A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pentagon planning Navy buildup as 'warning to Iran'



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 24th 06, 03:53 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default .

wrote in message
oups.com...
[Rense_December 20, 2006]

"Ahmadinejad Is Right"

By Karin Friedemann

Ahmadinejad is doing the right thing to point out the Jewish issues.


Uh, last time I checked Syria has occupied Lebanon, not Israel.
And Iran is in Syria and Lebanon as well....

The Jews want to bomb Iran.


Cite? Just one Jewish statement of them wanting to "wipe Iran from the map".

Threatened with an Iraq-style war by the U.S. Jews, Ahmadinejad has
nothing to lose.


I doubt a conflict with the US and Iran would look anything like Iraq.

He saw from Saddam's example that if you comply with
weapons inspectors and act submissive and politically correct, your
country will be irradiated.


LMAO!, Saddam did not comply with the UN.

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Ads
  #12  
Old January 1st 07, 04:10 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Ski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default Pentagon planning Navy buildup as 'warning to Iran'

were we not talking about battleships a few months back
like pulling out the Wisconsin again and home porting it in the Gulf with a
local crew
funded by locals - hummm - why would any carriers in the Gulf be needed
and of course there is the point about throwing grenades without their pins
pulled
but the BB's just sit there and look at you and look at you and look at you
and look at you ....



"eatfastnoodle" wrote in message
ups.com...
Warning is not a Warning when nobody believes that you will indeed
carry out the threat, there have been so many "warnings" (don't do
this, don't do that, otherwise there will be consequences, don't test
the bomb/US will never tolerate a nuclear NK/Iran) sent to Iran and
North Korea so far that US credibility has become a joke, because they
did exactly what the US warned them not to do, and what they got?
ANOTHER WARNING. When you don't have the military resources, diplomatic
support and political capital to back it up, warning is just an
invitation for the world to see how powerless and stupid you are,
better to admit your weakness and try other routes.



  #13  
Old January 1st 07, 05:35 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Arash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default ,

Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.

  #14  
Old January 4th 07, 04:10 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Ski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default ,

hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.



  #15  
Old January 4th 07, 04:19 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,soc.culture.turkish
A dirty muzzie pig's worst nightmare!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Pentagon planning Navy buildup as 'warning to Iran'

Tankfixer wrote:
In article . net,
mumbled
"AirRaid" wrote in message
ups.com...
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N18217613.htm


US to warn Iran with naval buildup in Gulf- CBS
19 Dec 2006 03:28:31 GMT
Source: Reuters


WASHINGTON, Dec 18 (Reuters) - The Pentagon is planning a major buildup
of U.S. naval forces in and around the Gulf as a warning to Iran, CBS
News reported on Monday. [snip]


Naval buildup, hell. ONE Trident submarine can turn all of Iran into the
world's largest ashtray ---


Iran IS the worlds largest asstray


lol!!! If that doesn't say it all, nothing does!

Gary the mighty Yaako warrior.

  #16  
Old January 4th 07, 04:42 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Vince
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default ,

Ski wrote:
hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.





you mean it would be sunk?

Vince
  #17  
Old January 4th 07, 05:00 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Ski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default ,

sink them in shallow water and still use the guns and superstructure
think of it this way - we would want the Iranians to shoot at the battle ship and possibly sink it for a proper start of a war
we would not like to loose a carrier group for the same start pass - think strategic man
besides the battle ship would be paid for by the locals and could benefit them with the joint command center they do not have


"Vince" wrote in message . ..
Ski wrote:
hat is why we need to take out the carrier battle groups and bring back a
battle ship that would be left there forever





"Arash" wrote in message
oups.com...
Slow and huge U.S. warships are very vulnerable in a tiny operating
area like the Persian Gulf.





you mean it would be sunk?

Vince

  #18  
Old January 4th 07, 07:08 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,alt.religion.islam,soc.culture.iranian,sci.military.naval
Vince
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default ,

Ski wrote:
sink them in shallow water and still use the guns and superstructure


this is just silly

If that is your point, no problem

Vince
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IRAQ DISASTER WARNING - An Attack on Iran by Christmas? [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 November 12th 06 06:24 AM
Bush Orders Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Eisenhower and Additional Navy Ships To Iran's Western Coast [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 October 15th 06 06:39 AM
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 Mike Naval Aviation 0 May 6th 06 11:13 PM
Bush administration finalizes military attack on Iran [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 January 5th 06 10:38 AM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.