On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 23:09:03 +0200, "Emmanuel Gustin"
wrote:

"BUFDRVR" wrote in message
...

Your opinion is formed on little or no education about the current
government
otherwise you wouldn't call them "Neo-Con".

The term "neo-con" has the advantage that it is close, if
not in etymology then at least in sound and appearance,
to "con-men".

This IMHO contributes greatly to its appropriateness.

That may be the most foolish thing I've heard today, if not for the
entire week. A bit of research would educate you that the "neo-con"
movement greatly predates the Bush administration and relates mostly
to US/Israel relations.

But, then using your rationale of "sound and appearance" you won't
mind if I refer to as Belch-eek. Or, maybe Bulgian. Or, pseudo-French.

My heartfelt and respectfully submitted suggestion is that you simply
let us conduct our politics and refrain from embarrassing yourself.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
"Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights"
Both from Smithsonian Books
***www.thunderchief.org