. I concur with Michael. I'm not a master of what Piper prices are, but my wallet has felt the hit of Raytheon (Beech) prices are. I personally have shelled out $400 for a cabin door hinge, $120 for a single landing gear bushing. And those are just my personal experiances. I think the worst I've heard about is ~$4,000 for the sheet metal baffleing on an E-powered plane. The real insult on that bit of slightly stamped sheet metal was that the owner had to wait 6 months for it. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" (A '49 A35) Hood River, OR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"The Weiss Family" wrote in message ... All, I was recently perusing through some of the newer Trade-A-Plane listings, and I saw tons of old Bonanzas. Within the last 3 days of listings, there were probably 10 or more. From previous threads in this newsgroup, I have read that the older Bo's are expensive to maintain, typically due to the high cost on parts. So, I was wondering why the parts are so expensive and/or hard to come by if there are so many planes out there? Does someone have an older Bonanza who could comment on this? Adam As mentioned in another post, supplies of engine components for some models are becoming problematic. An additional problem is the magnesium control surfaces on the older aircraft, which sometimes (often?) corrode to the point where they are paper thin. Unscrupulous people will fill and paint these surfaces, even when they should be replaced, and replacements *ain't* cheap. Another problem is that the very early Bonanzas have never had a major AD on the empennage, which means that the fittings back there have never been given a good inspection. A final problem is that older wiring harnesses can crumble into dust when you even look at 'em funny. I saw all these problems and more when an acquaintance bought a '47 Bonanza. My guess is that the oldest Bonanzas became ramp queens after 20-30 years, because newer, better equipped, more capable aircraft were plentiful on the used market, so why spend the bucks to keep up a more or less obsolete aircraft. Instead, sell the old bird to someone else and upgrade to a 15 year newer version... After about two annuals, the new owner can't afford annual #3 on the old Bo, and tries to sell the airplane. Unfortunately, he can't get his money out of it, so it sits for 1/2 a decade until someone buys it, restores it to sellable condition, and advertises it in trade a plane. Not that this is the tale of *all* old Bonanzas, but I'd be very wary of an old, cheap Bonanza. KB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:09:16 -0400, "Kyle Boatright"
wrote: "The Weiss Family" wrote in message ... All, I was recently perusing through some of the newer Trade-A-Plane listings, and I saw tons of old Bonanzas. Within the last 3 days of listings, there were probably 10 or more. From previous threads in this newsgroup, I have read that the older Bo's are expensive to maintain, typically due to the high cost on parts. So, I was wondering why the parts are so expensive and/or hard to come by if there are so many planes out there? Does someone have an older Bonanza who could comment on this? Adam As mentioned in another post, supplies of engine components for some models are becoming problematic. An additional problem is the magnesium control surfaces on the older aircraft, which sometimes (often?) corrode to the point where they are paper thin. Unscrupulous people will fill and paint these surfaces, even when they should be replaced, and replacements *ain't* cheap. Another problem is that the very early Bonanzas have never had a major AD on the empennage, which means that the fittings back there have never been given a good inspection. A final problem is that older wiring On ,mine the tail cone is taken off for every annual. Everything back there gets a good look. harnesses can crumble into dust when you even look at 'em funny. I saw all these problems and more when an acquaintance bought a '47 Bonanza. That is one of the biggest problems with any old airplane. The old rubber covering on things like the throttle, mixture and prop controls gets hard and brittle. I finally had to replace the throttle cable on mine. My guess is that the oldest Bonanzas became ramp queens after 20-30 years, Nope, some of the originals are still flying. Olive Beech's personal plane is still flying and that is an *old* V-tail. Do a search on the FAA database and you should find lots of them. I'm flying the first straight tail off the line. because newer, better equipped, more capable aircraft were plentiful on the used market, so why spend the bucks to keep up a more or less obsolete aircraft. Instead, sell the old bird to someone else and upgrade to a 15 year newer version... After about two annuals, the new owner can't afford annual #3 on the old Bo, and tries to sell the airplane. Unfortunately, he My annuals on average are a bit less than a thousand. Some times more and some times less. Course the whole airframe which was built in 59 still has less than 4000 hours on it. It is getting time to have the paint redone though even if it does look pretty good. can't get his money out of it, so it sits for 1/2 a decade until someone buys it, restores it to sellable condition, and advertises it in trade a plane. Not that this is the tale of *all* old Bonanzas, but I'd be very wary of an old, cheap Bonanza. I'd be wary of any old, cheap airplane. :-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com KB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
