A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

why is Vne a TAS?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 11th 05, 05:46 AM
private
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default why is Vne a TAS?

Hello Todd,

In a recent thread on R.A..S.(interesting question about stall and airspeed)
that morphed into a discussion about coffin corner, Todd explained,

"Flutter limits high true airspeed operations, and it is possible to get to
the coffin corner where stall speed and Vne approach each other."

and Jim suggested we "consider Vne as a TAS".

Can I have the groups wisdom and further explanation of the reasons for this
and of how Vne changes with altitude.

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at 15-18,000
ft?

Thanks in advance


  #2  
Old September 11th 05, 04:02 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

VNE can be set for a variety of reasons.

Structural strength. This one is probably limited by IAS/CAS

Flutter or other dynamics problems. This is releated to the dynamic
behavior of the airflow and is most likely a TAS limit.

So to really answer the question you need to know what the limiting
VNE factor was for your aircraft.




..




On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:46:58 GMT, "private"
wrote:

Hello Todd,

In a recent thread on R.A..S.(interesting question about stall and airspeed)
that morphed into a discussion about coffin corner, Todd explained,

"Flutter limits high true airspeed operations, and it is possible to get to
the coffin corner where stall speed and Vne approach each other."

and Jim suggested we "consider Vne as a TAS".

Can I have the groups wisdom and further explanation of the reasons for this
and of how Vne changes with altitude.

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at 15-18,000
ft?

Thanks in advance


  #3  
Old September 11th 05, 04:41 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

private wrote:

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at 15-18,000
ft?


Certainly. You'll find the numbers in the POH. (In real life, 9000 ft is
no issue. Soaring in wave up to 30'000 ft is.)

Stefan
  #4  
Old September 11th 05, 07:35 PM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at
15-18,000
ft?


Many gliders capable of Vne around 146 kias below 10,000 MSL actually have
lower IAS Vne charted for altitudes above 10,000ft MSL and in 3000ft blocks.
The DG1000 has the following limits.
Vne at 10,000ft is 146KIAS, 13,000ft is 138KIAS, 16,000ft is 131KIAS,
20,000ft is 114KIAS, 23,000ft is 117KIAS and 26,000ft is 111KIAS

Vne is based on IAS, TAS for the same IAS is higher at higher altitudes. But
remember, it's not just airspeed, or airspeed indicator errors associated
with altitude changes, but also other dynamic "q" factors on the airframe at
higher "effective" airspeeds.

Many jets have a Maximum operating Mach limit. Vmo would not change with
altitude, but the IAS limit associated with that Mach limit will continually
decrease as altitude increases. Eventually that Vmo (IAS) gets down to
Vstall, and that is the "coffin corner" in a previous post.

BT


  #6  
Old September 12th 05, 02:59 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I remember the thread, and I have yet to have the notion that VNE should
be TAS explained satisfactorily.

Dave

private wrote:

Hello Todd,

In a recent thread on R.A..S.(interesting question about stall and airspeed)
that morphed into a discussion about coffin corner, Todd explained,

"Flutter limits high true airspeed operations, and it is possible to get to
the coffin corner where stall speed and Vne approach each other."

and Jim suggested we "consider Vne as a TAS".

Can I have the groups wisdom and further explanation of the reasons for this
and of how Vne changes with altitude.

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at 15-18,000
ft?

Thanks in advance



  #7  
Old September 12th 05, 03:38 AM
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"private" wrote
"Flutter limits high true airspeed operations, and it is possible to
get to the coffin corner where stall speed and Vne approach each
other."
Can I have the groups wisdom and further explanation of the reasons
for this and of how Vne changes with altitude.



It is probably not "flutter" that sets the high speed limit, but
rather "critical Mach bufett". Yes, even a glider has a Mmo but
no mach meter to indicate it, so an equivalent TAS becomes the limit.

Copied from a web site:

"The critical Mach number is the free stream Mach number at which sonic
flow first appears on the airfoil/wing.