{sorry I've lost track of the attributions}
cheap. Another problem is that the very early Bonanzas have never had a major AD on the empennage, which means that the fittings back there have never been given a good inspection. A final problem is that older wiring Dunno what you mean by no major AD on the empennage. There is the AD for inspecting ruddervator push rods. There is the the "speed restriction" AD that calls for skin thickness testing and ruddervator rebalance. Are these major? Depends upon your definition, I suppose. On ,mine the tail cone is taken off for every annual. Everything back there gets a good look. [ I think this is Rich Hare talking about his Debonair ] The tail cone should always be removed for annual. However, the fittings back there are significantly different between the bonanza and the Debonair. Nope, some of the originals are still flying. Olive Beech's personal plane is still flying and that is an *old* V-tail. Yup, saw serial number 12 last summer in Seattle. Looked pretty good. There are still older ones still flying. I had a belly laugh a few years ago when I saw that A35 hanging in the Spruce Goose Museum in McMinville Or had a later serial number than mine. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" ('49 A35, serial number D-1514) Hood River, OR |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hey! Hey! Hey!
Don't nobody go around saying that _I_ fly a Debonair! I fly a gen you wine "V" tail! (My third one!) Bonanza parts _are_ expensive... but sturdier than most other brand "P" and "C" parts. Therein lies the Bonanza curse. Things last so long that people successfully forego maintenance for a long while because "it's still working pretty good"... and then it finally goes out of serviceable tolerance and you have to buy the $109 bushing (or eight of them in the main landing gear scissors) that you wouldn't pay 69 cents for at Ace Hardware. Lots of older used Bonanzas are at that point in their service life. Rich Frank Stutzman wrote: {sorry I've lost track of the attributions} [ I think this is Rich Hare talking about his Debonair ] The tail cone should always be removed for annual. However, the fittings back there are significantly different between the bonanza and the Debonair. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:59:19 -0400, Rich wrote:
Hey! Hey! Hey! Don't nobody go around saying that _I_ fly a Debonair! No, Now... Let's not confuse such a modern design as the Deb with an antique! :-)) I mean, you're compairing a 1947 design to a 1959 design, even if it is the same airplane with a different empenage. They even call mine a 35-33 OTOH Frank's 49 makes my 59 look positively modern. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com I fly a gen you wine "V" tail! (My third one!) Bonanza parts _are_ expensive... but sturdier than most other brand "P" and "C" parts. Therein lies the Bonanza curse. Things last so long that people successfully forego maintenance for a long while because "it's still working pretty good"... and then it finally goes out of serviceable tolerance and you have to buy the $109 bushing (or eight of them in the main landing gear scissors) that you wouldn't pay 69 cents for at Ace Hardware. Lots of older used Bonanzas are at that point in their service life. Rich Frank Stutzman wrote: {sorry I've lost track of the attributions} [ I think this is Rich Hare talking about his Debonair ] The tail cone should always be removed for annual. However, the fittings back there are significantly different between the bonanza and the Debonair. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rich wrote:
Hey! Hey! Hey! Don't nobody go around saying that _I_ fly a Debonair! I fly a gen you wine "V" tail! (My third one!) Sorry, I stand corrected. Rich Hare/Roger Halstead. At least I got the initials correct. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" Hood River, OR |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: copy of Flying Buyers' Guide 1983 or older | Ren? | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 14th 05 06:06 AM |
Glass Cockpit in Older Planes | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 2 | May 20th 04 01:20 AM |
New law for older airplanes? | Jim B | Owning | 25 | May 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Buying an older airplane | Kai Glaesner | Owning | 39 | April 5th 04 06:54 PM |
Contact cleaning on older Nav radio | Mike Noel | Owning | 4 | September 15th 03 02:28 PM |