Buffeting is the structural response to excitation produced by the shock-
induced flow separation, and is ultimtely related to the vortex formation
and breakdown. Buffeting may affect different parts of the airframe, but
the buffeting on the wing is the most important.

As the speed increases the wing is affected by shock stall, whose
appearance sets an upper limit to the speed. This limit is a function of
the flight altitude. Its envelope is called buffeting boundary."

Bob Moore

  #8  
Old September 12th 05, 03:48 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

poor choice of wording on "Vne is based on TAS" ....
Vne is actually based on other structral limits, flutter, drag buffets,
control etc.. and is equated to a value in speed. Not all GA aircraft have
Mach Meters or "barber pole" indications, most only have IAS so that is what
is used. One can watch the barber pole move with control changes, altitude
changes or changes in wing sweep position.

BT

"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:yN_Ue.14282$ct5.10523@fed1read04...
Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at
15-18,000
ft?


Many gliders capable of Vne around 146 kias below 10,000 MSL actually have
lower IAS Vne charted for altitudes above 10,000ft MSL and in 3000ft
blocks. The DG1000 has the following limits.
Vne at 10,000ft is 146KIAS, 13,000ft is 138KIAS, 16,000ft is 131KIAS,
20,000ft is 114KIAS, 23,000ft is 117KIAS and 26,000ft is 111KIAS

Vne is based on IAS, TAS for the same IAS is higher at higher altitudes.
But remember, it's not just airspeed, or airspeed indicator errors
associated with altitude changes, but also other dynamic "q" factors on
the airframe at higher "effective" airspeeds.

Many jets have a Maximum operating Mach limit. Vmo would not change with
altitude, but the IAS limit associated with that Mach limit will
continually decrease as altitude increases. Eventually that Vmo (IAS) gets
down to Vstall, and that is the "coffin corner" in a previous post.

BT



  #9  
Old September 12th 05, 08:03 AM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Moore wrote:

It is probably not "flutter" that sets the high speed limit, but
rather "critical Mach bufett". Yes, even a glider has a Mmo but
no mach meter to indicate it, so an equivalent TAS becomes the limit.


The typical Vne for gliders is around 150 knots. Pretty low for mach
buffets.

If you want to see what flutter is, look he
http://www.dg-download.de/Videos/dg-...terversuch.mpg

Stefan
  #10  
Old September 12th 05, 05:54 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The limiting airspeed, Vne is the speed where the airplane structure still
meets the certification requirements. For light aircraft it is normally set
at 90% of Vd (demonstrated dive speed) The limit could be where the
maximium design gust equals the structural limit of the airplane or it could
be the highest speed where a reasonable flutter margin is present. As
others have said, it could be related to critical Mach number although this
is unlikely to be the limiting factor for slow, light airplanes. If the
limit is for gust loading, then it is based on CAS. If it is based on
flutter or Mach limit, it is based on TAS. Even if it is based on TAS, it
is given in IAS in airplanes without a Mach meter. or barber pole. The IAS
limit is based on the ceiling of the aircraft.. The same thing can be
accomplished by placards (reduce Vmo (or Vne) by x knots for every thousand
feet above xx,xxx' altitude.

The "coffin corner" is where stall and Mmo (not Vne) come together. I don't
think that there is an aiplane that can reach the coffin corner that even
has a Vne.

There is some discussion of this topic in one of Barry Schiff's books.

Mike

"private" wrote in message
news:6FOUe.465897$s54.126911@pd7tw2no...
Hello Todd,

In a recent thread on R.A..S.(interesting question about stall and
airspeed)
that morphed into a discussion about coffin corner, Todd explained,

"Flutter limits high true airspeed operations, and it is possible to get
to
the coffin corner where stall speed and Vne approach each other."

and Jim suggested we "consider Vne as a TAS".

Can I have the groups wisdom and further explanation of the reasons for
this
and of how Vne changes with altitude.

Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when
planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at
15-18,000
ft?

Thanks in advance




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.